Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 6, 2020 10:00:03 GMT
p1. Suppose (to cut some details down) a person who can use (psychic) reflection is a consciousness one.
p2. Before performing any dangerous, risky, or unusual actions the person is worrying, or, in other words, he experience the possible experience of next actions.
p3. (If animals were predecessors of humans, and the animals used similar experience each time they had encountered some risky, and dangerous action, then they had experienced the possible experience of next actions.)
p4. As choices the necessary component of experience the experience of the possible next actions logically we can begin with analyzing choices.
p5. All the choices can be represented as dilemmas:
Plain symbolization of dilemma: a|b, where a is one possible choice, where b is the second one. "|" is called Sheffer's stroke, and it has the next truth tables for a and b, and a with a:
a b a|b a a|a a b a|a|b 1 of (a|a) = I of (a|b)
I. T T F 1. T F 3. T T T 2 of (a|a) = IV of (a|b)
II. T F T 2. F T 4. T F F 3 of (a|a|b) = 1 of (a|a) & I of (a|b)
III.F T T 5. F T T 4 of (a|a|b) = 1 of (a|a) & II of (a|b)
IV. F F T 6. F F T 5 and 6 of (a|a|b) similar.
Considering the theorem of completeness that "~" and "→" are enough to get all the formulas of PL, and a|b has all those properties.
If through a|b can be uttered any proposition, through dilemmas can be uttered any proposition.
p6. There's no way to escape thinking each time when a mind has encountered a dilemma: it must to overcome it somehow, or to skip. Overcoming - is a type of solution or decision; skipping must be done only being in consciousness. Therefore, if there's dilemma, there's consciousness.
p7. All the choices are being created either by mind, or not. Being created my mind means - to have previous dilemmas, because we must to choose which one (part) to pick as a possible choose; not being created means - our mind had gotten it previously (somehow). If the latter one, then there are a priori knowledge. And I insist that a priori knowledge is a kind of experience. Hence, either choices have experience foundations, or they've been created previously using mind (but that's not our case, so we can not take this case as an example).
p8. If the experience precedes thinking, then choices are what appears in experience being formed like choices. But, if p2 is true, then evaluation of danger or risk has come firstly. So, we should have some values of what this think is and those things are to have an ability to choose. If so, then values had come much previously then thinking, if the last one is supposed to be based on dilemmas.
An important question - are dilemma representation is similar to the representation of human being? Is it the same?
p2. Before performing any dangerous, risky, or unusual actions the person is worrying, or, in other words, he experience the possible experience of next actions.
p3. (If animals were predecessors of humans, and the animals used similar experience each time they had encountered some risky, and dangerous action, then they had experienced the possible experience of next actions.)
p4. As choices the necessary component of experience the experience of the possible next actions logically we can begin with analyzing choices.
p5. All the choices can be represented as dilemmas:
Plain symbolization of dilemma: a|b, where a is one possible choice, where b is the second one. "|" is called Sheffer's stroke, and it has the next truth tables for a and b, and a with a:
a b a|b a a|a a b a|a|b 1 of (a|a) = I of (a|b)
I. T T F 1. T F 3. T T T 2 of (a|a) = IV of (a|b)
II. T F T 2. F T 4. T F F 3 of (a|a|b) = 1 of (a|a) & I of (a|b)
III.F T T 5. F T T 4 of (a|a|b) = 1 of (a|a) & II of (a|b)
IV. F F T 6. F F T 5 and 6 of (a|a|b) similar.
Considering the theorem of completeness that "~" and "→" are enough to get all the formulas of PL, and a|b has all those properties.
If through a|b can be uttered any proposition, through dilemmas can be uttered any proposition.
p6. There's no way to escape thinking each time when a mind has encountered a dilemma: it must to overcome it somehow, or to skip. Overcoming - is a type of solution or decision; skipping must be done only being in consciousness. Therefore, if there's dilemma, there's consciousness.
p7. All the choices are being created either by mind, or not. Being created my mind means - to have previous dilemmas, because we must to choose which one (part) to pick as a possible choose; not being created means - our mind had gotten it previously (somehow). If the latter one, then there are a priori knowledge. And I insist that a priori knowledge is a kind of experience. Hence, either choices have experience foundations, or they've been created previously using mind (but that's not our case, so we can not take this case as an example).
p8. If the experience precedes thinking, then choices are what appears in experience being formed like choices. But, if p2 is true, then evaluation of danger or risk has come firstly. So, we should have some values of what this think is and those things are to have an ability to choose. If so, then values had come much previously then thinking, if the last one is supposed to be based on dilemmas.
An important question - are dilemma representation is similar to the representation of human being? Is it the same?