Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 2, 2020 22:09:01 GMT
1. The bigger amount of particles by which we attack a wall in some physical experiments, the more reasonable to claim that their traces will repeat holes or will have a predictable interference image (because of some statistics law behind it).
2. The bigger amount of particles of one type/kind of nature we have, the more reasonable to think that they have a limited amount of relations. (So, the question, will the limit of relations be increased or decreased, if a number of similar elements gets higher?)
3. The more various particles we have, the more untypical relations we will have. (Intuitively we might think about this such or resolution, so what's your thoughts?)
What type of correlation a number of relations and a kind of particles have between each other? Should we follow The Set Theory here, taking into account plain math type of relation, or we have to deep it, or build more complex pictures here? What's ya think 'bout it?
2. The bigger amount of particles of one type/kind of nature we have, the more reasonable to think that they have a limited amount of relations. (So, the question, will the limit of relations be increased or decreased, if a number of similar elements gets higher?)
3. The more various particles we have, the more untypical relations we will have. (Intuitively we might think about this such or resolution, so what's your thoughts?)
What type of correlation a number of relations and a kind of particles have between each other? Should we follow The Set Theory here, taking into account plain math type of relation, or we have to deep it, or build more complex pictures here? What's ya think 'bout it?