|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 2, 2020 10:34:41 GMT
1. Materialism claims that there's no anything, but matter. 2. Matter is stuff that can be perceieved or could be perceived. 3. If it's not able to be percepted, then it must left some traces which have to be perceived. 4. The traces must have appeared each time when some causes occur, or everything that can be directly perceived has deterministic nature. 5. No other views describe the reality.
All these points doesn seem to be false. Could these views be maintaned as contemporary materialism?
|
|
|
Post by singerofsongs on Nov 7, 2020 6:46:49 GMT
confused... how does this relate to the laws of physics? surely newton still applies, therefore force and acceleration still generate energy?
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 7, 2020 21:17:21 GMT
confused... how does this relate to the laws of physics? surely newton still applies, therefore force and acceleration still generate energy? Honestly, I don't get along with physics. If there's a curving of the space (or the space-time), it probably occurs because of gravitons. Aren't gravitons the matter, or kind of it?
|
|