|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 28, 2020 17:29:21 GMT
Actually I guess I am a person who's so coward to acknowledge that I'm not pursuing the truth, nor searching for anything wise.
Even not being satisfied completely because of having none of this, having none of that – the market is producing and trying to sell me as much as possible different necessary and plenty unnecessary things – I still want to buy another thing... Crap!..
Plus I can't even read those books I've been buying. My bookshelf is teeming with worth-2-read books, while I am about to watch another y-Tube video or kinda...
Therefore, I presume that a wise person must be the real inversion or opposition of/to "Eugene 2.0".
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 28, 2020 18:56:22 GMT
Actually I guess I am a person who's so coward to acknowledge that I'm not pursuing the truth, nor searching for anything wise. Even not being satisfied completely because of having none of this, having none of that – the market is producing and trying to sell me as much as possible different necessary and plenty unnecessary things – I still want to buy another thing... Crap!.. Plus I can't even read those books I've been buying. My bookshelf is teeming with worth-2-read books, while I am about to watch another y-Tube video or kinda... Therefore, I presume that a wise person must be the real inversion or opposition of/to "Eugene 2.0". I really understand. The wise is wise because of his wisdom. Because of what he choices for himself. I am no wise. But I am really trying to achieve, if not wisdom, a practical knowledge based in a profound, if not moral, ethical sense. Moral is a thing problematic for me, because I am fundamentaly skeptic of moral questions. I really don't think that all can be solved in moral grounds. But I really understand that people jugde morally, but I have a strong dificulty in judging morally certain behaviors and questions. I do not despise moral, but I don't see utility in moral questions. Laws I believe that is based in ethics and ethnics questions. But morals is a hard matter to solve in my life. Probably I'd like to counterargue, but, no I guess I'd better do not. Why? I believe your words of some difficulties that may impact on your decision. For me it's important not to skip such things. Instead of waving a sword and trying to persuade the vis-a-vis, I guess it will be much clever to have a couple of beers, eh? :) If I had a friend who was upset, for instance, the brokenhearted or kimda, I would be the last idiot if I let him being a listener of my dogmatic instructions. I mean if a person is needed to be heard, then it's clever to hear it. Such practices, as above, can be grouped as what a doctor (let's call him Doctor X) may perform. Doctor X practices as psychology so physiology (=medicine). Instead of curing patients he must listen to them. He does not want to become a doctor, he wants to be one of his patients (he doesn't change the level of talk, etc). So, you never know whether this person is a doctor, or not. Also, morality isn't necessary to be a list of rules for all times. I guess some inner type of relations it (the morality) must have to be what we may choose... Just another example: a boy loves a girl; the girl doesn't accept it. The boy is upset, he doesn't know what to do. So, he's planning to do something, yet not knowing what to expect. Ok, the boy can expect some reactions from the girl. The most important thing is to ask a boy what he really wants? Because if his plan will be failed, and he'll try to say something like "I had to choose the opposite way!" none of his answer will have sense. The most terrible truth is that we have to choose our lifeline or a way of life. Some says we are fully responsible, se says it's partially. Anyway, we are the one who make our fully or half choices. So, no morality implies no right ways... But how? Everything is senseless? We can't, being skeptical, claim it either. Having no clues about that "everything" we might allow it could be anything. Thus, that everything may be long and it might have no ends. And even this doesn't seem to be a strong argument to deny morality since our decisions depending on our vision of the situation. Okay, what I was going to say? I wanted to say denying morality wasn't good either. We don't know which morality is perfect, but we don't know whether denying of morality is okay. Instead of it, let's keep investigating it. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 30, 2020 16:43:56 GMT
Probably I'd like to counterargue, but, no I guess I'd better do not. Why? I believe your words of some difficulties that may impact on your decision. For me it's important not to skip such things. Instead of waving a sword and trying to persuade the vis-a-vis, I guess it will be much clever to have a couple of beers, eh?  If I had a friend who was upset, for instance, the brokenhearted or kimda, I would be the last idiot if I let him being a listener of my dogmatic instructions. I mean if a person is needed to be heard, then it's clever to hear it. Such practices, as above, can be grouped as what a doctor (let's call him Doctor X) may perform. Doctor X practices as psychology so physiology (=medicine). Instead of curing patients he must listen to them. He does not want to become a doctor, he wants to be one of his patients (he doesn't change the level of talk, etc). So, you never know whether this person is a doctor, or not. Also, morality isn't necessary to be a list of rules for all times. I guess some inner type of relations it (the morality) must have to be what we may choose... Just another example: a boy loves a girl; the girl doesn't accept it. The boy is upset, he doesn't know what to do. So, he's planning to do something, yet not knowing what to expect. Ok, the boy can expect some reactions from the girl. The most important thing is to ask a boy what he really wants? Because if his plan will be failed, and he'll try to say something like "I had to choose the opposite way!" none of his answer will have sense. The most terrible truth is that we have to choose our lifeline or a way of life. Some says we are fully responsible, se says it's partially. Anyway, we are the one who make our fully or half choices. So, no morality implies no right ways... But how? Everything is senseless? We can't, being skeptical, claim it either. Having no clues about that "everything" we might allow it could be anything. Thus, that everything may be long and it might have no ends. And even this doesn't seem to be a strong argument to deny morality since our decisions depending on our vision of the situation. Okay, what I was going to say? I wanted to say denying morality wasn't good either. We don't know which morality is perfect, but we don't know whether denying of morality is okay. Instead of it, let's keep investigating it.
I have problems of being something or as you says, follow a lifeline. But I believe that words that I found to say and elaborate that specifical thing will be a great help.
I cure much things by this process of expressing what I fell wrong. It is a hard thing to do, my emotions is every one out of the right place, and I have to cure that in some way.
It is a deep travel on the essence of my thoughts. It hurts a lot and I will endure, only because I want to endure, and for no other reason.
Shame on me I don't remember an example from literature to compare your feelings with the feelings of some heroes of novels or tales. Into my mind comes Percy Shelley, G. Byron and a monster Frankenstein. The first as the third one is about biography - the really hard life, and most of difficulties in it. Byron - in his journeys and thoughts. ...Oh, I also got another ones they are: Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and M. Styrner... Oh, yes, and also Charles Baudelaire. All of them said something about their feelings and I guess many of their thoughts, the great and remarkable thoughts, were being uttered or written in such a mood. So, I guess your creativity must have been released into the rhyme lines or poetry; or the muses which are behind your mood must be invited into some relevant works, I mean writing a novel or a script. I am sure you have to try yourself in something. Well, something tells me its yours. Idk what makes me think like that. I just feel it. |
|
