Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 7, 2020 2:31:10 GMT
The convergence and divergence of viewpoints, or rather self-evident truths as axioms, paradoxically lends itself to a viewpoint that supersedes the actions of philosophy as a whole thus summiting them under a single viewpoint.
In simpler terms the cycling of viewpoints, between a thesis and antithesis, is in itself a viewpoint of viewpoints.
This singular viewpoint, as the summation of a series of viewpoints, creates a paradox as no antithetical element to it can be presented other than a simple "no it is not true".
An anti-perspectivist stance can be promoted as a counter to this point, yet this in itself is a perspective, thus a contradiction occurs.
This contradiction is nothing other than a distinction of one point of view relative to another through a contrast.
In simpler terms the cycling of viewpoints, between a thesis and antithesis, is in itself a viewpoint of viewpoints.
This singular viewpoint, as the summation of a series of viewpoints, creates a paradox as no antithetical element to it can be presented other than a simple "no it is not true".
An anti-perspectivist stance can be promoted as a counter to this point, yet this in itself is a perspective, thus a contradiction occurs.
This contradiction is nothing other than a distinction of one point of view relative to another through a contrast.
