|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 7, 2020 2:09:18 GMT
1. The nature of proof is subject to the angle of awareness of the observer given it must connect with the observer.
2. Proof is a means of defining a specific set of relations given.
3. Proof is evidence and evidence is a body of facts.
4. The body of facts necessitates a group of facts existing as connected through a set.
5. In asking for proof one asks for the observation of connections between one phenomena and another.
6. The phenomenon of "connectivity" exists as beyond proof as a distinct phenemonena in itself which allows for proof to exist but as existing beyond proof as it is not limited to proof.
7. This connection results in form, or rather the shape through which phenomena exist.
8. The shape is the boundaries, or rather limits, through which something exists.
9. Proof is the application of limits thus what exists beyond limits, ie a point, is beyond proof.
10. Simultaneously proof as definition through the connection of boundaries, or limits, necessitates that proof is a subset to the phenomenon of form which exists beyond proof much in the same manner the phenomenon of connectivity exists as beyond proof.
|
|