Post by Eugene 2.0 on Sept 30, 2020 22:13:48 GMT
• If it would be possible to overthink everything, it - the result of overthinking - would be more than an experience of all the people
• If it would be possible to have lived (=to experience) all the lives, it would be more than a certain life
• If it would be possible to have lived (=to experience) a whole life, it would be more than each part of this life, taking into account, at least, two conditions: the experience would have been accumulated and it hadn't been circularly repeated
• Believed that later periods of a life one has more qualified experience, than earlier iff the previous conditions were taken
• Qualification is considered by the one as kinda levels or grades of his personality
• If a person seriously takes his accending to more higher levels of understanding implies the person takes also all the conditions above
• The one considers himself a person iff personality is something that has more higher level, and there's accending to those levels, and obviously the one has reached the relevant level
• Making himself an individualized person is to reject the certain experience, plus limiting it by some criteria
• It doesn't really important which criteria is aimed or what reasons are behind the reject, but an act of individualisation requires some experience sacrifices for nothing
• Not taking individualisation as the stop in advancing allows to assume as many as possible thoughts and views, according to the very condition above; there probably must be either highest levels (a) or all the experience of the one have to be taken together (b)
• (a) – this leads to the questions of if there's some, how to reach them and are there examples of it?
• (b) – this leads to rhetorical question: why the person individualize himself? For what purposes? And the most sane reason – there are no adequate reasons (c)
• (c) Self-limitation leads to nothing, but decreasing of experience, and, therefore, making understanding of things less clearer
• Probably, the process of individualisation is supposed to be the sign of the life of this (individualized) person is about to be ended
• Making himself individualized cannot be accepted anyone; the same as anyone cannot accept their death: it contradicts their inner intentions to live endlessly
• I guess that the alienation of himself is kinda the process of loosing any chances to go through the mental and metaphysical barriers; while the one's soul is calling for light, the one's making a step into darkness.
• If it would be possible to have lived (=to experience) all the lives, it would be more than a certain life
• If it would be possible to have lived (=to experience) a whole life, it would be more than each part of this life, taking into account, at least, two conditions: the experience would have been accumulated and it hadn't been circularly repeated
• Believed that later periods of a life one has more qualified experience, than earlier iff the previous conditions were taken
• Qualification is considered by the one as kinda levels or grades of his personality
• If a person seriously takes his accending to more higher levels of understanding implies the person takes also all the conditions above
• The one considers himself a person iff personality is something that has more higher level, and there's accending to those levels, and obviously the one has reached the relevant level
• Making himself an individualized person is to reject the certain experience, plus limiting it by some criteria
• It doesn't really important which criteria is aimed or what reasons are behind the reject, but an act of individualisation requires some experience sacrifices for nothing
• Not taking individualisation as the stop in advancing allows to assume as many as possible thoughts and views, according to the very condition above; there probably must be either highest levels (a) or all the experience of the one have to be taken together (b)
• (a) – this leads to the questions of if there's some, how to reach them and are there examples of it?
• (b) – this leads to rhetorical question: why the person individualize himself? For what purposes? And the most sane reason – there are no adequate reasons (c)
• (c) Self-limitation leads to nothing, but decreasing of experience, and, therefore, making understanding of things less clearer
• Probably, the process of individualisation is supposed to be the sign of the life of this (individualized) person is about to be ended
• Making himself individualized cannot be accepted anyone; the same as anyone cannot accept their death: it contradicts their inner intentions to live endlessly
• I guess that the alienation of himself is kinda the process of loosing any chances to go through the mental and metaphysical barriers; while the one's soul is calling for light, the one's making a step into darkness.
