Post by Eugene 2.0 on Sept 16, 2020 13:17:41 GMT
I'll try to defense the claim that it's not impossible or highly possible that people have mental fences, and those fences are more strong and durable, than material ones.
1. It's most likely that without our sense of fear we could never draw a line what is good and what is bad.
(Notice, I take the term almost equal to: "fear"~"feel of horror"~"being scared"~"be afraid of".)
We can have fear about our incompleted God's commandments or smth like that. We might be scared of not finished something, etc. The feeling is really important for people to hold their bad intentions at themselves. For instance, a racer would rather die quickly if he had no feel of fear: he just had smashed into the first turn, because of he did not care about what to do with himself.
Consequently, fear draw some limits.
2. What kinda of limits they are? Definitely, such limits don't have the same form as in math or geometry limits. These limits barely look like fences, but mental ones.
Some psychologists keep saying that within such mental barriers we are able to think. I don't really know whether it's true, however such barriers stop our actions in reality (whatever it is).
If a person has no such limits he probably is insane, or he's kinda beast or animal – a brainless person. Because, as we shew it above, the racer with no mental limits in his head can easily be smashed up. We have to know where the limits to have some knowledge, and, in turn, to know something without having no mental barriers is senseless.
3. Therefore our knowledge is being grounded by some (mental) limitations is knowledge, and there's no knowledge for a mental unlimited mind. Such mind doesn't even know where to stop – such a person, if the limits must begin earlier in time and space, doesn't have no feel of need to be limited also.
All that intuitively lead us to the thought that being mentally limited is sufficient and necessary for us to be able to have any knowledge. It's like similar to have place where info will be put, or to have memory – special formed place for information.
4. So, an ability of memory allows us to gain knowledge, and it allows us to use it too. Then we extract and recover some info from pointed previously places (supposedly it happens intuitively), and mentally we become the ones who are use gathered pieces of something (i.e. info) together by using it as premises or judgements.
Limits help us with this process in a same way it does the Turing's machine: it processually ends exactly when limits end. Hence, the barriers in our head work pretty well. Again there's no chance to cheat them or break them outside, because the process of limitation is without our own control: Wittgenstein – it's logically impossible to get out (make a leap) the own language to repair it from the outside.
5. Any material barriers are temporary. There's always a chance to break it through. And mental barriers are much harder. Let's conclude it in an example:
If one needs to break a material barrier (=to cross the limits), he firstly has to be able to break his mental limits that control this action. Else, in case breaking the barrier happen accidentally, the experiment has another point and it isn't relevant to our case.
1. It's most likely that without our sense of fear we could never draw a line what is good and what is bad.
(Notice, I take the term almost equal to: "fear"~"feel of horror"~"being scared"~"be afraid of".)
We can have fear about our incompleted God's commandments or smth like that. We might be scared of not finished something, etc. The feeling is really important for people to hold their bad intentions at themselves. For instance, a racer would rather die quickly if he had no feel of fear: he just had smashed into the first turn, because of he did not care about what to do with himself.
Consequently, fear draw some limits.
2. What kinda of limits they are? Definitely, such limits don't have the same form as in math or geometry limits. These limits barely look like fences, but mental ones.
Some psychologists keep saying that within such mental barriers we are able to think. I don't really know whether it's true, however such barriers stop our actions in reality (whatever it is).
If a person has no such limits he probably is insane, or he's kinda beast or animal – a brainless person. Because, as we shew it above, the racer with no mental limits in his head can easily be smashed up. We have to know where the limits to have some knowledge, and, in turn, to know something without having no mental barriers is senseless.
3. Therefore our knowledge is being grounded by some (mental) limitations is knowledge, and there's no knowledge for a mental unlimited mind. Such mind doesn't even know where to stop – such a person, if the limits must begin earlier in time and space, doesn't have no feel of need to be limited also.
All that intuitively lead us to the thought that being mentally limited is sufficient and necessary for us to be able to have any knowledge. It's like similar to have place where info will be put, or to have memory – special formed place for information.
4. So, an ability of memory allows us to gain knowledge, and it allows us to use it too. Then we extract and recover some info from pointed previously places (supposedly it happens intuitively), and mentally we become the ones who are use gathered pieces of something (i.e. info) together by using it as premises or judgements.
Limits help us with this process in a same way it does the Turing's machine: it processually ends exactly when limits end. Hence, the barriers in our head work pretty well. Again there's no chance to cheat them or break them outside, because the process of limitation is without our own control: Wittgenstein – it's logically impossible to get out (make a leap) the own language to repair it from the outside.
5. Any material barriers are temporary. There's always a chance to break it through. And mental barriers are much harder. Let's conclude it in an example:
If one needs to break a material barrier (=to cross the limits), he firstly has to be able to break his mental limits that control this action. Else, in case breaking the barrier happen accidentally, the experiment has another point and it isn't relevant to our case.