|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 22, 2020 3:26:21 GMT
To generalize a series of phenomenom under x is to reduce the series of phenomenon to a particular given that x as a general must now relate to further generals thus acts as a particular. All phenomenon are both generals and particulars simultaneously as two different things in two different respects.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 22, 2020 11:23:44 GMT
Vice versa works as well.
Assuming a general x we assume everything to it, and that everything includes to x. So, any x taken as general isn't only supposed as a general statement, but includes to it everything else as a possible variety of till unknown nature. We never reach to anything general not having such an ability to access it - everything. It might be seen either as an access to future researches, investigations, speculations, or as something really interesting that has a form that allows us to access it. However, it's not the form what gives us in that x everything else, but the thought of generality, an idea of it plus form of it together (inseparably). The last one must be obvious from the fact that if x gives us all, x gives us forms and ideas as well.
|
|
