|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 21, 2020 3:05:42 GMT
Each number is an act of observation itself given it is a division or multiplication of a phenomenon through the angle of the observer. To divide an orange into x parts necessitates the observer to form the orange in accords to the mode of observation.
In simpler terms x is projected onto the orange by the observer and divided as such. The same applies to the number line if not more so given the line is a perpetually finite number approaching infinity, thus is always changing in accords to what number is being observed by the observer.
All numbers are modes of change given that the equivocate to a variety of phenomenon through which they are counted. For example in counting 1 horse we observe 1 as equivocating to not just a phenomenon that changes through time and space but also 1 as equivocating to a variety of other phenomenon, such as a jet, therefore necessitating 1 as a mode of change.
It equates to a variety of phenomenon thus is always changing, and what it equates to directly goes through a mode of change as well.
Relative to a number such as Pi it is an irrational (or transcendental) number which is perpetually changing thus causing the line to expand or contract given each set of digits observed is a new fraction of the line. Given Pi's infinite regress to fractions (and fractals of the number line) each position is a result of the number being observed. All numbers are the means in which change is observed as a mode of perception.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 22, 2020 11:30:09 GMT
Is 1 a necessary factor of changing? Could 2 as a phenomenon be taken as such a factor?
Do an observer's optic (or vision?) influence on appearance of 1? In other words, an observer's view is what "allows" 1 to exist?
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 22, 2020 17:14:26 GMT
Is 1 a necessary factor of changing? Could 2 as a phenomenon be taken as such a factor? Do an observer's optic (or vision?) influence on appearance of 1? In other words, an observer's view is what "allows" 1 to exist? 2 is a recursion of 1. 1 appears as a loop both in its functions, where all numbers are repetitions of 1, and dually where all phenomenon are loops given they are traceable as loops. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 24, 2020 6:06:43 GMT
I agreed with almost all of that but I don't think the change part happens each time. For example, you can divide an apple into 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. The more you divide it into the smaller the pieces get. But you can't divide an apple into 1 expecting a change. You literally do nothing. So as long as you don't divide by 1 or 0 there will be a change.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 24, 2020 17:13:09 GMT
I agreed with almost all of that but I don't think the change part happens each time. For example, you can divide an apple into 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. The more you divide it into the smaller the pieces get. But you can't divide an apple into 1 expecting a change. You literally do nothing. So as long as you don't divide by 1 or 0 there will be a change. In dividing an apple into 2,3,4,5...etc. pieces is to divide the apple into singular entities in themselves given each piece is equivalent to one. One cannot be observed on its own terms except through other ones thus necessitating each individual piece as empty in itself. This can be seen in a line where the line cannot be observed except in relation to other lines which it both composes and is composed of. Dually this same nature can be seen in 0, through a 0d point, where the point on its own terms cannot be observed given it is fundamentally nothing. The point is observed through its progression to another point with this progression resulting in the form of a line. In 0 progressing to 0 an equation of 0=0 occurs which is embodied spatially under the line. This 0=0 results in the first one given the line as a quantifiable entity begins its existence. One begins it equivocation to another one, as 1=1, when the line changes into another line through the 0d point. Even then the point is only observed as the change from one line into another and as such is not so much a thing in itself but rather a mode of change Thus 0=0 progresses to 1=1, as formlessness into form, where this equivocation is expressed under x=x given equality under the symbol of "=" occurs through a repetition of said phenomenon. Equality is only observed through repetition. Under one portion x=x is the equivocation of forms, in another respect it is an equivocation of changes (formlessness) thus necessitating x as a variable equivalent to both form and change. One as intrinsically empty in itself can be observed under the line fundamentally as a sideways loop, given its beginning and end points are the same 0d point as 0=0, thus necessitating 1 contains zero much in the same manner a loop contains emptiness. This empty nature of 1=1 occurs through its equivalence to the variable of x=x which further equivocates 1 to 0 given both 0 and 1, through the number line, are equivalent to x=x. In simpler terms the number 1 as an empty loop contains 0=0; thus 1 is a mode of change to further numbers given it cannot exist on its own terms due to its premise being grounded in the emptiness of zero. Zero cannot be observed on it's own terms given it is nothing, and with the number 1 being grounded in this same nature it follows 0 as a mode of change given 1 must change into another 1 if it is to exist. 1 as empty is 1 as a mode of change to further 1. Form contains formlessness, as evidenced through the loop, and this formlessness is the means of change into another form. 1 is an empty loop evidenced by the line containing 0d points because it contains other lines and the fact the line contains both the same beginning and end points as the 0d point. 1 as an empty loop is 1 equating to 0 given all numbers change to further numbers, all ones change into further ones, due to their empty nature. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 26, 2020 14:03:23 GMT
OMG, it's tough, but excellent as an exercise of translation Philosophical texts in English to another one.
|
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Aug 30, 2020 21:26:22 GMT
I agreed with almost all of that but I don't think the change part happens each time. For example, you can divide an apple into 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. The more you divide it into the smaller the pieces get. But you can't divide an apple into 1 expecting a change. You literally do nothing. So as long as you don't divide by 1 or 0 there will be a change. In dividing an apple into 2,3,4,5...etc. pieces is to divide the apple into singular entities in themselves given each piece is equivalent to one. One cannot be observed on its own terms except through other ones thus necessitating each individual piece as empty in itself. This can be seen in a line where the line cannot be observed except in relation to other lines which it both composes and is composed of. Dually this same nature can be seen in 0, through a 0d point, where the point on its own terms cannot be observed given it is fundamentally nothing. The point is observed through its progression to another point with this progression resulting in the form of a line. In 0 progressing to 0 an equation of 0=0 occurs which is embodied spatially under the line. This 0=0 results in the first one given the line as a quantifiable entity begins its existence. One begins it equivocation to another one, as 1=1, when the line changes into another line through the 0d point. Even then the point is only observed as the change from one line into another and as such is not so much a thing in itself but rather a mode of change Thus 0=0 progresses to 1=1, as formlessness into form, where this equivocation is expressed under x=x given equality under the symbol of "=" occurs through a repetition of said phenomenon. Equality is only observed through repetition. Under one portion x=x is the equivocation of forms, in another respect it is an equivocation of changes (formlessness) thus necessitating x as a variable equivalent to both form and change. One as intrinsically empty in itself can be observed under the line fundamentally as a sideways loop, given its beginning and end points are the same 0d point as 0=0, thus necessitating 1 contains zero much in the same manner a loop contains emptiness. This empty nature of 1=1 occurs through its equivalence to the variable of x=x which further equivocates 1 to 0 given both 0 and 1, through the number line, are equivalent to x=x. In simpler terms the number 1 as an empty loop contains 0=0; thus 1 is a mode of change to further numbers given it cannot exist on its own terms due to its premise being grounded in the emptiness of zero. Zero cannot be observed on it's own terms given it is nothing, and with the number 1 being grounded in this same nature it follows 0 as a mode of change given 1 must change into another 1 if it is to exist. 1 as empty is 1 as a mode of change to further 1. Form contains formlessness, as evidenced through the loop, and this formlessness is the means of change into another form. 1 is an empty loop evidenced by the line containing 0d points because it contains other lines and the fact the line contains both the same beginning and end points as the 0d point. 1 as an empty loop is 1 equating to 0 given all numbers change to further numbers, all ones change into further ones, due to their empty nature. The " 0" Is Far More Complex Than That, You Can Observe The True Intelligence Of The " 0" By Separating The " 36" From The " 0" In 360 Degrees. The 360 Degrees Of A " Circle" Reflects The Shape Of The " 0", Indicating These Numbers Are Self-Intelligent Fragments Of The Cosmos. The Precession Cycle Of The 12 Zodiac Signs = 25920 Years, Which Is 36 x 360 + 360 x 36. If White " Reflects" All Colors, And Black " Absorbs" All Colors, Then We Can Suggest That The Universe Has A Container For Each Of Its Aspects. The " 0" Is The Container, It Holds All Numbers From 1~9, Meaning "0" Is The Equivalent Of "45". Therefore " 360" Degrees Of A Circle Is 3645, Thus 3645 - 2020 = 1625. 16 x 25 + 16 + 25 = 441, The " Quartz Crystal" Is Associated With The Number 441 (21 x 21), And 21 + 21 = 42, The Answer To Life. The End Is Year 2020 ( Purrfect Vision). The Painting Of Sheba Was Finished In Year 1620 ( 36 x 45). 1620 + 20 x 20 Years = Year 2020. The Name " The Queen Of Sheba" In Hebrew = 398, The Number 398 In PI (Circle) Appears At Position 2020 ( 2020 Is The Final Year, Full Circle).  |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 31, 2020 2:27:06 GMT
In dividing an apple into 2,3,4,5...etc. pieces is to divide the apple into singular entities in themselves given each piece is equivalent to one. One cannot be observed on its own terms except through other ones thus necessitating each individual piece as empty in itself. This can be seen in a line where the line cannot be observed except in relation to other lines which it both composes and is composed of. Dually this same nature can be seen in 0, through a 0d point, where the point on its own terms cannot be observed given it is fundamentally nothing. The point is observed through its progression to another point with this progression resulting in the form of a line. In 0 progressing to 0 an equation of 0=0 occurs which is embodied spatially under the line. This 0=0 results in the first one given the line as a quantifiable entity begins its existence. One begins it equivocation to another one, as 1=1, when the line changes into another line through the 0d point. Even then the point is only observed as the change from one line into another and as such is not so much a thing in itself but rather a mode of change Thus 0=0 progresses to 1=1, as formlessness into form, where this equivocation is expressed under x=x given equality under the symbol of "=" occurs through a repetition of said phenomenon. Equality is only observed through repetition. Under one portion x=x is the equivocation of forms, in another respect it is an equivocation of changes (formlessness) thus necessitating x as a variable equivalent to both form and change. One as intrinsically empty in itself can be observed under the line fundamentally as a sideways loop, given its beginning and end points are the same 0d point as 0=0, thus necessitating 1 contains zero much in the same manner a loop contains emptiness. This empty nature of 1=1 occurs through its equivalence to the variable of x=x which further equivocates 1 to 0 given both 0 and 1, through the number line, are equivalent to x=x. In simpler terms the number 1 as an empty loop contains 0=0; thus 1 is a mode of change to further numbers given it cannot exist on its own terms due to its premise being grounded in the emptiness of zero. Zero cannot be observed on it's own terms given it is nothing, and with the number 1 being grounded in this same nature it follows 0 as a mode of change given 1 must change into another 1 if it is to exist. 1 as empty is 1 as a mode of change to further 1. Form contains formlessness, as evidenced through the loop, and this formlessness is the means of change into another form. 1 is an empty loop evidenced by the line containing 0d points because it contains other lines and the fact the line contains both the same beginning and end points as the 0d point. 1 as an empty loop is 1 equating to 0 given all numbers change to further numbers, all ones change into further ones, due to their empty nature. The " 0" Is Far More Complex Than That, You Can Observe The True Intelligence Of The " 0" By Separating The " 36" From The " 0" In 360 Degrees. The 360 Degrees Of A " Circle" Reflects The Shape Of The " 0", Indicating These Numbers Are Self-Intelligent Fragments Of The Cosmos. The Precession Cycle Of The 12 Zodiac Signs = 25920 Years, Which Is 36 x 360 + 360 x 36. If White " Reflects" All Colors, And Black " Absorbs" All Colors, Then We Can Suggest That The Universe Has A Container For Each Of Its Aspects. The " 0" Is The Container, It Holds All Numbers From 1~9, Meaning "0" Is The Equivalent Of "45". Therefore " 360" Degrees Of A Circle Is 3645, Thus 3645 - 2020 = 1625. 16 x 25 + 16 + 25 = 441, The " Quartz Crystal" Is Associated With The Number 441 (21 x 21), And 21 + 21 = 42, The Answer To Life. The End Is Year 2020 ( Purrfect Vision). The Painting Of Sheba Was Finished In Year 1620 ( 36 x 45). 1620 + 20 x 20 Years = Year 2020. The Name " The Queen Of Sheba" In Hebrew = 398, The Number 398 In PI (Circle) Appears At Position 2020 ( 2020 Is The Final Year, Full Circle). How did you get 45 from that? |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Aug 31, 2020 2:38:09 GMT
The " 0" Is Far More Complex Than That, You Can Observe The True Intelligence Of The " 0" By Separating The " 36" From The " 0" In 360 Degrees. The 360 Degrees Of A " Circle" Reflects The Shape Of The " 0", Indicating These Numbers Are Self-Intelligent Fragments Of The Cosmos. The Precession Cycle Of The 12 Zodiac Signs = 25920 Years, Which Is 36 x 360 + 360 x 36. If White " Reflects" All Colors, And Black " Absorbs" All Colors, Then We Can Suggest That The Universe Has A Container For Each Of Its Aspects. The " 0" Is The Container, It Holds All Numbers From 1~9, Meaning "0" Is The Equivalent Of "45". Therefore " 360" Degrees Of A Circle Is 3645, Thus 3645 - 2020 = 1625. 16 x 25 + 16 + 25 = 441, The " Quartz Crystal" Is Associated With The Number 441 (21 x 21), And 21 + 21 = 42, The Answer To Life. The End Is Year 2020 ( Purrfect Vision). The Painting Of Sheba Was Finished In Year 1620 ( 36 x 45). 1620 + 20 x 20 Years = Year 2020. The Name " The Queen Of Sheba" In Hebrew = 398, The Number 398 In PI (Circle) Appears At Position 2020 ( 2020 Is The Final Year, Full Circle). How did you get 45 from that? . I Noticed That Black Absorbs All Colors, And White Reflects All Colors, So I Thought, " What If The 0 Is A Container For All The Numbers The Universe Can Compute?", This Lead To The Discovery That " 0" Is A Substitute For " 45". Hence: 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 = " 45". Think About It, " 0", Zero-Point, The " Last President" Is The " 45"th President, This Goes Much Deeper Than What This World Taught. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 31, 2020 2:41:46 GMT
How did you get 45 from that? . I Noticed That Black Absorbs All Colors, And White Reflects All Colors, So I Thought, " What If The 0 Is A Container For All The Numbers The Universe Can Compute?", This Lead To The Discovery That " 0" Is A Substitute For " 45". Hence: 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 = " 45". Think About It, " 0", Zero-Point, The " Last President" Is The " 45"th President, This Goes Much Deeper Than What This World Taught. Ah. So you just added numbers 1-9. I was thinking it was because if you separate 45 and do 4+5 you'll get 9. But your explanation works better. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Aug 31, 2020 2:47:21 GMT
By Extensively Knowing The Universe's Clockwork. I Noticed That Black Absorbs All Colors, And White Reflects All Colors, So I Thought, " What If The 0 Is A Container For All The Numbers The Universe Can Compute?", This Lead To The Discovery That " 0" Is A Substitute For " 45". Hence: 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 = " 45". Think About It, " 0", Zero-Point, The " Last President" Is The " 45"th President, This Goes Much Deeper Than What This World Taught. Ah. So you just added numbers 1-9. I was thinking it was because if you separate 45 and do 4+5 you'll get 9. But your explanation works better. The " 0" Is The Center Of The " Vesica Piscis", The " Womb Of GOD". 0 Is The Womb That Gives Birth To 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9, A Total Of " 45". Then 4 x 5 x 4 x 5 + 4 + 5 + 4 + 5 = 418, The Vertical And Horizontal Dimension Of The " Womb Of GOD".  |
|
