|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 20, 2020 2:54:03 GMT
A point is that which is absent of any form or volume, it can only be observed as the change of one phenomenon to another. Phenomenon composed of points are composed of change.
An example of this would be the line. The point observes the change of one line into another line.
Another example would be all phenomenon resulting in points. An object at a distance is reduced to a point. An object up close is reduced to points. The change in one position of a phenomenon to another results in the phenomenon expanding an contracting from a point. The expansion or contraction of a phenomenon is reduced to (a) point(s) where the point is the median of change from one phenomenon to another.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 20, 2020 7:31:47 GMT
You mean sorta glimpsing lines/points?
It's like, yo know, if an eye is watching a point, the last is seen only if the rays are fluctuating by small portions. So, it's the as to say the registration of what is seen can be done hopefully only in case of signals/pauses sheme or changing constantly... (I don't know the right verb...)... well, it's done only if this act is being registrated and the act is indeed registrated when the phenomena of a point can be compared to the emptiness of it, and so on, and so on.
That's why the registration act is going on all the time, so i.e. phenomena of the point changes to its emptiness and then it shows again... and then it all repeats.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 21, 2020 3:02:29 GMT
The observation of a phenomenon, linear or not, contracting and expanding from a point necessitates a quantifiable entity contracting or expanding from this very same point. All numbers, as grounded in the quantification of forms, expand and contract from a simple point where the point is the means of change from one quantifiable form into another.
This is best expressed through the line where each point is a position of change from one line into another. This change from one line into another results in the recursion of line where it exists as fractals. Each fractal is both 1/x of the original line, as both a fractal and fraction, and dually is x number of whole lines when each line is viewed individually. The position of points necessitates the one line resulting in further line segments, each being infinite in length considering they are composed of further lines as units. The position of the point observes the line changing into further lines through itself where the line exists through a circular self referentiality that occurs through the 0d point. The 0d point is the line changing into another line with this line circularit self referencing itself through fractions much in the same manner a being manifests in a new variation of itself, yet is still itself, when faced with a complete absence or annihilation of the very same being.
The line as composed of points is the line composed of change where this change is a reflection of the angle of awareness of the observer in selectively seeing a series of finite entities or rather in seeing a different number of finite numbers each time the line is observed. The line is a projection of the number the observer manifests through a selective perception.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 21, 2020 8:36:30 GMT
So, only seeing it in general, in all the respects with the other types of observation, I'm able to see it as a line?
|
|