|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 18, 2020 1:01:14 GMT
A unit is a means of equivocating an abstract symbol to another phenomenon. It is a means of equivocation.
In equivocating one phenomenon to another is to reorder one phenomenon into the likes and form of another. Equivocation is recursion as an act of copying. That which is measured is reordered into the mode of measurement.
For example in dividing an orange into x number of parts is to manifest the orange as copying what x is in form where the orange exists as an image of x.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 22, 2020 11:34:21 GMT
Which unit? x?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 22, 2020 17:15:19 GMT
X is a unit that represents a number or a label.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Sept 1, 2020 1:38:49 GMT
Why would you say it's copying? Copying would suggest making an identical copy of something. But with the abstract symbol transitioning into another phenomenon it isn't a copy but a change.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 1, 2020 15:50:29 GMT
Why would you say it's copying? Copying would suggest making an identical copy of something. But with the abstract symbol transitioning into another phenomenon it isn't a copy but a change. 2+2=4 observes the equivocation of two seemingly different sets of symbols through 1. The act of equivocation observes seemingly different phenomenon unite through a medial term. The same occurs within the process of equating one symbol to another phenomenon, the median is the observer pointing to the phenomenon where both the symbol and the phenomenon equivocate through a common observer.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Sept 1, 2020 16:49:29 GMT
Why would you say it's copying? Copying would suggest making an identical copy of something. But with the abstract symbol transitioning into another phenomenon it isn't a copy but a change. 2+2=4 observes the equivocation of two seemingly different sets of symbols through 1. The act of equivocation observes seemingly different phenomenon unite through a medial term. The same occurs within the process of equating one symbol to another phenomenon, the median is the observer pointing to the phenomenon where both the symbol and the phenomenon equivocate through a common observer. Yes, but that is an example of a set. In your original post you made it seem that one symbol, as in singular, goes through it as in 2=4 not 2+2=4. But yes of we copy the same symbol and make it a set then it does work 3+3=6, 4+4=8, etc.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 2, 2020 2:52:08 GMT
2+2=4 observes the equivocation of two seemingly different sets of symbols through 1. The act of equivocation observes seemingly different phenomenon unite through a medial term. The same occurs within the process of equating one symbol to another phenomenon, the median is the observer pointing to the phenomenon where both the symbol and the phenomenon equivocate through a common observer. Yes, but that is an example of a set. In your original post you made it seem that one symbol, as in singular, goes through it as in 2=4 not 2+2=4. But yes of we copy the same symbol and make it a set then it does work 3+3=6, 4+4=8, etc. For example in dividing an orange into x number of parts is to manifest the orange as copying what x is in form where the orange exists as an image of x.
|
|