|
|
Post by karl on Aug 10, 2020 17:45:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 10, 2020 21:40:21 GMT
This is a perfect example to show how abstract and empty such ideals as the communism or lenninism-marxism are. Communism is a mask for dictatorship acts. Instead of communism there can be anything else. But communism is a dangerous idea. It was ruining societies making them be like USSR and China.
|
|
|
|
Post by karl on Aug 11, 2020 5:56:29 GMT
This is a perfect example to show how abstract and empty such ideals as the communism or lenninism-marxism are. Communism is a mask for dictatorship acts. Instead of communism there can be anything else. But communism is a dangerous idea. It was ruining societies making them be like USSR and China.
Yes. What all ideologies have in common is that they offer a superficial description of the world's problems and their solutions, which can be summed up in slogans so simple that everyone can feel they understand them without having to bother with any real analysis. Once Communists control the narrative, they can present it as being a choice between equality, represented by them, and inequality, represented by everyone else. Back in the 30's, they even referred to social democrats as fascists, for everyone who weren't communists like themselves were upholding the oppression of the working class, through capitalism or fascism or both.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 11, 2020 7:36:16 GMT
"Back in the 30's, they even referred to social democrats as fascists, for everyone who weren't communists like themselves were upholding the oppression of the working class, through capitalism or fascism or both" - This is exactly what happened there.
Now Russia tries to sure everyone that it's a delusion or a bad interpretation, but the actions of Putin's Moscow (the actions of a former KGB officer) disprove it crystally, especially when it's clearly seen how hypocrite thet are ar their intrusion to US's elections, poisoning their former comrades, using doping in the sports, etc.
They lied one hundred years ago, and they do it again with a changed tactics - to refute and deny of any mass belief or faith. I would say they are more dangerous today than 100 years ago, because their lie has no ideological range. For instance, if at those times they would do something that might contradict to the commie's ideology it would be uneasier for them to disaffirm their actions. No there's no limits of the lie they've got.
People'd been brainwashed then, now somr media resources and law, jury politics, etc continue this tradition. They say Fox News produces much of lie, I see no reason to unbelieve that. Lie even could have been stronger...
|
|
