Post by jonbain on May 5, 2020 11:58:07 GMT
More proof that the 'science' of the establishment is dead:
The difference between the Newtonian predictions for Mercury's orbit and observations of that orbit, were said to be reconciled by Einstein's theory of Relativity.
This is the famous Perihelion Precession of Mercury. Perihelion is the position of furthest extremity from the Sun. The value in question is the amount that the perihelion advances a little each orbit. This is typically measured over a century.
However, each one of Mercury's Perihelion Precessions is not a standard uniform amount. The OGS15 algorithm demonstrates that each individual Perihelion fluctuates forwards and backwards by -40 to +80 arc-seconds per year. Almost identical data is also evident in NASA's horizon Ephemeris.
Einstein claimed that his theory would account for a movement of 0.43 arc-seconds per year, or 43 arc-seconds per century to Mercury's Perihelion.
It should be easy to see that simply choosing one particular starting orbit will easily accommodate Einstein's prediction, or nullify it, depending which orbit is the starting orbit. A single orbit yielding +80 arc-seconds per year is double the amount that Einstein claimed for his theory for a century! His entire theory fits easily inside the error-margin within the one century sample size of the methodology.
But that is just one reason.
Moreover, the Relativists have miscalculated what Newtonian gravity predicts for Mercury's Perihelion Precession anyway. They simply ignore the fact that the orbit is inclined by 7 degrees, and thus it should be a calculation in three dimensions of space. Einstein and his cronies only ever did their calculations on a crude flat two dimensional model using pencil and paper approximations.
What I show in the OGS15 evolutionary 3D algorithm is that by including the Z-axis, the resultant values of Perihelion Precession change by an amount of 63 arc-seconds per century. This is also greater than that falsely attributed to Einstein.
So we can see that Relativity is 'science of the gaps' for two quite different reasons just within the context of Mercury's Perihelion Precession. All Einstein did, was to claim that his formula fits the gap. At no point has he even properly calculated the Newtonian math.
Previous chapters show the numerous contradictions within his own formulae, besides this. He simply relies on the laziness in the reader, and the deceitful nature of some to pretend that they 'understand' his nonsensical sophistry. And for 100 years, that is what academia has sucked up and spewed out.
The full article, including the OGS15 algorithm, as well as the essential formula for 3D-gravity for multiple body systems is available at this link:
www.flight-light-and-spin.com/n-body/gravity.htm
Well that was 2 years of my life. No doubt the typical reader is going to disagree with me on the basis of a two minute casual glance.
The difference between the Newtonian predictions for Mercury's orbit and observations of that orbit, were said to be reconciled by Einstein's theory of Relativity.
This is the famous Perihelion Precession of Mercury. Perihelion is the position of furthest extremity from the Sun. The value in question is the amount that the perihelion advances a little each orbit. This is typically measured over a century.
However, each one of Mercury's Perihelion Precessions is not a standard uniform amount. The OGS15 algorithm demonstrates that each individual Perihelion fluctuates forwards and backwards by -40 to +80 arc-seconds per year. Almost identical data is also evident in NASA's horizon Ephemeris.
Einstein claimed that his theory would account for a movement of 0.43 arc-seconds per year, or 43 arc-seconds per century to Mercury's Perihelion.
It should be easy to see that simply choosing one particular starting orbit will easily accommodate Einstein's prediction, or nullify it, depending which orbit is the starting orbit. A single orbit yielding +80 arc-seconds per year is double the amount that Einstein claimed for his theory for a century! His entire theory fits easily inside the error-margin within the one century sample size of the methodology.
But that is just one reason.
Moreover, the Relativists have miscalculated what Newtonian gravity predicts for Mercury's Perihelion Precession anyway. They simply ignore the fact that the orbit is inclined by 7 degrees, and thus it should be a calculation in three dimensions of space. Einstein and his cronies only ever did their calculations on a crude flat two dimensional model using pencil and paper approximations.
What I show in the OGS15 evolutionary 3D algorithm is that by including the Z-axis, the resultant values of Perihelion Precession change by an amount of 63 arc-seconds per century. This is also greater than that falsely attributed to Einstein.
So we can see that Relativity is 'science of the gaps' for two quite different reasons just within the context of Mercury's Perihelion Precession. All Einstein did, was to claim that his formula fits the gap. At no point has he even properly calculated the Newtonian math.
Previous chapters show the numerous contradictions within his own formulae, besides this. He simply relies on the laziness in the reader, and the deceitful nature of some to pretend that they 'understand' his nonsensical sophistry. And for 100 years, that is what academia has sucked up and spewed out.
The full article, including the OGS15 algorithm, as well as the essential formula for 3D-gravity for multiple body systems is available at this link:
www.flight-light-and-spin.com/n-body/gravity.htm
Well that was 2 years of my life. No doubt the typical reader is going to disagree with me on the basis of a two minute casual glance.