|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 12, 2020 22:52:18 GMT
The sun and moon are both equal through having color and round shapes.
The sun and moon are unequal as having different colors and different surfaces to the shapes.
The sun and moon are simultaneously equal and unequal.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 14, 2020 2:45:07 GMT
The framework is always right and wrong given context.
For example:
1. (Einstein is alive) =T/F
2. (Einstein is alive in the 21st century as an idea) = T but potential F
3. (Einstein is alive in the 21st century) = F but potential T
Numbers 2 and 3 are also simultaneously true and false given a larger context. For a truth value to change all one has to do is change the context, thus truth value always requires a potential truth value as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Mar 19, 2020 13:44:26 GMT
The sun and moon are both equal through having color and round shapes. The sun and moon are unequal as having different colors and different surfaces to the shapes. The sun and moon are simultaneously equal and unequal. But if you add up equal to unequal the final result will be unequal. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 19, 2020 21:48:45 GMT
The sun and moon are both equal through having color and round shapes. The sun and moon are unequal as having different colors and different surfaces to the shapes. The sun and moon are simultaneously equal and unequal. But if you add up equal to unequal the final result will be unequal. The number of contexts through which the phenomenon equivocates is irrelevant to the fact that under certain contexts equivocation occurs. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 23, 2020 19:57:28 GMT
The framework is always right and wrong given context. For example: 1. (Einstein is alive) =T/F 2. (Einstein is alive in the 21st century as an idea) = T but potential F 3. (Einstein is alive in the 21st century) = F but potential T Numbers 2 and 3 are also simultaneously true and false given a larger context. For a truth value to change all one has to do is change the context, thus truth value always requires a potential truth value as well. n. (Einstein is alive, and 2+2=4; 2+3=5; the Earth is ellipsis; English alphabet contains 26 letter... - all the knowledge are gathered, and all the world is described) = T, because of the largest context. No. It's not truth at all. It's just a mess of info. We are the ones who see any sequences. We don't know anything about the aliens from the outer space. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 23, 2020 22:03:06 GMT
The framework is always right and wrong given context. For example: 1. (Einstein is alive) =T/F 2. (Einstein is alive in the 21st century as an idea) = T but potential F 3. (Einstein is alive in the 21st century) = F but potential T Numbers 2 and 3 are also simultaneously true and false given a larger context. For a truth value to change all one has to do is change the context, thus truth value always requires a potential truth value as well. n. (Einstein is alive, and 2+2=4; 2+3=5; the Earth is ellipsis; English alphabet contains 26 letter... - all the knowledge are gathered, and all the world is described) = T, because of the largest context. No. It's not truth at all. It's just a mess of info. We are the ones who see any sequences. We don't know anything about the aliens from the outer space. It is true given the context in which it is presented. Addressing the nature of language, the Alphabet as having 26 letters is an appropriate context. Given the nature of numbers the alphabet as having 26 letters is also true. Given the nature of politics the alphabet as having 26 letters is appropriate for spelling out a speech. All contexts mediate to a further context. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 23, 2020 22:27:29 GMT
n. (Einstein is alive, and 2+2=4; 2+3=5; the Earth is ellipsis; English alphabet contains 26 letter... - all the knowledge are gathered, and all the world is described) = T, because of the largest context. No. It's not truth at all. It's just a mess of info. We are the ones who see any sequences. We don't know anything about the aliens from the outer space. It is true given the context in which it is presented. Addressing the nature of language, the Alphabet as having 26 letters is an appropriate context. Given the nature of numbers the alphabet as having 26 letters is also true. Given the nature of politics the alphabet as having 26 letters is appropriate for spelling out a speech. All contexts mediate to a further context. I apologize for my English. I didn't want to say that. All I wanted to say that if it was assumed that Einstein was alive and we added to this all the possible knowledge we had it would be just large disjunction. That's all. Context is usage. We cannot just assume to get smth from the context. And it must work this time, because we've assumed everything, transforming the premise into kinda tautology. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 23, 2020 22:32:56 GMT
It is true given the context in which it is presented. Addressing the nature of language, the Alphabet as having 26 letters is an appropriate context. Given the nature of numbers the alphabet as having 26 letters is also true. Given the nature of politics the alphabet as having 26 letters is appropriate for spelling out a speech. All contexts mediate to a further context. I apologize for my English. I didn't want to say that. All I wanted to say that if it was assumed that Einstein was alive and we added to this all the possible knowledge we had it would be just large disjunction. That's all. Context is usage. We cannot just assume to get smth from the context. And it must work this time, because we've assumed everything, transforming the premise into kinda tautology. All contexts are true as existing. |
|
