|
|
9/11
Sept 19, 2019 6:41:33 GMT
Post by Elizabeth on Sept 19, 2019 6:41:33 GMT
No one really talks about this but it's out there.
The US listed the names of the people who hijacked the planes and crashed them. They said they were suicidal and died that day
But based on the list of names they gave of the hijackers...theres stuff that doesn't add up.
Most (if not all) of the people listed are alive and well living in their countries. They're saying they never hijacked anything and that the US made up lies about this.
What is going on?
|
|
antrise
Full Member
Posts: 168
Likes: 3
|
9/11
Sept 22, 2019 7:31:21 GMT
Post by antrise on Sept 22, 2019 7:31:21 GMT
Fetus is not a species. Fetus is not an organism. Fetus is an age. Calling an age group such as fetus, or the elderly parasites is hate speech. Blocking opposition of such hate speech is totalitarianism. pair. two identical, similar, or corresponding things that are matched for use together:
The provision amending the Uniform Code of Military Justice is functionally the same, except for minor technical points. |
|
antrise
Full Member
Posts: 168
Likes: 3
|
9/11
Sept 22, 2019 7:40:52 GMT
Post by antrise on Sept 22, 2019 7:40:52 GMT
No one really talks about this but it's out there. The US listed the names of the people who hijacked the planes and crashed them. They said they were suicidal and died that day But based on the list of names they gave of the hijackers...theres stuff that doesn't add up. Most (if not all) of the people listed are alive and well living in their countries. They're saying they never hijacked anything and that the US made up lies about this. What is going on? Fetus is not a species. Fetus is not an organism. Fetus is an age. Calling an age group such as fetus, or the elderly parasites is hate speech. Blocking opposition of such hate speech is totalitarianism. pair. two identical, similar, or corresponding things that are matched for use together:
The provision amending the Uniform Code of Military Justice is functionally the same, except for minor technical points. |
|
|
|
9/11
Sept 22, 2019 18:07:10 GMT
Post by Elizabeth on Sept 22, 2019 18:07:10 GMT
Fetus is not a species. Fetus is not an organism. Fetus is an age. Calling an age group such as fetus, or the elderly parasites is hate speech. Blocking opposition of such hate speech is totalitarianism. pair. two identical, similar, or corresponding things that are matched for use together:
The provision amending the Uniform Code of Military Justice is functionally the same, except for minor technical points. Are you calling those people who died in 9/11 a fetus? But they were all people who died. They had their own cultures, families, etc. Those who hurt them spread hate. |
|
Etu Malku
Full Member
Posts: 147 
Likes: 25
Religion: Mercuræn-Luciferian
Philosophy: Western Left Hand Path
|
Post by Etu Malku on Sept 22, 2019 21:27:28 GMT
No one really talks about this but it's out there. The US listed the names of the people who hijacked the planes and crashed them. They said they were suicidal and died that day But based on the list of names they gave of the hijackers...theres stuff that doesn't add up. Most (if not all) of the people listed are alive and well living in their countries. They're saying they never hijacked anything and that the US made up lies about this. What is going on? Soon after the attacks and before the FBI had released the pictures of all the hijackers, several reports claimed some of the men named as hijackers on 9/11 were alive and had their identities stolen. |
|
|
|
9/11
Sept 22, 2019 22:44:19 GMT
Post by Elizabeth on Sept 22, 2019 22:44:19 GMT
No one really talks about this but it's out there. The US listed the names of the people who hijacked the planes and crashed them. They said they were suicidal and died that day But based on the list of names they gave of the hijackers...theres stuff that doesn't add up. Most (if not all) of the people listed are alive and well living in their countries. They're saying they never hijacked anything and that the US made up lies about this. What is going on? Soon after the attacks and before the FBI had released the pictures of all the hijackers, several reports claimed some of the men named as hijackers on 9/11 were alive and had their identities stolen. So who are the real hijackers? Does anyone know? |
|
antrise
Full Member
Posts: 168
Likes: 3
|
9/11
Sept 23, 2019 4:04:01 GMT
Post by antrise on Sept 23, 2019 4:04:01 GMT
Fetus is not a species. Fetus is not an organism. Fetus is an age. Calling an age group such as fetus, or the elderly parasites is hate speech. Blocking opposition of such hate speech is totalitarianism. pair. two identical, similar, or corresponding things that are matched for use together:
The provision amending the Uniform Code of Military Justice is functionally the same, except for minor technical points. Are you calling those people who died in 9/11 a fetus? But they were all people who died. They had their own cultures, families, etc. Those who hurt them spread hate. Those who call fetus parasites hurt them and spread hate. While fetus are in no way a parasite, the towers were in fact a "pair a site", which sounds exactly the same as parasite. The fetus killed by abortion are all people who die. People who since 9/11 have fallen under the protection of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) Sec. 1841. Protection of unborn children (d) As used in this section, the term "unborn child" means a child in utero, and the term "child in utero" or "child, who is in utero" means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb. The provision amending the Uniform Code of Military Justice is functionally the same, except for minor technical points.
|
|
|
|
9/11
Sept 23, 2019 5:32:49 GMT
Post by Elizabeth on Sept 23, 2019 5:32:49 GMT
Are you calling those people who died in 9/11 a fetus? But they were all people who died. They had their own cultures, families, etc. Those who hurt them spread hate. Those who call fetus parasites hurt them and spread hate. While fetus are in no way a parasite, the towers were in fact a "pair a site", which sounds exactly the same as parasite. The fetus killed by abortion are all people who die. People who since 9/11 have fallen under the protection of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) Sec. 1841. Protection of unborn children (d) As used in this section, the term "unborn child" means a child in utero, and the term "child in utero" or "child, who is in utero" means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb. The provision amending the Uniform Code of Military Justice is functionally the same, except for minor technical points.
So you are saying the towers were a parasite and it's good they were destroyed? |
|
antrise
Full Member
Posts: 168
Likes: 3
|
9/11
Sept 23, 2019 18:21:28 GMT
Post by antrise on Sept 23, 2019 18:21:28 GMT
Those who call fetus parasites hurt them and spread hate. While fetus are in no way a parasite, the towers were in fact a "pair a site", which sounds exactly the same as parasite. The fetus killed by abortion are all people who die. People who since 9/11 have fallen under the protection of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) Sec. 1841. Protection of unborn children (d) As used in this section, the term "unborn child" means a child in utero, and the term "child in utero" or "child, who is in utero" means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb. The provision amending the Uniform Code of Military Justice is functionally the same, except for minor technical points.
So you are saying the towers were a parasite and it's good they were destroyed? The towers were a "pair a site" whether I say so or not. Generally speaking it's considered good that actual parasites were destroyed, whether I say so or not, which means calling fetus "parasites" is hate speech that hurts them and spreads hate, no matter what I say. I am saying the enactment of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is good, whatever it was that might have prompted the government to do so.
Are you attempting to defame my character with a derogatory and inflammatory question that implies I am saying it's good the towers were destroyed?
|
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Sept 23, 2019 19:52:10 GMT
So you are saying the towers were a parasite and it's good they were destroyed? The towers were a "pair a site" whether I say so or not. Generally speaking it's considered good that actual parasites were destroyed, whether I say so or not, which means calling fetus "parasites" is hate speech that hurts them and spreads hate, no matter what I say. I am saying the enactment of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is good, whatever it was that might have prompted the government to do so.
Are you attempting to defame my character by implying I am saying it's good the towers were destroyed, with a derogatory and inflammatory question?
I am only attempting to make sure I understand what you are trying to say. That's all!  |
|
antrise
Full Member
Posts: 168
Likes: 3
|
9/11
Sept 23, 2019 20:12:32 GMT
Post by antrise on Sept 23, 2019 20:12:32 GMT
The towers were a "pair a site" whether I say so or not. Generally speaking it's considered good that actual parasites were destroyed, whether I say so or not, which means calling fetus "parasites" is hate speech that hurts them and spreads hate, no matter what I say. I am saying the enactment of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is good, whatever it was that might have prompted the government to do so.
Are you attempting to defame my character with a derogatory and inflammatory question that implies I am saying it's good the towers were destroyed, ?
I am only attempting to make sure I understand what you are trying to say. That's all! Saying "So you are saying" as opposed to saying "So are you saying" suggests otherwise. Either way my personal opinions should be irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Sept 24, 2019 22:39:06 GMT
ElizabethThe only truth in times of war is that lies are the easiest way to disrupt the enemy. False flag attacks are the surest way to ruin your enemies reputation. 9/11 was certainly not an Islamic attack on America, but on the surface, it appears as though it was an attempt to make America got to war against the Saudis. But on a deeper level, even that was likely a deception too.
|
|
antrise
Full Member
Posts: 168
Likes: 3
|
9/11
Sept 25, 2019 23:01:40 GMT
Post by antrise on Sept 25, 2019 23:01:40 GMT
Elizabeth The only truth in times of war is that lies are the easiest way to disrupt the enemy. False flag attacks are the surest way to ruin your enemies reputation. 9/11 was certainly not an Islamic attack on America, but on the surface, it appears as though it was an attempt to make America got to war against the Saudis. But on a deeper level, even that was likely a deception too. Doesn't it seem rather unimaginous not to notice a correlation between the towers being a "pair a site", the widespread slurring of the unborn as "parasites", and the subsequent enactment of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act? It just all seems rather coincidental to me.
|
|
|
|
9/11
Sept 28, 2019 19:14:37 GMT
Post by jonbain on Sept 28, 2019 19:14:37 GMT
Elizabeth The only truth in times of war is that lies are the easiest way to disrupt the enemy. False flag attacks are the surest way to ruin your enemies reputation. 9/11 was certainly not an Islamic attack on America, but on the surface, it appears as though it was an attempt to make America got to war against the Saudis. But on a deeper level, even that was likely a deception too. Doesn't it seem rather unimaginous not to notice a correlation between the towers being a "pair a site", the widespread slurring of the unborn as "parasites", and the subsequent enactment of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act? It just all seems rather coincidental to me.
Sure abortion is symptom of a sick society. But over-population is far worse. And implementing draconian legislation prohibiting sex only serves to make it all the more subconsciously appealing. Some societies practice genital mutilation in a subconscious desperate bid to try and curtail the problem. No quick fixes here. Having tried to examine a solution in psychology and philosophy of ethics for numerous decades, I reach the conclusion that the only real solution is to push for migration to other worlds. Its just a million times easier to travel to the stars than than it is trying to control peoples minds and bodies. In fact, the latter is virtually impossible. The former, is immanent. Or the world goes to hell. Those are the only real options. |
|
|
|
9/11
Sept 28, 2019 19:39:11 GMT
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 28, 2019 19:39:11 GMT
Or observe the overpopulation is a symptom of moving away from natural law progated through the illusion of techological progress, where population extremes as well as discordant thought is a symptom of man's assumed dichotomy with nature that leads to not only an inherent equilibrium (ie population explosion) but an externalization of interior problems due to mans seperation (from this assumed dichotomy) from his interior nature.
9/11 is a symptom of how dominance over nature through an illusion of technological progress is mans simultaneous dominance over himself through a perpetually propogated extremism that masks itself through a variety of forms including false religion.
Going to other planets puts a band aid on the problem if we cannot maintain neither our own external world nor our interior one.
|
|
