Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jul 29, 2019 21:22:14 GMT
Working on clarifying some writing in light of a new forum opening up, called "thinkspot", where users are paid by subscribers. In light of the current chaos in academia, liberal bias, low reward to risk ratio of pursuing a master's, the personal freedom...and a variety of other reasons I am exploring it as an option for pursuing my studies while hopefully gaining an income that will help maintain those studies.
Obviously this material, specifically that of philosophy in general, does not gain a wide following...however it is unavoidable in its practical and abstract existential implications.
In simpler terms it has to be academically deep while open to non-academics.
So this thread will effectively be a continued project. Take it as is.
1. All is assumed, including this argument as a point of origin.
This can be observed empirically through the 5 senses where a phenomenon, such as this written argument, is strictly a point of observation or this argument on a computer screen in my hand as a point of observation as well.
Abstractly, as a memory through the conceptualizing nature of the mind or the intuitive-feeling state of the heart, this argument is a point observation.
Observation, as both empirical and abstract, is assumptive by nature with the nature of empiricism and abstraction being points of origin in and of themselves strictly because all being is "assumed as is".
Questions of being, such as the proper manner of how to be through morality, ethics, cultural etiquette, etc., are grounded as points of origin in and of themselves. All moral systems, premised in secular or religious affiliations, are taken as the point of origin of a people's movements through time and space.
Laws such as the absence of killing, stealing or adultery, as well as the worship of the state or Divinity(ies) are assumed quite strictly for what they are: points of origin of being that if transgressed fundamentally lead to a cessation of being altogether.
Assumption, as a form of origination, thus is the grounding of how man lives and is to live his life considering it is the origin of his awareness itself. To fail to assume is to fail to be considering assumption takes on an element of originality in and of itself.
Assumption takes on a moral nature of origination in and of itself. Laws exist because they are assumed. They originate within the individual and collective psyche because of this nature.
Assumption, as a form or morality in which being originates, thus is a the grounds for being itself. Where one may assume one moral code over another, the constant nature of that moral code is "how to be".
Morality thus takes on a nature of a point of awareness, or a set of axioms, that fundamentally gives being to the individual or society by setting a grounds to how they perceive reality. A simple law, such as "thou shall not kill", forms the nature of the individual/society by setting a grounding set of values. The Assumption Of "Thou Shall Not Kill", In Term Originates As The means ThRough Which The Individual/Society Interacts Or Forms Reality...In Simpler Terms Assumes It.
2. This argument exists through its linear continuity to further assumptions that give definition to it.
This is assumed through point 1 and defined by a linear progression to this point 2.
Empirically this can be observed where one event leads to another: a domino falls causing another domino to fall, or the reproduction of a species where one offspring progresses to another than another.
Abstractly this can be observed with 1 progressing to 2 then 3 etc. Or one word progressing to another word then another word as evidenced by a dictionary.
***Insert Morality
3. All assumptions as points of origin and linear continuums are hence circular.
Point 1 cycles back to point 1 through point 2, considering all is assumed as a point of origin with point 2 as a point of origin because of point 1.
Point 2 cycles back to point 2 through point 1, considering all
Is defined through linearly continuous assumptions and point 1 is a linear regress of point 2.
Point 3 as both a point of origin and linear definition is circular and self maintained.
This can be observed empirically again through: the falling of dominoes where the dominoe is continually cycling the same behavior of falling, or in the act of reproduction where certain characteristics (even the species itself) are repeated.
This can be observed abstractly where 1 is cycled repeatedly through 2, 3, etc., 2 through 4, 6, etc. As well as all of the other numbers.
It can also be observed within words where in a dictionary one word may be directed to another word with the new word being directed back to the original word in the dictionary.
****Insert Morality.
4. Assumption as a point of origin, linear definition and circular maintenance necessitate assumption being grounded in base spatial forms that are not limited to either an empirical or abstract state thus further assuming space as strictly being "purely" assumed.
The point, line and circle as universal assumption cross culturally sets the grounds for consciousness being inseperable except only in terminology that paradoxically follows these same spatial foundations (evidenced above).
Where assumption is grounded in base spatial forms, and the nature of being occurring as assumption, assuming and assumed, space sets the grounds for awareness.
The Monad, circumpunct, bindhu (and a variety of other names) as terms for the point, line and circle will be effectively termed as the Prime Triad or 1 as 3 and 3 as 1.
Assumption and the point, line and circle effectively are one and the same with reality being infinite assumptions of one assumption or infinite variations of this Prime triad.
To be continued...
Obviously this material, specifically that of philosophy in general, does not gain a wide following...however it is unavoidable in its practical and abstract existential implications.
In simpler terms it has to be academically deep while open to non-academics.
So this thread will effectively be a continued project. Take it as is.
1. All is assumed, including this argument as a point of origin.
This can be observed empirically through the 5 senses where a phenomenon, such as this written argument, is strictly a point of observation or this argument on a computer screen in my hand as a point of observation as well.
Abstractly, as a memory through the conceptualizing nature of the mind or the intuitive-feeling state of the heart, this argument is a point observation.
Observation, as both empirical and abstract, is assumptive by nature with the nature of empiricism and abstraction being points of origin in and of themselves strictly because all being is "assumed as is".
Questions of being, such as the proper manner of how to be through morality, ethics, cultural etiquette, etc., are grounded as points of origin in and of themselves. All moral systems, premised in secular or religious affiliations, are taken as the point of origin of a people's movements through time and space.
Laws such as the absence of killing, stealing or adultery, as well as the worship of the state or Divinity(ies) are assumed quite strictly for what they are: points of origin of being that if transgressed fundamentally lead to a cessation of being altogether.
Assumption, as a form of origination, thus is the grounding of how man lives and is to live his life considering it is the origin of his awareness itself. To fail to assume is to fail to be considering assumption takes on an element of originality in and of itself.
Assumption takes on a moral nature of origination in and of itself. Laws exist because they are assumed. They originate within the individual and collective psyche because of this nature.
Assumption, as a form or morality in which being originates, thus is a the grounds for being itself. Where one may assume one moral code over another, the constant nature of that moral code is "how to be".
Morality thus takes on a nature of a point of awareness, or a set of axioms, that fundamentally gives being to the individual or society by setting a grounds to how they perceive reality. A simple law, such as "thou shall not kill", forms the nature of the individual/society by setting a grounding set of values. The Assumption Of "Thou Shall Not Kill", In Term Originates As The means ThRough Which The Individual/Society Interacts Or Forms Reality...In Simpler Terms Assumes It.
2. This argument exists through its linear continuity to further assumptions that give definition to it.
This is assumed through point 1 and defined by a linear progression to this point 2.
Empirically this can be observed where one event leads to another: a domino falls causing another domino to fall, or the reproduction of a species where one offspring progresses to another than another.
Abstractly this can be observed with 1 progressing to 2 then 3 etc. Or one word progressing to another word then another word as evidenced by a dictionary.
***Insert Morality
3. All assumptions as points of origin and linear continuums are hence circular.
Point 1 cycles back to point 1 through point 2, considering all is assumed as a point of origin with point 2 as a point of origin because of point 1.
Point 2 cycles back to point 2 through point 1, considering all
Is defined through linearly continuous assumptions and point 1 is a linear regress of point 2.
Point 3 as both a point of origin and linear definition is circular and self maintained.
This can be observed empirically again through: the falling of dominoes where the dominoe is continually cycling the same behavior of falling, or in the act of reproduction where certain characteristics (even the species itself) are repeated.
This can be observed abstractly where 1 is cycled repeatedly through 2, 3, etc., 2 through 4, 6, etc. As well as all of the other numbers.
It can also be observed within words where in a dictionary one word may be directed to another word with the new word being directed back to the original word in the dictionary.
****Insert Morality.
4. Assumption as a point of origin, linear definition and circular maintenance necessitate assumption being grounded in base spatial forms that are not limited to either an empirical or abstract state thus further assuming space as strictly being "purely" assumed.
The point, line and circle as universal assumption cross culturally sets the grounds for consciousness being inseperable except only in terminology that paradoxically follows these same spatial foundations (evidenced above).
Where assumption is grounded in base spatial forms, and the nature of being occurring as assumption, assuming and assumed, space sets the grounds for awareness.
The Monad, circumpunct, bindhu (and a variety of other names) as terms for the point, line and circle will be effectively termed as the Prime Triad or 1 as 3 and 3 as 1.
Assumption and the point, line and circle effectively are one and the same with reality being infinite assumptions of one assumption or infinite variations of this Prime triad.
To be continued...