Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2018 20:58:03 GMT
Incoherence of the Philosophers
So far i rested on the perspective for the rational universe there must be an uncaused being (God) but he does not deal in particulars.
The part about not dealing in particulars was hard to swallow since had strong conviction that he interacts through omens and having it experienced multiple times too.
SINCE WHEN WAS IGNORANCE ABOUT ANYTHING EXCELLENT?? and we expect the creator to be unaware?? They say God is with in you. U scratch off even a bit of your skin and in no time the platelets will clot the blood. The body is aware.
The reality we call God lay outside the realm of sense perception and logical thought so science and metaphysics is futile. We have to develop the highest form of knowledge the intuitive knowledge a power higher than reason. People who fail to develop cannot deny such knowledge exist, that would be same as a deaf person denying a melody.
Have to cultivate special mode of seeing. Mystics are able to rise above the world of metaphor which has to satisfy the less gifted mortals.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Relationship with GOD ?
Religions have done a fair job in misdirecting to fool the masses that relationship along the lines of care and worship exits , God is omnipotent why would he even be in need of your praise or worship .
First we got to establish whether a relationship exist , if it does what does it constitute . Experiencing things in harmony, lot of things interdependence with each other . e.g Sun powers all life on earth . i do tend to establish a relationship does exist. What it constitute of is drawn from the former statement Harmony . To be aligned with universe, which is achieved through LOVE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cosmos was rational and in a rational universe there must be an Uncaused Being, an Unmoved Mover at the apex of the hierarchy of existence. Something must have started the chain of cause and effect. The absence of such a supreme being would mean that our minds were not in sympathy with reality as a whole. That, in turn, would mean that the universe was not coherent and rational. This utterly simple being upon which the whole of multiple, contingent reality depended was what the religions called 'God'. Because it is the highest thing of all, it must be absolutely perfect
The multiplicity we see all around us must be dependent upon a primal unity.
Since our minds do regard composite things as secondary and derivative, this tendency must have been caused by something outside them that is a simple, higher reality. Multiple things are contingent and contingent beings are inferior to the realities upon which they depend, rather as in a family children are inferior in status to the father who gave them being. Something that is Simplicity itself will be what the philosophers call a 'Necessary Being', that is, it will not depend on anything else for its existence.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jun 17, 2018 21:20:14 GMT
@unknown There are many mediums-charlatans on the Internet who try to connect a person with God!For Example Theosophy.
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Jun 17, 2018 21:31:02 GMT
There are many mediums-charlatans on the Internet who try to connect a person with God!For Example Theosophy. The charlatan that he is referring to here is Al-Ghazali, one of the people I hate most in all of history. Al-Ghazali promoted the curse of Sufism within mainstream Islam. Sufism is mystical garbage.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jun 17, 2018 21:34:35 GMT
There are many mediums-charlatans on the Internet who try to connect a person with God!For Example Theosophy. The charlatan that he is referring to here is Al-Ghazali, one of the people I hate most in all of history. Al-Ghazali promoted the curse of Sufism within mainstream Islam. Sufism is mystical garbage. If I am not mistaken, Sufism has roots in Jewish Kabbalah?
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Jun 17, 2018 21:55:09 GMT
If I am not mistaken, Sufism has roots in Jewish Kabbalah? I don't think so. They are similar but with different origins. I think they developed at about the same time, Sufism slightly earlier. They are equally horrible.
|
|