Dugin's The Fourth Political Theory

Enlightnization was widespread among not many, many literature, politic, scientific, and etc followers, so this idea was shared and pushing toward not only in the West. But, the idea of spreading their views was not based on enlightening principles, but rather on conquest tactics. It was shred, and it's still shared tactics of many countries.

To Dugin's individualism/enlight: 
No, you're not right about Dugin's 'bad' thinking of individualism and enlightment's ideas. He's rather postmodernist, than monarchist, traditionalist, or something.
Individualism is just a way of thinking which has been made by the folks on their territory, but it was a found of their own 'logos', which is the way of their life, their sense. Anyway, it was something that they got during their history, understanding themselves.

So, his idea of individualism is that it ties up with liberal ideas which are laid under UK politics. However, in US he sees pragmatic ideals are laid under the roots of their philosophy. Liberal ideas, or pragmatism - it depends on the territory they live, not on 'spread everywhere' tactics. As we admire that there's no 'idealistic', naive decision about enlightening of all people, but we're dealing with just plain conquest tactics, and we can see that collectivism, or individualism is in the way of some folks. 

It doesn't mean that individualism, or enlightment are bad, but their ideas are dead, and using of these ideas is the way of exhausting your own potential. For example, pragmatic ideas are erasing now, and overwriting with liberal ideas in US which is a sing of real changes, i.e. 'an appearing of the contradiction'. The last ones were destructing many countries in past. So, the question of what strategy we should use depends not on the question of its own idea, but in idea of - what is going no in real? - to be sure what tactics we should use before spreading a certain idea.