Discussion about Hinduism!

On hinduism, actually, today's hindus are brutally racially mixed. What happened was the even before the advent of aryans, an important moment in the culture and ethos of hindus, there were other races residing.

One thing is there, the actual hinduism is dravidian brahmanism. Dravid, I think were not south indians, but the people residing in the east gangetic plains. There were lot of wars against aryans and the dravidian brahmanism.

when, certain rigvedic central asian aryans migrated towards the east gangetic plains, and tried to become the lords, their political expansionsin was finally nailed by the dravidian brahmanism, along with the indian people.

And in the end, the surviving aryans have instead become guardians of the dravidian brahmanism.

However, these dravidian brahmanical people did one trick. In order to pose as aryans, they threw their original dravidian lords, and instead painted the indo-european lords as the dravida lords, and gave them the names of brahma, vishnu, mahesha.

"A few Vedic tribes from Saptha Sindhva broke RigVedic norms and migrated southward. These numerically outnumbered groups expanding into the trans-gangetic region near the end of the Vedic period (8-6th century BC) tried to use the indigenous Dravidian priesthood to entrench themselves as the new ruling order. Within a few generations of acquiring control over the foreign Gangasthan, the minority Vedic tribes were usurped by the indigenous 'borrowed' priesthood; their Aryan religion, gods and customs mostly deposed and supplanted with indigenous gangetic gods and mythologies; and their new social order (varna or color based) replaced with the pre-existing profession (jati) based Brahmanical caste system ('chatur-varna' ). Through religious manipulation and intrigue, the Vedic in-comers to Gangasthan were usurped and made to surrender their political rule and soon pigeon-holed into becoming the loyal obedient chownkidars of their 'superior' dravidic Brahmanas."

How many were Dravidian and how did they exert influence?
You have origin of them!?

Actually, there is no origin of brahmans. This brahman word came during gupta empire. But, there were clearly tussles with the people of east gangetic plains and the north west aryans. These priestly people used to call aryans as impure and uncleas, because, they used to bury their dead, used to eat meat and were drinkers.

Also, these mountain people were mostly bards and fortune tellers. Using this, they also penned down mythological stories, and then, used the people to fight war with the aryans, and slowly and steadily, they spread these mythological fabrication across all the indians.

In fact, the sanskrit was penned down using a brahmi script. There is huge influence of dravidian language on sanskrit

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dravidian_languages#Northern_Dravidian_pockets

Vedic Sanskrit has retroflex consonants (ṭ/ḍ, ṇ) with about 88 words in the Rigveda having unconditioned retroflexes.[80][81] Some sample words are Iṭanta, Kaṇva, śakaṭī, kevaṭa, puṇya and maṇḍūka. Since other Indo-European languages, including other Indo-Iranian languages, lack retroflex consonants, their presence in Indo-Aryan is often cited as evidence of substrate influence from close contact of the Vedic speakers with speakers of a foreign language family rich in retroflex consonants.[80][81] The Dravidian family is a serious candidate since it is rich in retroflex phonemes reconstructible back to the Proto-Dravidian stage.[82][83][84]
In addition, a number of grammatical features of Vedic Sanskrit not found in its sister Avestan language appear to have been borrowed from Dravidian languages. These include the gerund, which has the same function as in Dravidian, and the quotative marker iti.[85] Some linguists explain this asymmetrical borrowing by arguing that Middle Indo-Aryan languages were built on a Dravidian substratum.[86] These scholars argue that the most plausible explanation for the presence of Dravidian structural features in Indic is language shift, that is, native Dravidian speakers learning and adopting Indic languages.[87] Although each of the innovative traits in Indic could be accounted for by internal explanations, early Dravidian influence is the only explanation that can account for all of the innovations at once; moreover, it accounts for several of the innovative traits in Indic better than any internal explanation that has been proposed.[88]

hinduism is mainly filled with mythologies and fairy tales of certain historical events. And majority of these historical events happen to be the war history of aryans!!!!!

And using these mytholgoies, the brahmans actually conquered entire indian subcontinent.

No, let world know the facts about hinduism or dravidian brahmanical culture, and why is that, even today, non brahmanical hindus have hatred on brahmins, why do they shun hinduism if given a chance, and prefer to choose and become martial races with any other invading races be it mongolian or indo-european britishers.

In fact, this hinduism and caste system is a real curse for India and Indians. Because, this has made indians completely immoral, unethical, and slackers.