|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jan 25, 2018 23:32:40 GMT
What culture are your close or interesting? What kind of culture do you not like? Why?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2018 9:48:43 GMT
//the intention of genetics is never aimed towards culture, its aimed toward survival in the immediate surroundings. culture seems to be is a conscious byproduct of these genetic differences which occur on the basis of what the animals needs to do to survive. it doesnt really matter what haplogroup you come from or what race or ancestory yu descend from, we can base our ideas on differences within the ideas themselves which are produced by us (culture) or we can look at the fact that we all produce ideas to interpret life regardless of the sub specie variants and in that context we are all one, although how hierarchies are constructed based on culture as well as phenotypes is a rather interesting topic//
sorry but my ancestors WERE WAR LORDS, AND I WANT MY NEXT GENERATION TO LOOK LIKE THEM.
Good thing about me is that my MOTHER AND FATHER ARE COUSINS, thanks to my grandfather, who himself had lot of knowledge on this.
And he used to say that now that indians are going to rule, THIS IS GOING TO BE FILLED WITH MONGRELS. How right he was.
So i am not going to be part of these ideas, agendas, nationalism, no ways. I am never ever going to work for those who are ZIONISTS.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2018 9:49:58 GMT
And yes, difference in skull shapes, eyes, reflect lot of character. Why is that INDIANS ARE CONSIDERED THIEFS?
|
|
marduk
Junior Member
Posts: 83
Likes: 43
Country: India
Location: Pune
Politics: is sophistry so no
Religion: all of them :D
Hero: Carl Jung and Marduk
|
Post by marduk on Feb 27, 2018 10:26:50 GMT
And yes, difference in skull shapes, eyes, reflect lot of character. Why is that INDIANS ARE CONSIDERED THIEFS? well 1st you have to define indians so that we come to agreement with the terminology well you have to look at character as a evolutionary mechanism which allows survival here is another example there is particular fish i forgot its name but the beta males of the specie tend to hide their male reproductive organs in order to blend in with the females and once they have blended with the females they mate under the protection of the alpha male without his knowldge that the females are being mated with. now we can say that the fish showcases slyness when it comes to character but that simply gives it more chances to survive.same thing is applicable to humans but with more complex implications based on the complexity of our social systems. even the most looked down upon traits aided the survival of the specie in one way or the other i feel the need to rephrase my question so what are the implications of all these various characteristics or strategies of survival help a population as a whole and within that population based on how much they help within a certain time period and how does that translate into social status or hierarchies was my question how does this apply to you? you seem to be more attached to a certain idea of hierarchy based on social status and phenotypes and there are references of time which i believe is a result of culture , which should put you in a position of potential meta awareness which might lead to, "as to why" rather than "just because"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2018 10:49:55 GMT
And yes, difference in skull shapes, eyes, reflect lot of character. Why is that INDIANS ARE CONSIDERED THIEFS? well 1st you have to define indians so that we come to agreement with the terminology well you have to look at character as a evolutionary mechanism which allows survival here is another example there is particular fish i forgot its name but the beta males of the specie tend to hide their male reproductive organs in order to blend in with the females and once they have blended with the females they mate under the protection of the alpha male without his knowldge that the females are being mated with. now we can say that the fish showcases slyness when it comes to character but that simply gives it more chances to survive.same thing is applicable to humans but with more complex implications based on the complexity of our social systems. even the most looked down upon traits aided the survival of the specie in one way or the other i feel the need to rephrase my question so what are the implications of all these various characteristics or strategies of survival help a population as a whole and within that population based on how much they help within a certain time period and how does that translate into social status or hierarchies was my question how does this apply to you? you seem to be more attached to a certain idea of hierarchy based on social status and phenotypes and there are references of time which i believe is a result of culture , which should put you in a position of potential meta awareness which might lead to, "as to why" rather than "just because" My ancestors were land lords, and they used to be inbreeds, and this is how, the lands used to get passed on. Even my father and mothers are cousins, though by that time, we lost the rule. Technically I must be the ruler of india.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2018 11:24:11 GMT
Besides, why shall my kids suffer,work under the sun light, when the rich indians send their kids abroad to study in MIT,CALTECH,HARVARD, STANFORD, to time pass there and busy promoting HINDUTVA CULTURE?
When I am not even related to those narayan murthy, nandan nilekani and I am not their BONDED LABOR, if anything ,THOSE PEOPLE ARE MY SLAVES.
|
|
marduk
Junior Member
Posts: 83
Likes: 43
Country: India
Location: Pune
Politics: is sophistry so no
Religion: all of them :D
Hero: Carl Jung and Marduk
|
Post by marduk on Feb 27, 2018 12:57:56 GMT
Besides, why shall my kids suffer,work under the sun light, when the rich indians send their kids abroad to study in MIT,CALTECH,HARVARD, STANFORD, to time pass there and busy promoting HINDUTVA CULTURE? When I am not even related to those narayan murthy, nandan nilekani and I am not their BONDED LABOR, if anything ,THOSE PEOPLE ARE MY SLAVES. 1.ok you have to define suffering because suffering is prevalent within all contexts of experience, the only thing which changes is the nature of the suffering and your attitude towards it, so no matter what you do your kids are going to suffer one way or the other unless they have been taught to perceive life in as many ways as possible which makes the suffering easier to digest 2. time pass seems to be a vague assertion and along with the promotion of hindutva culture, i am in a position where i can potentially enroll myslef in any institution abroad and my parents have already begun the fusion of indian culture into western culture long before me, they believe in mutual assimilation 3.looking at the world from a rich/poor, slave /owner or any set of binariess for that matter is a huge problem, why? because the nuance is absolutely removed people can either be right or wrong there is no in between, and tyranny takes shape due to the deliberate removal of nuance, while ignorance is the lack of knowldge when it comes to nuance.these are the lessons we learned from marxism and the spread of communism. ideas which dictate right or wrong based on binary parameters always go wrong, because the world simply isnt black and white its both as well as grey at the same time. 4. if you are coming from the perspective of tradition and ancient wisdom, i get your point, there is some truth to it, but the fact remains that certain truths are truths within a context, and that context is time, without the context they can be falsified, so we cannot blindly follow ancient wisdom we need to deconstruct it and update it according to the context that is todays day and age because we simply have more information today lets take inbreeding as an example for point 4 when it comes to distribution of land, in the times of our grandparents i can see why it was viable, i can see why the behaviour accpeted by society , it simply increases the chances of the survival of your children because you have a garunteed place to develop resources for your survival. but now if you try to apply that which was considered to be valid and true at once that is inbreeding today, we know its invalid because of the limited genetic pool which results in genetic regression the more you inbreed, here we are not dependant on land for a garunteed source of income, we can find other ways, which makes inbreeding invalid from a resource distribituion point of view, because that part has been taken care of , genetic regression on the other is a reality for todays day and age simply because we have new information and ancient wisdom needs to be updated accordingly
|
|
marduk
Junior Member
Posts: 83
Likes: 43
Country: India
Location: Pune
Politics: is sophistry so no
Religion: all of them :D
Hero: Carl Jung and Marduk
|
Post by marduk on Feb 27, 2018 13:00:33 GMT
Besides, why shall my kids suffer,work under the sun light, when the rich indians send their kids abroad to study in MIT,CALTECH,HARVARD, STANFORD, to time pass there and busy promoting HINDUTVA CULTURE? When I am not even related to those narayan murthy, nandan nilekani and I am not their BONDED LABOR, if anything ,THOSE PEOPLE ARE MY SLAVES. 1.ok you have to define suffering because suffering is prevalent within all contexts of experience, the only thing which changes is the nature of the suffering and your attitude towards it, so no matter what you do your kids are going to suffer one way or the other unless they have been taught to perceive life in as many ways as possible which makes the suffering easier to digest 2. time pass seems to be a vague assertion and along with the promotion of hindutva culture, i am in a position where i can potentially enroll myslef in any institution abroad and my parents have already begun the fusion of indian culture into western culture long before me, they believe in mutual assimilation 3.looking at the world from a rich/poor, slave /owner or any set of binariess for that matter is a huge problem, why? because the nuance is absolutely removed people can either be right or wrong there is no in between, and tyranny takes shape due to the deliberate removal of nuance, while ignorance is the lack of knowldge when it comes to nuance.these are the lessons we learned from marxism and the spread of communism. ideas which dictate right or wrong based on binary parameters always go wrong, because the world simply isnt black and white its both as well as grey at the same time. 4. if you are coming from the perspective of tradition and ancient wisdom, i get your point, there is some truth to it, but the fact remains that certain truths are truths within a context, and that context is time, without the context they can be falsified, so we cannot blindly follow ancient wisdom we need to deconstruct it and update it according to the context that is todays day and age because we simply have more information today lets take inbreeding as an example for point 4 when it comes to distribution of land, in the times of our grandparents i can see why it was viable, i can see why the behaviour accpeted by society , it simply increases the chances of the survival of your children because you have a garunteed place to develop resources for your survival. but now if you try to apply that which was considered to be valid and true at once that is inbreeding today, we know its invalid because of the limited genetic pool which results in genetic regression the more you inbreed, here we are not dependant on land for a garunteed source of income, we can find other ways, which makes inbreeding invalid from a resource distribituion point of view, because that part has been taken care of , genetic regression on the other is a reality for todays day and age simply because we have new information and ancient wisdom needs to be updated accordingly so can you say the logic i presented above can be applied to abstract belief structures beyond just survival?
|
|
skallad
New Member
Posts: 10
Likes: 10
Meta-Ethnicity: European
Ethnicity: Scandinavian, Macedonian
Country: Sweden
Politics: Socialist
Religion: Atheism
Relationship Status: Taken
Age: 19
|
Post by skallad on Mar 8, 2018 23:30:56 GMT
I've grown up with a mixture of culture. My paternal grandfather's side of the family is Macedonian so I've grown up with a lot of Macedonian food as well as Swedish and Danish food. When it comes to tradition, my Swedish family is Jehovah's witnesses so they don't celebrate shit. I am not one who cares about Christmas or Easter. Just doesn't interest me. There are 364 other days of the year on which you can give and receive gifts, why not let it be a surprise and when the person might need it? This disconnect from holidays is because I've grown up with religious parents and relatives.
Personally, I would never follow a religion. I am content with not knowing some things and I dontcare to know. Either way, as I have a Kurdish best friend and an Afghan boyfriend, I am affected by them and invited to different occasions.
|
|
KHNUM77
Junior Member
Posts: 51
Likes: 43
Country: USA
Age: Reincarnated
|
Post by KHNUM77 on May 15, 2018 5:18:20 GMT
I've always had an affinity for South East Asian, Indonesian, Indian, and Persian cultures. I guess it stems from a young age as i had been exposed to various art forms and literature from these cultures more specifically than others.
I cant say that i extremely dislike any particular culture. It seems that as i become more immersed in any research of a culture that i had not previously been interested in there usually becomes at least some strong points as i look into them further. I can say that I come from a primarily Italian and German background and have been exposed to a strong Belgian influence as well. I'm very curious at the moment about Egyptian and West Asian Cultures as i'm currently studying a book on world mythology that covers these.
Also, i just viewed an interesting movie called Mystics In Bali which proved to be a very interesting piece of film work which focus is on the Leyak / Leak (le-ak). It is definitely worth a view if your into Balinese culture.
|
|