|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 10, 2023 20:19:06 GMT
The fact that mathematical axioms are 'self' evidential necessitates a self within the formation of mathematics and as such further necessitates a subjectivity. This subjective nature to math paradoxically results in certain axioms not being accepted as the subjective is relative thus necessitating true/false values for everything depending upon the angle of observation. I don't accept the axioms of math and the 'self'-evidential nature of these axioms is further proof I don't have to.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 19, 2023 22:05:28 GMT
"3. As an interpretation, mathematics is relative" Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.....I meant, Ohhhh, okay! Once again, mathematic axioms, you know, the ones that are acknowledged and excepted by almost every freaking mathematician in current times, does not care what you think. Your seeming lackadaisical attitude about math is hilarious. You just invent and use logical and philosophical terms in very nonconstructive and incomprehensible ways, in what seems to be your way of attempting to show how "smart" you think you are. It never seems to advance the subject at hand, only to stifle the conversation. So, in turn most of the other people that wanted to have a reciprocating conversation just give up and move on, not all but most. Don't think so? Take a look at all of the people that no longer participate, and you are the one that they interacted with the most in their short time here. That is why I left for a period of time, because you are exasperating and tiring, and there are many other chat rooms and forums where I don't have to listen your foolishness. Just a question, Do you EVER except that you may be wrong? Or do you believe that you're just the smartest cookie in the room at all times? From this point forward, I am not going to respond or participate in any of your post (yeah, I know you are heartbroken about it) unless it appears that you are genuinely trying to have a real conversation. Of course they are to be accepted by mathematicians, who promotes what he does not accept...what the pope is not going to advance Catholicism? That is hypocritical of you if you are as much of a 'skeptical' humanist as you claim to be. Why not be skeptical of math or the status quo for that matter as well? Why stop at certain 'truths' if you are a true skeptic? As to "not going to respond or participate in any of your posts"...you just did. If you have subjects to post then post threads about them, no one is stopping you from advancing your own thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 19, 2023 22:06:30 GMT
Mathematics does not care if you don't accept the axioms of maths. Look around you, everything you see that is man-made are a result of what you are calling failed mathematic axioms. Mathematics are always evolving, just like science. And it is true that sometimes great strides are made when an axiom of math is changed due to advancing knowledge. Axioms are not written in stone.
Ah, but the most axiomatic principle of all is that whomsoever can pull Excalibur from its stone;
that man, is King.
And every man pulls an Excalibur from the stone when he overcomes some inherent difficulty.
|
|