|
Post by jonbain on Feb 19, 2023 15:45:30 GMT
This could mean a psychological state of knowing, but more vitally to this society is what the alleged academic institutions, take to be this foundation.
And if this cannot be agreed upon, then chaos and war degenerate the process further.
Be it a moral or logical answer, or both entwined...
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Mar 11, 2023 8:37:29 GMT
The universe only contributes to our thoughts. Nowhere on close inspection empirically are there contradictions in the physical universe. Thoughts alone can have contradictions and errors. But when one false thought passes from one person to another, via the universe, the error is still contained only in the thoughts themselves.
Its entirely achievable to halt the false thought, by being sensitive to its dissonance, and examining the situation further until the truth is revealed.
Only by properly comprehending the Newtonian model will you see that real math has no contradictions. Until then all you see is a knot of confusions.
Computer programming languages FORCE you mind to obey proper logic. They are the most patient and the most unforgiving teachers.
1. Yet thoughts are physical as evidenced by there activity within the brain or even, at a stretch, the heart. 2. The observation of movement is an observation of contradiction as one thing becomes distinct from another, this manifestation of distinction is a manifestation of contradiction.
1. Are TV programs located inside the TV set because there is activity within the TV set when the TV program is being viewed?
We pull apart the TV set, there are no little people inside it. We pull apart the brain, we find no thoughts we can extract and put inside someone else's brain.
Almost all 'brain science' (apart from basic tumor removal) has zero empirical experiment to prove it as genuine; and if you examine brain models over the decades and centuries, there is no consistency to any of the various theories.
People, especially academic 'scientists' are more stupid than ever before, as is evidenced by their 'black-hole' Nobel prize farce.
2. A contradiction is not a contrast, nor is it a juxtaposition, nor is it a dichotomy.
A contradiction is a claim to two logically mutually exclusive phenomena.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Mar 11, 2023 18:33:58 GMT
Knowledge is based on curiosity. Autistic children do not learn because they lack the curiosity to explore the world.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Mar 13, 2023 14:29:26 GMT
Knowledge is based on curiosity. Autistic children do not learn because they lack the curiosity to explore the world.
Curiosity is an act of faith in the unknown.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 22, 2023 20:55:50 GMT
1. Yet thoughts are physical as evidenced by there activity within the brain or even, at a stretch, the heart. 2. The observation of movement is an observation of contradiction as one thing becomes distinct from another, this manifestation of distinction is a manifestation of contradiction.
1. Are TV programs located inside the TV set because there is activity within the TV set when the TV program is being viewed?
We pull apart the TV set, there are no little people inside it. We pull apart the brain, we find no thoughts we can extract and put inside someone else's brain.
Almost all 'brain science' (apart from basic tumor removal) has zero empirical experiment to prove it as genuine; and if you examine brain models over the decades and centuries, there is no consistency to any of the various theories.
People, especially academic 'scientists' are more stupid than ever before, as is evidenced by their 'black-hole' Nobel prize farce.
2. A contradiction is not a contrast, nor is it a juxtaposition, nor is it a dichotomy.
A contradiction is a claim to two logically mutually exclusive phenomena.
1. Can tv programs occur without the tv set? Can thoughts occur without a brain? 2. Contradiction necessitates a 'standing apart' and as such relates to contrasts/juxtapositions/dichtomies.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Mar 22, 2023 21:24:39 GMT
1. Are TV programs located inside the TV set because there is activity within the TV set when the TV program is being viewed?
We pull apart the TV set, there are no little people inside it. We pull apart the brain, we find no thoughts we can extract and put inside someone else's brain.
Almost all 'brain science' (apart from basic tumor removal) has zero empirical experiment to prove it as genuine; and if you examine brain models over the decades and centuries, there is no consistency to any of the various theories.
People, especially academic 'scientists' are more stupid than ever before, as is evidenced by their 'black-hole' Nobel prize farce.
2. A contradiction is not a contrast, nor is it a juxtaposition, nor is it a dichotomy.
A contradiction is a claim to two logically mutually exclusive phenomena.
1. Can tv programs occur without the tv set? Can thoughts occur without a brain? 2. Contradiction necessitates a 'standing apart' and as such relates to contrasts/juxtapositions/dichtomies.
The script of Fawlty Towers existed before it was filmed. Before that signal arrives at the TV set, its still exists, albeit encoded.
The key to the word 'contradiction' is that involves concepts that are necessarily mutually exclusive. The others do not.
English has more than enough useless synonyms. Its a very weak language philosophically as it riddles itself in ambiguity within those synonyms. Especially as words can have different connotations in various parts of the world.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 22, 2023 21:29:16 GMT
1. Can tv programs occur without the tv set? Can thoughts occur without a brain? 2. Contradiction necessitates a 'standing apart' and as such relates to contrasts/juxtapositions/dichtomies.
The script of Fawlty Towers existed before it was filmed. Before that signal arrives at the TV set, its still exists, albeit encoded.
The key to the word 'contradiction' is that involves concepts that are necessarily mutually exclusive. The others do not.
English has more than enough useless synonyms. Its a very weak language philosophically as it riddles itself in ambiguity within those synonyms. Especially as words can have different connotations in various parts of the world.
But the script is a tv program because of the tv just as an image is a thought because of the brain.
"Standing apart" is mutual exclusiveness and this mutual exclusiveness allows for form to occur. Because things can stand apart we have the forms necessary for the foundations of reason and imagination.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Mar 23, 2023 7:56:22 GMT
xxxxxxxxxLorsque la première idée de faire une émission de télévision et de télévision est venue à la lumière dans l'esprit de cet écossais, la télévision à cette époque n'existait pas.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 24, 2023 17:50:52 GMT
xxxxxxxxx Lorsque la première idée de faire une émission de télévision et de télévision est venue à la lumière dans l'esprit de cet écossais, la télévision à cette époque n'existait pas. The tv show can only exist in our time and space because of the tv, the same thing occurs from the brain. Take for example my neighbor with brain cancer. Before surgery she could do math. After surgery she could not.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Mar 24, 2023 18:50:13 GMT
xxxxxxxxx Lorsque la première idée de faire une émission de télévision et de télévision est venue à la lumière dans l'esprit de cet écossais, la télévision à cette époque n'existait pas. The tv show can only exist in our time and space because of the tv, the same thing occurs from the brain. Take for example my neighbor with brain cancer. Before surgery she could do math. After surgery she could not.
In the 70's before TV came to Africa, we used to watch reel-to-reel home movies. No TV required.
You claim that you think with your 'brain' because that is what you have heard on your tv all your life. Rupert Sheldrake proves that the brain only cools the blood. (The Science Delusion).
Consciousness connects to the body via the SPINE.
And 'cancer' is just a way of saying: "we don't know what we are doing but give us loads of money to pretend we can make you better when we cannot".
Without logic you fall prey to the quacks.
When I got my leg kicked in half playing soccer, as I sat writhing on the ground in agony, I was incapable of math.
Thus you have proven that math is performed in the Fibula.
Cancer, btw, is almost certainly just an imbalance in PH. Stop eating preservatives and carbs. Especially refined sugar.
And it just goes away.
Unless you are so racked with guilt and naivete that you just keep sucking up the sugars - and the BOOZE.
But that cure loses the corpies money, so you will not get a doctor openly admitting it, even though their formal research actually proves what I say.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 31, 2023 17:25:37 GMT
The tv show can only exist in our time and space because of the tv, the same thing occurs from the brain. Take for example my neighbor with brain cancer. Before surgery she could do math. After surgery she could not.
In the 70's before TV came to Africa, we used to watch reel-to-reel home movies. No TV required.
You claim that you think with your 'brain' because that is what you have heard on your tv all your life. Rupert Sheldrake proves that the brain only cools the blood. (The Science Delusion).
Consciousness connects to the body via the SPINE.
And 'cancer' is just a way of saying: "we don't know what we are doing but give us loads of money to pretend we can make you better when we cannot".
Without logic you fall prey to the quacks.
When I got my leg kicked in half playing soccer, as I sat writhing on the ground in agony, I was incapable of math.
Thus you have proven that math is performed in the Fibula.
Cancer, btw, is almost certainly just an imbalance in PH. Stop eating preservatives and carbs. Especially refined sugar.
And it just goes away.
Unless you are so racked with guilt and naivete that you just keep sucking up the sugars - and the BOOZE.
But that cure loses the corpies money, so you will not get a doctor openly admitting it, even though their formal research actually proves what I say.
1. A reel to reel home movie is not a tv show though, it is a reel to reel home movie and this would not exist without a projector. A tv show cannot exist without a tv. 2. No, I witnessed this empirically. My neighbor owns a business and used math to run it. My neighbor then got brain cancer and surgery following it. Now she cannot do math and can barely speak even after months of healing. 3. The ability to think to reduced by pain as the attention one applies to a calculation is diverted; your argument is faulty. 4. Research by who? The institutions you condemn? Or by someone who resonates your biases?
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Apr 1, 2023 8:24:50 GMT
Countless online resources that can most simply be found by going to a search engine, typing in your symptoms, followed by the word 'diet'.
Not every resource is equally useful, obviously, and the only way to prove the various diets is with trial and error. But I have not been near a doctor in nigh 30 years.
There are also ways to eliminate the counter-information. Every product that is guilty has its own marketing campaign labelled under phrases like 'scientifically proved', when it poisons for profit.
If it has a long list of ingredients, its most certainly just cancer in a box. Just eat fresh food, is the simplest answer. But even that will kill you if its a milk and fruit diet. (Mussolini was almost dead of this when he hung).
Institutionalism is its own problem.
This is where developmental psychology is quite useful. Money-grubbing liars have a certain style, which can best be described as retentive.
But then we all know that nothing escapes the black-hole even if it moves at light-speed. And this proves that gravity emitted from that black-hole moves at light-speed...
$1m Nobel prize for this, and still no repentance after more than 5 years...
world war is a consequence of weakness of logic. Clean up those institutions, or watch them burn the world with their ignorance.
They are the cancer.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 7, 2023 17:11:40 GMT
Countless online resources that can most simply be found by going to a search engine, typing in your symptoms, followed by the word 'diet'. Not every resource is equally useful, obviously, and the only way to prove the various diets is with trial and error. But I have not been near a doctor in nigh 30 years. There are also ways to eliminate the counter-information. Every product that is guilty has its own marketing campaign labelled under phrases like 'scientifically proved', when it poisons for profit. If it has a long list of ingredients, its most certainly just cancer in a box. Just eat fresh food, is the simplest answer. But even that will kill you if its a milk and fruit diet. (Mussolini was almost dead of this when he hung). Institutionalism is its own problem. This is where developmental psychology is quite useful. Money-grubbing liars have a certain style, which can best be described as retentive. But then we all know that nothing escapes the black-hole even if it moves at light-speed. And this proves that gravity emitted from that black-hole moves at light-speed... $1m Nobel prize for this, and still no repentance after more than 5 years... world war is a consequence of weakness of logic. Clean up those institutions, or watch them burn the world with their ignorance. They are the cancer. 1. And these search engines are part of the prevailing institutions. 1a. The search engines which are not part of the prevailing institutions cater to information which is counter to said institutions. 1b. Either way the information is bias and if we are to take a look at the whole picture then we are left with contradiction and a multitude of biases. 2. War is justified by logic. An absence of war is also justified by logic. Logic can justify anything thus it means nothing.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Apr 11, 2023 10:27:54 GMT
The meaning of logic is that we can use it to predict future events.
We can discern websites of bad value due to their lack of internal logical consistency. Its the same for any set of claims.
But then we all know that nothing escapes the black-hole even if it moves at light-speed. And this proves that gravity emitted from that black-hole moves at light-speed...
So go trust those people if you like.
or trust in Truth from logic
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 12, 2023 15:05:15 GMT
The meaning of logic is that we can use it to predict future events. We can discern websites of bad value due to their lack of internal logical consistency. Its the same for any set of claims. But then we all know that nothing escapes the black-hole even if it moves at light-speed. And this proves that gravity emitted from that black-hole moves at light-speed... So go trust those people if you like. or trust in Truth from logic The fact that we cannot predict everything necessitates logic as not universal. It can be argued however, from the other perspective, that we are not using logic to its fullest extent as we are not entirely logical beings, hence the absence of predicting everything, however this is a fallacy as well considering logic is grounded in illogical beings...it is dependent upon its opposite state. Dually we cannot predict when logic will not be used thus logic cannot predict its own limits, it cannot predict itself.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 12, 2023 17:43:42 GMT
The meaning of logic is that we can use it to predict future events. We can discern websites of bad value due to their lack of internal logical consistency. Its the same for any set of claims. But then we all know that nothing escapes the black-hole even if it moves at light-speed. And this proves that gravity emitted from that black-hole moves at light-speed... So go trust those people if you like. or trust in Truth from logic The fact that we cannot predict everything necessitates logic as not universal. It can be argued however, from the other perspective, that we are not using logic to its fullest extent as we are not entirely logical beings, hence the absence of predicting everything, however this is a fallacy as well considering logic is grounded in illogical beings...it is dependent upon its opposite state. Dually we cannot predict when logic will not be used thus logic cannot predict its own limits, it cannot predict itself. Logic is a form. We believe this form is universal exactly because it allows us to predict things. We think that it allows us to predict, because it follows the thinking strategy of anyone → if logic doesn't work, nothing works either. Seems this is the end, but this is not. It means our brains work in this way. If we were half-persons/half-androids with extra memory and extra abilities we might count on our thinking abilities in other way, let's say we were not needed in simplicity. We couldn't predict if we couldn't think. To think is to arrange things within a mind, not in reality. And if such an arrangement is successful, then our thinking was correct. Was it logical? It depends on whether the laws of logic were applied. My personal thought is that it is unnecessary. There might be other ways.
|
|