|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jan 11, 2022 10:39:43 GMT
Philosophers don't only use those useless words as reality, the truth, really real, the absoluteness, the unlimately, the forms, the ideas, the concepts, sense, the primal cause, the perpetual mobile, to exist, the meaning, etc, they also care about those words and like to sweep those devalued words in a delicately tender way. They like their routine.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jan 27, 2022 21:22:30 GMT
The symbols point to itself (the set), it means itself. No "§∆_" means "§∆_"; §∆_=§∆_
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jan 28, 2022 9:03:48 GMT
"§∆_" means "§∆_"; §∆_=§∆_ If you would know what it meant you wouldn't write what you had written. And even as the written it wouldn't be correct. At the same time, the symbol isn't meaningless.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Feb 2, 2022 21:30:07 GMT
"§∆_" means "§∆_"; §∆_=§∆_ If you would know what it meant you wouldn't write what you had written. And even as the written it wouldn't be correct. At the same time, the symbol isn't meaningless. False, I wouldn't have written it unless I knew what it meant. At minimum, considering it can have multiple meanings, it means itself as §∆_=§∆_. Its meaning is grounded in the law of identity.
|
|