To say there is not 100% of anything
is itself
a claim of 100% of that issue.
There are 100%'s out there, such as Pythagoras' triangle.
And this is precisely why there is so much calamity in the world
because the foundation of such axiomatic truth has and is
being subverted by liars and fraudsters. That is what my thesis
There may be a some slippery definition in terms of what you
mean by royalty too, because the 'royals' are all maskers that i
see; and once a month i have to wear a hanky on my face to
go and buy quality cat-food for my ageing 'kittens'. Other than
that absolute insult to my dignity and intelligence; i am mostly
free of the nonsense, even though I have to darn my baggies
lest they disintegrate and cannot even recall the last time i
had a lamb-chop. Though sometimes I have to snarl like a
wolf to keep the hounds of hell and their rabid sheeple at bay,
that is nothing new.
Does that make me a poor royal?
"Blessed are the poor, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven"
Yes I realized the contradiction in my statement but unfortunately I don't know of another way of attempting to convey the point I'm trying to make other than to use this horrifically inadequate English language so if you have a way of avoiding these ironic contradictions in speech while still somewhat effectively conveying a meaning to another person I'm all ears
Not sure what other language you recommend?
I am aiming at French, but for purely aesthetic reasons.
Because logic is logic; and the failing of any language
is that we are trying to convey a virtually infinite set
of ideas with limited words. Using the same word
in more than one context can look like contradiction
when its just a semantic problem.
As it is, English has about five times more words than
any other language; but its still not enough; nowhere
near enough.
The paradox becomes apparent when we acknowledge
that there are foundational perfect types of knowledge,
and yet imperfections seem to emanate from these.
How is this possible?
Its only a paradox because we see the foundation
of our being as logical, which is a fallacy.
The foundation of being is Creative;
and Creativity necessitates falsehood as well as logic.
In fact there can be no logical reason for logic to exist;
logic is a subset of creativity; aesthetics and ethics.
Now the physical world is perfectly logical.
Its only the mind that can generate falsehood;
because the mind has Creativity at its essence.
So we MUST conclude that our universe is fundamentally
a dualism. The mind is not an emanation of the physical
world; because if it was, the mind would be perfectly
logical, because the physical world is perfectly logical.
----------------------------------
On a semantic note, I know its painful to continually
qualify universal adjectives with 'mostly' or 'absolutely',
but we are in a philosophy discussion so its kinda vital
to be clear on the notion.
----------------------------------
We do seem to be enslaved. But its a karmic enslavement.
I could, for instance, take a risk and try and end the
mask mandate where I am entirely; just like I ended
the lockdowns twice; by sheer force of will and ego.
But would that be egotistical? And thus make it worse?
I had not planned on doing that the last two times; i was
just surfing the waves of karma and following instinct.
Surely its someone else's turn to grasp the glory of
victory? Must I take ALL the risks 'round here?
As it was, there were one or two corpses in the wake
of that thunder which Thor and Christ stirred within my soul.
Keep your thoughts focused on truth and ethic; and
you will become freedom.
Its a karmic slavery; like most slavery that is not just
a consequence of bad luck. But bad luck can be
decimated by bravery too.
Perhaps you need to read
"The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, Unbeliever".
Those 'fantasy' novels are virtually religion to me.
Who loves his life will lose it,
who gives up his life, will save it.