|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jul 6, 2021 20:32:15 GMT
Thinking is the formation of concepts.
The formation of concepts is the division of phenomenon.
A unified reality is divided through the formation of concepts.
The division of reality is the formation of opposition within reality.
The opposition of reality is contradiction.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jul 13, 2021 17:13:49 GMT
This thread confuses me. Oh boy 1. To form a concept is to seperate it from the whole of all phenomena. 2. This seperation results in opposition as a gap appears separating the phenomenon. 3. To form the concept of the whole is a contradiction considering you are separating being from nothing. Being opposed nothing. 4. The concept of the whole, as a contradiction, is the voiding of void or a negation of negation. This is a contradiction of contradiction thus eliminating the contradiction much in the same manner the fallacy of circularity is negated by the fallacy of circularity when self applied. 5. Being occurs through contradiction. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 14, 2021 2:51:34 GMT
To 2. Okay, maybe you have some your explanations, okay. I was asking about that we couldn't do it anyhow except for stating it. There's no other way. It's just a logical way: 2^n - is a number of subclasses in each class. But this formula could be different. For instance, if 2^8 - is a number of subclasses for 8 objects in a class, then 8^2 is a number of pairs in the class. To 1. Again. Okay, you can say that 'reality' is so and so. But you can't say that the true one reality - what we see, hear, taste, etc is the same as what we mentally think about it. Previoulsly you took neurons as an example, but the neurons are the world's fact, not a mind one. So, you have to investigate the whole universe to answer the question about the reality. And since we haven't done it yet, nobody can be sure about what the universe is, and as the inference - what the reality is. 1. The universe as self observable necessitates all as observed. It contains the whole through the parts considering the parts are cycles with the universe itself being the summation of these parts as a cycle in itself. It is what it is composed of. We know the universe as a whole is considering we embody this whole through the concept of the "whole". This concept of the whole is the negation of Nothingness as the the contradiction of contradiction (given all concepts are contradictive). 2. We what hear, taste, etc. exists through the mind as memory. 3. To observe all things is to be imprinted by all things. To be imprinted by all things is to not seperate things through filters. You said: the reality is 1, 2, 3... So, all what you can say is about the method to find it. Yet a method might depend on the facts. Even if ones of your definitions would be true, you wouldn't have collected enough info to say what reality is. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 10, 2021 21:41:25 GMT
1. The universe as self observable necessitates all as observed. It contains the whole through the parts considering the parts are cycles with the universe itself being the summation of these parts as a cycle in itself. It is what it is composed of. We know the universe as a whole is considering we embody this whole through the concept of the "whole". This concept of the whole is the negation of Nothingness as the the contradiction of contradiction (given all concepts are contradictive). 2. We what hear, taste, etc. exists through the mind as memory. 3. To observe all things is to be imprinted by all things. To be imprinted by all things is to not seperate things through filters. You said: the reality is 1, 2, 3... So, all what you can say is about the method to find it. Yet a method might depend on the facts. Even if ones of your definitions would be true, you wouldn't have collected enough info to say what reality is. 1. Methods result in facts and the method is justified by the facts produced. 2. Methods are facts as they state the relationship between things. For example the scientific method is a fact as it points to the relationship between the hypothesis and test. 3. To start with the premise the "universe is conscious" makes it in fact conscious of itself as nothing else exists outside "all that there is". |
|
