|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 17, 2020 4:39:52 GMT
A definition of God includes "all that exists" thus equating a belief in all existence as existing to a hallucination, ie God is a hallucination, is to result in contradiction given one is calling the very totality of reality they live in to a hallucination.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 20, 2020 19:37:55 GMT
And where did you learn this concept? Where does one learn the number 1? Either your parents or your babysitter depends on who you spend the most time with as a child
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 24, 2020 23:57:29 GMT
Where does one learn the number 1? Either your parents or your babysitter depends on who you spend the most time with as a child And they where in turn taught the same way, but it does not answer where the concept of the number 1 comes from.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 25, 2020 15:49:23 GMT
Either your parents or your babysitter depends on who you spend the most time with as a child And they where in turn taught the same way, but it does not answer where the concept of the number 1 comes from. To the best of my knowledge it's from a Brahmic script of ancient India. It was transmitted to Europe via Arabic during the Middle Ages
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 25, 2020 17:36:19 GMT
And they where in turn taught the same way, but it does not answer where the concept of the number 1 comes from. To the best of my knowledge it's from a Brahmic script of ancient India. It was transmitted to Europe via Arabic during the Middle Ages Rome had the concept of the number 1 as well, if memory serves you are talking about 0. Yet it does not answer where the concept of 1, or 0, comes from. Where did Rome, or the Brahmic script, get these numbers?
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 26, 2020 1:02:12 GMT
How about you directly answer my question? Although I'm going to assume the answer would be your imagination just like the rest of your ideologies and Concepts come from.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 26, 2020 2:21:55 GMT
How about you directly answer my question? Although I'm going to assume the answer would be your imagination just like the rest of your ideologies and Concepts come from. The answer to your question lies within the answer to mine. Where did the concept of 1 come from? Where did Rome/Brahmic Scriptures observe it?
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 26, 2020 4:54:38 GMT
We can only assume the answer It's impassable to confirm 100% with out a doubt what the answer is because we weren't alive when that day came. So ill let you assume the answer seeing as your so good at doing that.
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Dec 26, 2020 16:02:15 GMT
If GOD = all that exists [the totality of Being -- in the infinite course of time or Change], then there is no need to use the word "god" at all; it will suffice to say that the Universe = all that exists. To those who believe that there is a God, no matter how they define it: Is God a person(hence distinct from everything else)? This question takes us into religions, for in all religions, God is a person, or the gods are persons, and it is here that the question arises as to whether the claimed gods exist or are nothing more than the wishful thinking of some myth makers. {I myself have already written about the aetiology/origins of the gods, since the very historical beliefs in gods requires an explanation as to how gods are formed in human minds to begin with.} ……..and a Happy New year!!
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 26, 2020 17:20:14 GMT
We can only assume the answer It's impassable to confirm 100% with out a doubt what the answer is because we weren't alive when that day came. So ill let you assume the answer seeing as your so good at doing that. You did not answer the question where 1 comes from. Where does 1 come from?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 26, 2020 17:29:30 GMT
If GOD = all that exists [the totality of Being -- in the infinite course of time or Change], then there is no need to use the word "god" at all; it will suffice to say that the Universe = all that exists. To those who believe that there is a God, no matter how they define it: Is God a person(hence distinct from everything else)? This question takes us into religions, for in all religions, God is a person, or the gods are persons, and it is here that the question arises as to whether the claimed gods exist or are nothing more than the wishful thinking of some myth makers. {I myself have already written about the aetiology/origins of the gods, since the very historical beliefs in gods requires an explanation as to how gods are formed in human minds to begin with.} ……..and a Happy New year!! The totality of being necessitates all phenomenon as connected with this connectivity necessitating the emergent phenomenon of God as connected to the totality of being. God as an emergent phenomenon is connected to the totality of being considering God emerges from this totality. God = All that exists.
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Dec 26, 2020 23:37:06 GMT
If GOD = all that exists [the totality of Being -- in the infinite course of time or Change], then there is no need to use the word "god" at all; it will suffice to say that the Universe = all that exists. To those who believe that there is a God, no matter how they define it: Is God a person(hence distinct from everything else)? This question takes us into religions, for in all religions, God is a person, or the gods are persons, and it is here that the question arises as to whether the claimed gods exist or are nothing more than the wishful thinking of some myth makers. {I myself have already written about the aetiology/origins of the gods, since the very historical beliefs in gods requires an explanation as to how gods are formed in human minds to begin with.} ……..and a Happy New year!! The totality of being necessitates all phenomenon // as connected with this connectivity //necessitating //the emergent phenomenon of God as connected to the totality of being. God as an emergent phenomenon is connected to the totality of being considering God emerges from this totality. God = All that exists. My immediate reaction to your conclusion has been "non sequitur", but this may be so because I find it difficult to follow the syntax of your language. I placed double slashes where my difficulties arise. [sorry, by mistake I punched "I like this"]
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 27, 2020 0:21:42 GMT
The totality of being necessitates all phenomenon // as connected with this connectivity //necessitating //the emergent phenomenon of God as connected to the totality of being. God as an emergent phenomenon is connected to the totality of being considering God emerges from this totality. God = All that exists. My immediate reaction to your conclusion has been "non sequitur", but this may be so because I find it difficult to follow the syntax of your language. I placed double slashes where my difficulties arise. [sorry, by mistake I punched "I like this"] All phenomenon are connected through the totality, thus the phenomenon of totality and the phenomena God are connected.
|
|
|
Post by nobeernolife on Dec 27, 2020 20:10:43 GMT
Well yes, you could then define "infinity" as god. But since obviously infinity exists, then obviously god exists, so you are yourself in the foot.
How am I "in the foot" if I am saying God exists? ---- Typo. Should have been "shoot yourself in the foot".
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 28, 2020 6:06:38 GMT
We can only assume the answer It's impassable to confirm 100% with out a doubt what the answer is because we weren't alive when that day came. So ill let you assume the answer seeing as your so good at doing that. You did not answer the question where 1 comes from. Where does 1 come from? First cause is a very difficult thing to prove because it requires being there. Likewise your question is irrational because no person alive today knows the answer to it. Now are you asking where I got my personal #1?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 28, 2020 16:54:36 GMT
How am I "in the foot" if I am saying God exists? ---- Typo. Should have been "shoot yourself in the foot". If the totality of being exists, therefore God exists. How am I shooting myself in the foot?
|
|