|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 24, 2020 17:34:51 GMT
In dividing an apple into 2,3,4,5...etc. pieces is to divide the apple into singular entities in themselves given each piece is equivalent to one. One cannot be observed on its own terms except through other ones thus necessitating each individual piece as empty in itself.
This can be seen in a line where the line cannot be observed except in relation to other lines which it both composes and is composed of.
Dually this same nature can be seen in 0, through a 0d point, where the point on its own terms cannot be observed given it is fundamentally nothing. The point is observed through its progression to another point with this progression resulting in the form of a line. In 0 progressing to 0 an equation of 0=0 occurs which is embodied spatially under the line. This 0=0 results in the first one given the line as a quantifiable entity begins its existence. One begins it equivocation to another one, as 1=1, when the line changes into another line through the 0d point.
Even then the point is only observed as the change from one line into another and as such is not so much a thing in itself but rather a mode of change
Thus 0=0 progresses to 1=1, as formlessness into form, where this equivocation is expressed under x=x given equality under the symbol of "=" occurs through a repetition of said phenomenon. Equality is only observed through repetition.
Under one portion x=x is the equivocation of forms, in another respect it is an equivocation of changes (formlessness) thus necessitating x as a variable equivalent to both form and change.
One as intrinsically empty in itself can be observed under the line fundamentally as a sideways loop, given its beginning and end points are the same 0d point as 0=0, thus necessitating 1 contains zero much in the same manner a loop contains emptiness. This empty nature of 1=1 occurs through its equivalence to the variable of x=x which further equivocates 1 to 0 given both 0 and 1, through the number line, are equivalent to x=x.
In simpler terms the number 1 as an empty loop contains 0=0; thus 1 is a mode of change to further numbers given it cannot exist on its own terms due to its premise being grounded in the emptiness of zero. Zero cannot be observed on it's own terms given it is nothing, and with the number 1 being grounded in this same nature it follows 0 as a mode of change given 1 must change into another 1 if it is to exist.
1 as empty is 1 as a mode of change to further 1. Form contains formlessness, as evidenced through the loop, and this formlessness is the means of change into another form.
1 is an empty loop evidenced by the line containing 0d points because it contains other lines and the fact the line contains both the same beginning and end points as the 0d point. 1 as an empty loop is 1 equating to 0 given all numbers change to further numbers, all ones change into further ones, due to their empty nature.
|
|
|
Post by timefuljoe on Sept 2, 2020 21:25:28 GMT
Elizabeth If you have any more thoughts on the subject, I'd love to hear them. :-)
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 2, 2020 21:34:36 GMT
No, If You Cannot Discern My Intentions, Then You Clearly Are Not As Intelligent As You Think. Your Inability To Understand Context Is Very Clear. AND, Your Audacity To Speak As Ignorantly As You Did About Nikola Tesla Tells Me More Than You Could In A Thousand Of Your Opaque Responses. In Other Words, I Already Know You're Here For Your Ego, Not Your Heart. Your Apathetic And Soulless Nihilistic Tone Tells Me All I Need To Know About Your Future, And The Credibility Of Your Asinine Rhetoric That Is Only There To Shield You From Your Own Existential Limitations. It's Not My Fault That You Cannot See The "Matrix", That The Twin Towers Fell In Year 2001 ( 667+667+667), Exactly 6+6+7 Years Before 2020, And T-win T-owers Is The 20th-20th Letter, For Year 2020, That " Ground Zero" Is The " Zero Point" Of The "Matrix", While Gravity = 6.67 G, Therefore Understanding These Intricacies Is Something You'll Never Have The Privilege To Know, As Long As You Continue To Be A Void, Instead Of A Voice. The World Is Not What You Think It Is, Or Were Taught Since Birth: Well, if you're decided on that then I'll not burden this thread any longer with this conversation. I Only Decided It Based On Your Tone At The Time, If You Take Back The Ignorant Statements You Made About Nikola Tesla, One Of The Most Intelligent Minds To Exist On This Planet, And Admit You Lack Knowledge On Nikola Tesla To Say Anything About Him, I Wouldn't Be So Harsh, But Your Ego Is A Fickle And Stubborn Device Of The Primitive Aspect In Your Brain, The Brain Has A "Function" That Closes Itself Off To Higher And More Advanced Ways Of Evolving Its Ability To Process Information, And You Have To Be Fierce To Dissolve It.
|
|