|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Aug 17, 2018 22:13:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by just10sp on Aug 27, 2018 23:40:28 GMT
So pretty much, 9/11 and Building 7, was Satan and those he has deceived and corrupted.
Date: 9+11=11
254th day of the year 2+5+4=11
Both buildings had 110 stories.
Building 7 had 47 stories 4+7=11
The buildings had a total of 21,800 windows 2+1+8+0+0=11
First plane to hit was Flight 11
92 people were on board 9+2=11
Flight 11 had crew members on board.
Collapsed at 10:28 AM =11
Built from 1966 to 1977, 11 years to build.
Manhattan Island is called in reference to God and Dr. Manhattan.
|
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Aug 28, 2018 11:52:30 GMT
My familiar builder experts say that this was a controlled demolition. It is obvious! 100 % This is especially true of building 7 Not you too? |
|
flow3
Full Member
Posts: 147
Likes: 82
|
Post by flow3 on Aug 28, 2018 17:40:31 GMT
I am not completely sure but it doesn't seem like a controlled demolition. Sheer energy that was released by the airplane just crushing into the building is about 450 MJ without counting the gasoline explosion later on. After that its classic mechanics 101. Mass moment of intertia of the upper part of the building did everything else. Check parallel axis theorem.
|
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Aug 28, 2018 18:28:33 GMT
I am not completely sure but it doesn't seem like a controlled demolition. Sheer energy that was released by the airplane just crushing into the building is about 450 MJ without counting the gasoline explosion later on. After that its classic mechanics 101. Mass moment of intertia of the upper part of the building did everything else. Check parallel axis theorem. |
|
flow3
Full Member
Posts: 147
Likes: 82
|
Post by flow3 on Aug 28, 2018 20:01:34 GMT
I am not completely sure but it doesn't seem like a controlled demolition. Sheer energy that was released by the airplane just crushing into the building is about 450 MJ without counting the gasoline explosion later on. After that its classic mechanics 101. Mass moment of intertia of the upper part of the building did everything else. Check parallel axis theorem. Initially Titanic was tought as unsinkable, but it sunk. There were also early commercial airplanes that were throughly tested and found completely safe, but they still crashed after certain hours of flying. Both Titanic and those early airplane had design flaw. I'm not counting out anything due to lack of data, and thus I'm not completely sure. I just gave the most likely scenario why would it collapse. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 28, 2018 20:26:37 GMT
Initially Titanic was tought as unsinkable, but it sunk. There were also early commercial airplanes that were throughly tested and found completely safe, but they still crashed after certain hours of flying. Both Titanic and those early airplane had design flaw. I'm not counting out anything due to lack of data, and thus I'm not completely sure. I just gave the most likely scenario why would it collapse. There's actually a thread about Titanic in history section where it was kind of interesting and shows Titanic under the water has a different name on it origionally as if a different ship was renamed to being Titanic and real Titanic was switched. Anyway you can check that that if you haven't yet. It was interesrimg to me so you may or may not like it. Has a video too. Shrug |
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Aug 28, 2018 20:27:23 GMT
Initially Titanic was tought as unsinkable, but it sunk. There were also early commercial airplanes that were throughly tested and found completely safe, but they still crashed after certain hours of flying. Both Titanic and those early airplane had design flaw. I'm not counting out anything due to lack of data, and thus I'm not completely sure. I just gave the most likely scenario why would it collapse. How about building number 7? Titanic? It was a myth about its unsinkable .. practice showed that the ship was unfit. |
|
flow3
Full Member
Posts: 147
Likes: 82
|
Post by flow3 on Aug 28, 2018 20:31:50 GMT
Initially Titanic was tought as unsinkable, but it sunk. There were also early commercial airplanes that were throughly tested and found completely safe, but they still crashed after certain hours of flying. Both Titanic and those early airplane had design flaw. I'm not counting out anything due to lack of data, and thus I'm not completely sure. I just gave the most likely scenario why would it collapse. There's actually a thread about Titanic in history section where it was kind of interesting and shows Titanic under the water has a different name on it origionally as if a different ship was renamed to being Titanic and real Titanic was switched. Anyway you can check that that if you haven't yet. It was interesrimg to me so you may or may not like it. Has a video too.  As far as I know Titanic was constructed so that front deck (forecastle) has like two chambers so in case it hits an iceberg they could seal the first chamber and nothing would happen. However the captian steered the wheel and Titanic hit the side where hull integrity was much weaker and it resulted in water leakage. |
|
|
|
Post by just10sp on Aug 28, 2018 20:46:32 GMT
The original design of the Titanic was switched for the owners to save tons of money, they instead used very cheap materials and the whole point of building the Titanic was practically made pointless as the new ones like bronze could cave very easily as they did when it sunk.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 28, 2018 22:02:38 GMT
But....Titanic was the first ship ever to sink from an iceberg I believe. Isn't that a bit odd?
|
|
|
|
Post by just10sp on Aug 28, 2018 22:34:01 GMT
But....Titanic was the first ship ever to sink from an iceberg I believe. Isn't that a bit odd? I’m not sure if that is true, I doubt it. |
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Aug 28, 2018 22:46:27 GMT
But....Titanic was the first ship ever to sink from an iceberg I believe. Isn't that a bit odd? I’m not sure if that is true, I doubt it. It wasn’t the first or the last, but that doesn’t matter. The untold story behind it is what is very interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 28, 2018 22:49:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Aug 28, 2018 22:55:16 GMT
I actually just found that story myself and was about to share it but you beat me to it  |
|
|
|
Post by just10sp on Aug 28, 2018 23:00:40 GMT
Ohh, I see ;p
|
|
