|
Post by Elizabeth on May 26, 2018 23:18:30 GMT
I hope not. But there's a high chance I think.
What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on May 28, 2018 1:12:38 GMT
I think there will be but I don't think it's on the priority list for Americans It is for progressive liberal Americans of which there are quite a few. Seems like the US is split in half for the most part when it comes to political ideologies. I live in California so progressives are a lot more common here, makes me want to get out of this state
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2018 2:43:42 GMT
Women aren't meant to lead, they are meant to follow. Men lead to future and women are to busy creating and raising the future (i.e. the next generation.) I agree! Hey Elizabeth, this is first time I am seeing that a 'women' has agreed to this statement. Otherwise, I have normally seen resistance from such statements.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on May 28, 2018 2:48:08 GMT
Hey Elizabeth, this is first time I am seeing that a 'women' has agreed to this statement. Otherwise, I have normally seen resistance from such statements. Yeah, it's just the bible doesn't want women in much leadership roles so I stay away from big roles like that. Shrug Plus it's less work for women without that so there's always a bright side
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2018 2:50:50 GMT
I do not think she will be because she can become too scandalous President! In addition, many American southerners do not like Nikki. For example @cornbread ! Nikki Haley is corrupted scum, she is a filthy scalawag, and she's a jewish puppet (that's not even being conspiratorial.) Women aren't meant to lead, they are meant to follow. Men lead to future and women are to busy creating and raising the future (i.e. the next generation.) Also, don't forget Clovis Merovingian , she took down our flag. Rich brat she is. I know, how these NRIs are.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2018 2:52:08 GMT
Hey Elizabeth, this is first time I am seeing that a 'women' has agreed to this statement. Otherwise, I have normally seen resistance from such statements. Yeah, it's just the bible doesn't want women in much leadership roles so I stay away from big roles like that. Plus it's less work for women without that so there's always a bright side Anyways, it's good, if you think it that way, because, even in bible, if it is written, which means, christ did not want females to be exploited, and not to come in contact with males.
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on May 28, 2018 4:31:26 GMT
I'm probably willing to concede this one. Men and women are equal in value but different in roles. Men are the leaders, women the raisers of children.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on May 28, 2018 4:34:30 GMT
I'm probably willing to concede this one. Men and women are equal in value but different in roles. Men are the leaders, women the raisers of children. Exactly! We're equal in value but play different roles based on what God designed us for. Clovis, always the genius Galatians 3:28 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus
|
|
fashtag
New Member
Posts: 43
Likes: 27
Ethnicity: German/English
Country: Texas, USA
Politics: Right
|
Post by fashtag on May 28, 2018 10:04:33 GMT
It's always great to see women agree with natural gender roles. I'm pessimistic about the future of America, I think we are headed for a slow decline and this will include more women and racial/religious minorities in positions of power. At this point, I would rather a fast decline than a slow one. This corrupt system must die so that a new one can supplant it. Bring on the divisive anti-traditional value leaders. This is a cultural battle that needs to happen, it's Marxism or traditionalism. One of the reasons to be an atheist. What is that reason, exactly?
|
|
cvolt
Full Member
Posts: 103
Likes: 139
|
Post by cvolt on May 28, 2018 10:34:44 GMT
I think there will be but I don't think it's on the priority list for Americans It is for progressive liberal Americans of which there are quite a few. Seems like the US is split in half for the most part when it comes to political ideologies. I live in California so progressives are a lot more common here, makes me want to get out of this state Yes you need to run far away from that place! :p
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on May 28, 2018 14:35:31 GMT
It is for progressive liberal Americans of which there are quite a few. Seems like the US is split in half for the most part when it comes to political ideologies. I live in California so progressives are a lot more common here, makes me want to get out of this state Yes you need to run far away from that place! :p I would but I can’t leave Elizabeth to fend for herself xP
|
|
|
Post by joustos on May 28, 2018 20:19:21 GMT
I hope not. But there's a high chance I think. What do you think? I wonder why you hope NOT. I don't think that all women are like Hillary whose Foundation was enriched by the contributions of the "High Priest" [So...….] Like Ryan and other male politicians, she was "bought" by the Billionnaire, but, despite the financial and "approval" support, she lost. By refusing such a support, a woman running for the presidency would have to be wealthier than Trump. So, I do not expect any woman running for the presidency in the near future, especially if one is bothered by all the garbage that the Globalists throw at unsold republicans.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on May 28, 2018 22:20:02 GMT
I hope not. But there's a high chance I think. What do you think? I wonder why you hope NOT. I don't think that all women are like Hillary whose Foundation was enriched by the contributions of the "High Priest" [So...….] Like Ryan and other male politicians, she was "bought" by the Billionnaire, but, despite the financial and "approval" support, she lost. By refusing such a support, a woman running for the presidency would have to be wealthier than Trump. So, I do not expect any woman running for the presidency in the near future, especially if one is bothered by all the garbage that the Globalists throw at unsold republicans. It's because of my religious views. Women should stay out of big leadership roles Shrug
|
|
falconh
Junior Member
Posts: 83
Likes: 32
|
Post by falconh on Jun 4, 2018 18:11:10 GMT
I think it doesn't matter as long as she could be the better choice for the country...
|
|