|
Post by Διαμονδ on Mar 14, 2018 23:18:49 GMT
Russia calls UK’s ‘hostile’ actions a provocation, vows response:The UK’s hostile actions against Russia under the pretext of the poisoning of ex-double agent Sergei Skripal are an unprecedented provocation which won’t be left without a response, Russia’s Foreign Ministry said. UK Prime Minister Theresa May accused Russia of using a chemical weapon on British soil, suggesting a set of measures to retaliate against Moscow. Those include the expulsion of 23 diplomats, limiting ties and freezing Russian state assets in the UK. The British move is “an unprecedentedly rude provocation, which undermines the foundations of a normal dialogue between our countries,” the ministry said in a statement. The ministry said that "the British government chose confrontation with Russia" instead of completing the investigation and using international formats “including those in the framework of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons [OPCW].” "It’s obvious that by opting for unilateral and non-transparent methods of investigating this incident, the British authorities have once again tried to unleash an indiscriminate anti-Russian campaign,” the statement read. Moscow said that it was “unacceptable and unworthy” for the UK leadership to further escalate tensions in relations with Russia “in pursuit of its own deplorable political aims.” “Of course, our response [to the UK sanctions] is forthcoming,” the Foreign Ministry concluded. Former Russian-UK double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter remain in critical condition after being discovered slumped on a bench in Salisbury in early March. The UK authorities claim that they were poisoned with a Soviet-engineered nerve agent called Novichok. Russia has said that it’s open to cooperation with the UK on the Skripal case if it’s carried out in accordance with international law and Moscow is treated as an equal partner in the probe. Russia has also officially requested that the UK provide all the case files regarding the incident, but was turned down. www.rt.com/usa/421302-uk-hostile-action-rude-provocation/
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Mar 15, 2018 0:19:53 GMT
If your ancestors saw you! Gavrilo Princip - for example!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 0:26:05 GMT
Διαμονδ Ahh, the Karadjordjevic dynasty period and infamous Black Hand. They harmed this society the most in recent history. Wounds that were inflicted by their ascension and reign to the throne never healed in Serbia. Unfortunately people are too blind to see it.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Mar 15, 2018 0:31:43 GMT
Διαμονδ Ahh, the Karadjordjevic dynasty period and infamous Black Hand. They harmed this society the most in recent history. Wounds that were inflicted by their ascension and reign to the throne never healed in Serbia. Unfortunately people are too blind to see it. In the history of Serbia and the Balkans there were many heroes! You know this better than me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 5:00:53 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 7:06:18 GMT
Διαμονδ Ahh, the Karadjordjevic dynasty period and infamous Black Hand. They harmed this society the most in recent history. Wounds that were inflicted by their ascension and reign to the throne never healed in Serbia. Unfortunately people are too blind to see it. In the history of Serbia and the Balkans there were many heroes! You know this better than me! Well modern generation of Serbs is raised by generation of losers. They lost all wars of 90's and Yugoslavia
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Mar 15, 2018 9:30:36 GMT
London just did not forget what role the Soviet Union played in the collapse of British colonialism!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 9:45:54 GMT
London just did not forget what role the Soviet Union played in the collapse of British colonialism! Once east india company took over, british empire was meant to FALL.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 9:47:14 GMT
London just did not forget what role the Soviet Union played in the collapse of British colonialism! Once east india company took over, british empire was meant to FALL. For what reason do you like UK and justify its rule over India?
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Mar 15, 2018 9:48:01 GMT
London just did not forget what role the Soviet Union played in the collapse of British colonialism! Once east india company took over, british empire was meant to FALL. Yes! But after the creation of the UN, it was easier to recognize the independence of states!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 9:54:56 GMT
Once east india company took over, british empire was meant to FALL. For what reason do you like UK and justify its rule over India? It's because they preserved many of the old races here, and before they arrived here, they did lot of anthropological surveys, and many indologists came up with correct interpretation of sanskritic texts, and then they realized that long long time back, here also, some eurasian or central asian people had invaded the subcontinent, and then, they chartered out their mappings based on that. ACtually, the name indian means mongrel breeds, HINDOOS means mixed race people. This name is not present in the old aryan texts. That's why when Diamond said that aryans were not considered good race, it is because of those interpretation of non aryans, because, those old aryans were really harsh on these mixed race indians, actually. Then britishers started to do what those old overlords were doing, trying to extinct these mixed race indians, but, they too could not anihilate them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 10:02:39 GMT
For what reason do you like UK and justify its rule over India? It's because they preserved many of the old races here, and before they arrived here, they did lot of anthropological surveys, and many indologists came up with correct interpretation of sanskritic texts, and then they realized that long long time back, here also, some eurasian or central asian people had invaded the subcontinent, and then, they chartered out their mappings based on that. ACtually, the name indian means mongrel breeds, HINDOOS means mixed race people. This name is not present in the old aryan texts. That's why when Diamond said that aryans were not considered good race, it is because of those interpretation of non aryans, because, those old aryans were really harsh on these mixed race indians, actually. Then britishers started to do what those old overlords were doing, trying to extinct these mixed race indians, but, they too could not anihilate them. Yes, old history can be fascinating but the way I see they were exploiting riches of Indian soil. Your riches. That alone can make you poor, and it did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 10:04:13 GMT
It's because they preserved many of the old races here, and before they arrived here, they did lot of anthropological surveys, and many indologists came up with correct interpretation of sanskritic texts, and then they realized that long long time back, here also, some eurasian or central asian people had invaded the subcontinent, and then, they chartered out their mappings based on that. ACtually, the name indian means mongrel breeds, HINDOOS means mixed race people. This name is not present in the old aryan texts. That's why when Diamond said that aryans were not considered good race, it is because of those interpretation of non aryans, because, those old aryans were really harsh on these mixed race indians, actually. Then britishers started to do what those old overlords were doing, trying to extinct these mixed race indians, but, they too could not anihilate them. Yes, old history can be fascinating but the way I see they were exploiting riches of Indian soil. Your riches. That alone can make you poor, and it did. ha ha, I am not much into the fanatic nationalis, that they LOOTED US, MADE US BEGGAR. Fact is, it were the indian middle men, who were selling those things. Why the indians did not fight?
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Mar 15, 2018 10:05:06 GMT
For what reason do you like UK and justify its rule over India? It's because they preserved many of the old races here, and before they arrived here, they did lot of anthropological surveys, and many indologists came up with correct interpretation of sanskritic texts, and then they realized that long long time back, here also, some eurasian or central asian people had invaded the subcontinent, and then, they chartered out their mappings based on that. ACtually, the name indian means mongrel breeds, HINDOOS means mixed race people. This name is not present in the old aryan texts. That's why when Diamond said that aryans were not considered good race, it is because of those interpretation of non aryans, because, those old aryans were really harsh on these mixed race indians, actually. Then britishers started to do what those old overlords were doing, trying to extinct these mixed race indians, but, they too could not anihilate them. A simple fact! All that the Anglo-Saxons have done and is doing is only in their interests! They did not think about the welfare of the Celts, Native Americans, Africans or Indians!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 10:06:16 GMT
Besides, I need not bother, what britishers were doing with indians, because, my ancestors were taken to remote locations, where there were hardly any person traceable, till 30 km, and still were kept overlords and landlords, and also, ensured, that they involve in cousin marriages, so....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 10:07:28 GMT
Yes, old history can be fascinating but the way I see they were exploiting riches of Indian soil. Your riches. That alone can make you poor, and it did. ha ha, I am not much into the fanatic nationalis, that they LOOTED US, MADE US BEGGAR. Fact is, it were the indian middle men, who were selling those things. Why the indians did not fight? Because your ancestors had bows and arrows and they had cannons?
|
|