|
|
UFO Time
Nov 8, 2023 15:12:04 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 8, 2023 15:12:04 GMT
Since there were claims about UFO, and later videos about the alien's autopsy until 00's the world was relatively safe. Surely, there happened the cold war, Vietnam, Afghanistan, the Desert Storm, but these conflicts (except for the Vietnam mostly) were rather conflicts, than wars. Anyway, there were no major terrible events until 00's or 10's, or these 20's. So, I wonder if UFO has anything with this? Can it be participated somehow to those peaceful times?
At least it might be that some brave soldiers killed or infiltrated the alien's camp, or maybe they destroy the great danger. And since they did it, others aliens were either afraid of intrusion, or a large amount of them was stopped. Or, if this scenario doesn't work, then maybe aliens had been among us or visited us, and thankfully to them those ~50 years were great.
I suppose it's possible that somehow the aliens could be involved into this: either some of their forces were stopped, or they decided to visit us and made some of our days better. I also know today not many ones believe in UFO, but who knows.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Nov 12, 2023 6:38:51 GMT
The data in astronomical observations actually shows strong evidence of numerous alien civilizations! Except, the problem is that the media views that data through the WRONG science/physics paradigm; and thus it concludes the IMPOSSIBLE notion of "binary black-hole mergers". Anyone who fully comprehends the fatal flaws in Einstein's math, is compelled to ask, then: What is GW150914, then really, if its not a "binary black-hole merger'? Let me just briefly give why Black-hole math is just wrong: Nothing gets past the event horizon of the black-hole. Yet they give the 2017 Nobel prize for claiming to 'observe a pair of black holes merge'. Q: How do they merge if they cannot cross each other's event horizon? A: 'Event Horizon' math (Einstein), is just rubbish math. DETAILS HERE: www.flight-light-and-spin.com/LIGO/analysis-gw150914.htm |
|
|
|
UFO Time
Nov 12, 2023 9:06:02 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 12, 2023 9:06:02 GMT
The data in astronomical observations actually shows strong evidence of numerous alien civilizations! Except, the problem is that the media views that data through the WRONG science/physics paradigm; and thus it concludes the IMPOSSIBLE notion of "binary black-hole mergers". Anyone who fully comprehends the fatal flaws in Einstein's math, is compelled to ask, then: What is GW150914, then really, if its not a "binary black-hole merger'? Let me just briefly give why Black-hole math is just wrong: Nothing gets past the event horizon of the black-hole. Yet they give the 2017 Nobel prize for claiming to 'observe a pair of black holes merge'. Q: How do they merge if they cannot cross each other's event horizon? A: 'Event Horizon' math (Einstein), is just rubbish math. DETAILS HERE: www.flight-light-and-spin.com/LIGO/analysis-gw150914.htmSo, this is another argument that UFO exists, right? I don't really know about the event horizon. I don't understand anything what Einstein said, since this theory was what I would never understood. Actually, I like pre-Galileo, or even pre-Copernicus astronomy, since the scientists before that never told that two things with any masses have the same speed. No matter how many times I dropped items, the lighter thing was, the slower it flew. So, my daily experience tells me that heavier things fall faster. The labs - are just labs. They change the environment, and the circumstances into something not fully natural, that's why should I trust them, instead of the natural conditions? |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Nov 15, 2023 19:39:04 GMT
The data in astronomical observations actually shows strong evidence of numerous alien civilizations! Except, the problem is that the media views that data through the WRONG science/physics paradigm; and thus it concludes the IMPOSSIBLE notion of "binary black-hole mergers". Anyone who fully comprehends the fatal flaws in Einstein's math, is compelled to ask, then: What is GW150914, then really, if its not a "binary black-hole merger'? Let me just briefly give why Black-hole math is just wrong: Nothing gets past the event horizon of the black-hole. Yet they give the 2017 Nobel prize for claiming to 'observe a pair of black holes merge'. Q: How do they merge if they cannot cross each other's event horizon? A: 'Event Horizon' math (Einstein), is just rubbish math. DETAILS HERE: www.flight-light-and-spin.com/LIGO/analysis-gw150914.htmSo, this is another argument that UFO exists, right? I don't really know about the event horizon. I don't understand anything what Einstein said, since this theory was what I would never understood. Actually, I like pre-Galileo, or even pre-Copernicus astronomy, since the scientists before that never told that two things with any masses have the same speed. No matter how many times I dropped items, the lighter thing was, the slower it flew. So, my daily experience tells me that heavier things fall faster. The labs - are just labs. They change the environment, and the circumstances into something not fully natural, that's why should I trust them, instead of the natural conditions?
Weight, density, and aerodynamic shape all play a role.
But if we use 2 objects of identical shape and density,
then, regardless of weight, they fall to earth in equal time.
If we remove the atmosphere, then we also remove the role of the aerodynamic shape...
Dropping a ping-pong-ball is not the same as dropping a marble because the density plays the significant role.
however
What this link
is saying is that ...
we need to be clear in our minds the fundamental difference between the observable data, and the mathematical framework we use to interpret that data.
When you look at this LIGO data :
through a Newtonian lens, then
we do not get their 'black hole merger', because that is an impossible fiction as it is
fundamentally illogical, and anyone who claims
otherwise is simply being a troll.
But instead we get this:
;-j
|
|
|
|
UFO Time
Nov 15, 2023 19:51:02 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 15, 2023 19:51:02 GMT
So, this is another argument that UFO exists, right? I don't really know about the event horizon. I don't understand anything what Einstein said, since this theory was what I would never understood. Actually, I like pre-Galileo, or even pre-Copernicus astronomy, since the scientists before that never told that two things with any masses have the same speed. No matter how many times I dropped items, the lighter thing was, the slower it flew. So, my daily experience tells me that heavier things fall faster. The labs - are just labs. They change the environment, and the circumstances into something not fully natural, that's why should I trust them, instead of the natural conditions?
Weight, density, and aerodynamic shape all play a role.
But if we use 2 objects of identical shape and density,
then, regardless of weight, they fall to earth in equal time.
If we remove the atmosphere, then we also remove the role of the aerodynamic shape...
Dropping a ping-pong-ball is not the same as dropping a marble because the density plays the significant role.
however
What this link
is saying is that ...
we need to be clear in our minds the fundamental difference between the observable data, and the mathematical framework we use to interpret that data.
When you look at this LIGO data :
through a Newtonian lens, then
we do not get their 'black hole merger', because that is an impossible fiction as it is
fundamentally illogical, and anyone who claims
otherwise is simply being a troll.
But instead we get this:
;-j
This would be dishonest if I say that I understand the graphics. They are difficult to be read by me. As for me, clearance of minds is pre-theoreticall thinking. Any theories are man-made. Hardly to believe a tiny piece of the grey stuff in a skull is able to get and to accumulate the correct description of the universe. |
|
