|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 17, 2023 18:22:26 GMT
The totality is without compare for if it had comparison it would not be the totality, i.e. something would be beyond it. Thingness requires comparison otherwise it is not a thing as there is no distinction which allows the thing to be. The totality is without compare thus it is nothing. Nothing is without comparison, as there is nothing to compare, thus nothingness is the totality as there is no distinction within nothing that separates it from the totality, distinction requires separation and there is no distinction within nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 17, 2023 19:54:35 GMT
In the reality there are no such contradictions. Language has it.
Let's say the round is all what we know. At the edges of this knowledge there's languages, logic, facts. Closer to the center of it – different other knowledge. For your case, your riddle in the middle of the round. But when you're angry and you feel unable to solve this riddle you blame some weird words as 'totalities' or kinda. However, there are plenty of others contradictions and the objects of blame exist. So your attacks on either reality, or something else – is just an attack on some 'land' within the map of your knowledge.
As I've already said the problem is in language. No languages, no problems. Language is the supporter of riddles and confusions. Whales or penguins live happy lives. And if they could speak for a minute they would say "people are completely nuts: they've been possesed by that terrible infection called 'thinking' and all their happiness gone".
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 17, 2023 22:00:38 GMT
In the reality there are no such contradictions. Language has it. Let's say the round is all what we know. At the edges of this knowledge there's languages, logic, facts. Closer to the center of it – different other knowledge. For your case, your riddle in the middle of the round. But when you're angry and you feel unable to solve this riddle you blame some weird words as 'totalities' or kinda. However, there are plenty of others contradictions and the objects of blame exist. So your attacks on either reality, or something else – is just an attack on some 'land' within the map of your knowledge. As I've already said the problem is in language. No languages, no problems. Language is the supporter of riddles and confusions. Whales or penguins live happy lives. And if they could speak for a minute they would say "people are completely nuts: they've been possesed by that terrible infection called 'thinking' and all their happiness gone". To say language has contradictions, and to use language to say it, is to contradict that there are contradictions. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 18, 2023 9:24:43 GMT
In the reality there are no such contradictions. Language has it. Let's say the round is all what we know. At the edges of this knowledge there's languages, logic, facts. Closer to the center of it – different other knowledge. For your case, your riddle in the middle of the round. But when you're angry and you feel unable to solve this riddle you blame some weird words as 'totalities' or kinda. However, there are plenty of others contradictions and the objects of blame exist. So your attacks on either reality, or something else – is just an attack on some 'land' within the map of your knowledge. As I've already said the problem is in language. No languages, no problems. Language is the supporter of riddles and confusions. Whales or penguins live happy lives. And if they could speak for a minute they would say "people are completely nuts: they've been possesed by that terrible infection called 'thinking' and all their happiness gone". To say language has contradictions, and to use language to say it, is to contradict that there are contradictions. How can you say "there's no contradiction" if to mention "contradiction" means that somehow that "contradiction" exist. ("Contradictions" must be known for the those who use them.) Otherwise, you try to hesitate the unknown. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 24, 2023 19:23:25 GMT
In the reality there are no such contradictions. Language has it. Let's say the round is all what we know. At the edges of this knowledge there's languages, logic, facts. Closer to the center of it – different other knowledge. For your case, your riddle in the middle of the round. But when you're angry and you feel unable to solve this riddle you blame some weird words as 'totalities' or kinda. However, there are plenty of others contradictions and the objects of blame exist. So your attacks on either reality, or something else – is just an attack on some 'land' within the map of your knowledge. As I've already said the problem is in language. No languages, no problems. Language is the supporter of riddles and confusions. Whales or penguins live happy lives. And if they could speak for a minute they would say "people are completely nuts: they've been possesed by that terrible infection called 'thinking' and all their happiness gone". Language is part of reality as evident by our conversations. To say language is contradictory is to say reality, at minimum a part of reality, is contradictory. |
|
