Post by gabble on Apr 28, 2023 20:55:38 GMT
Godel's theorems 1 & 2 to be invalid:end in meaninglessness
gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/A-Theory-of-Everything.pdf
gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/GODEL5.pdf
or
www.scribd.com/document/32970323/Godels-incompleteness-theorem-invalid-illegitimate
from
pricegems.com/articles/Dean-Godel.html
"Mr. Dean complains that Gödel "cannot tell us what makes a mathematical statement true", but Gödel's Incompleteness theorems make no attempt to do this"
Godels 1st theorem
“....., there is an arithmetical statement that is true,[1] but not provable in the theory (Kleene 1967, p. 250)
but
Godel did not know what makes a maths statement true
thus his theorem is meaningless
checkmate
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#Mathematics
Gödel thought that the ability to perceive the truth of a mathematical or logical proposition is a matter of intuition, an ability he admitted could be ultimately beyond the scope of a formal theory of logic or mathematics[63][64] and perhaps best considered in the realm of human comprehension and communication, but commented: Ravitch, Harold (1998). "On Gödel's Philosophy of Mathematics".,Solomon, Martin (1998). "On Kurt Gödel's Philosophy of Mathematics"
Magister colin leslie dean
gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/GODEL5.pdf
or
www.scribd.com/document/32970323/Godels-incompleteness-theorem-invalid-illegitimate
from
pricegems.com/articles/Dean-Godel.html
"Mr. Dean complains that Gödel "cannot tell us what makes a mathematical statement true", but Gödel's Incompleteness theorems make no attempt to do this"
Godels 1st theorem
“....., there is an arithmetical statement that is true,[1] but not provable in the theory (Kleene 1967, p. 250)
but
Godel did not know what makes a maths statement true
thus his theorem is meaningless
checkmate
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#Mathematics
Gödel thought that the ability to perceive the truth of a mathematical or logical proposition is a matter of intuition, an ability he admitted could be ultimately beyond the scope of a formal theory of logic or mathematics[63][64] and perhaps best considered in the realm of human comprehension and communication, but commented: Ravitch, Harold (1998). "On Gödel's Philosophy of Mathematics".,Solomon, Martin (1998). "On Kurt Gödel's Philosophy of Mathematics"
