|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 16, 2022 21:19:14 GMT
We may say that complex numbers belongs to a set of irrational numbers, and integers is a subset of real numbers. We may say that Nathan is just four symbols 'n', 'a', 't', and 'h', or to say that it is a part of a name Jonathan. The desk may be interpreted as a table with shelves, and a baseball bat as a wooden stick with a handle and a trunk with a certain form. Each of description or determination - is just a new set of words. Indeed, all what we are doing in such cases are just using new words.
Similar way symbols, numbers, and names exist. We can't find the reality with their presence, but we may speak about them.
This is very interesting point of presence of those deities comparing to the existence of surface structure of neurons. Each configuration of neurons is unstable, and exist only a short period of time. The same is about words: they exist during our pronunciation or thinking (i.e. the inner pronunciation) of them. We just repeat series of vowels in a head, which have curved wave nature, and the neurons accept relevant position inside our heads. Their behaviour is repeating the waves in a way.
Any neurons configurations rush on a surface as well as symbols, numbers or names flow over our heads as words or thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 18, 2022 0:12:09 GMT
We may say that complex numbers belongs to a set of irrational numbers, and integers is a subset of real numbers. We may say that Nathan is just four symbols 'n', 'a', 't', and 'h', or to say that it is a part of a name Jonathan. The desk may be interpreted as a table with shelves, and a baseball bat as a wooden stick with a handle and a trunk with a certain form. Each of description or determination - is just a new set of words. Indeed, all what we are doing in such cases are just using new words. Similar way symbols, numbers, and names exist. We can't find the reality with their presence, but we may speak about them. This is very interesting point of presence of those deities comparing to the existence of surface structure of neurons. Each configuration of neurons is unstable, and exist only a short period of time. The same is about words: they exist during our pronunciation or thinking (i.e. the inner pronunciation) of them. We just repeat series of vowels in a head, which have curved wave nature, and the neurons accept relevant position inside our heads. Their behaviour is repeating the waves in a way. Any neurons configurations rush on a surface as well as symbols, numbers or names flow over our heads as words or thoughts. Such is the futility of that which is relative. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 18, 2022 0:18:45 GMT
We may say that complex numbers belongs to a set of irrational numbers, and integers is a subset of real numbers. We may say that Nathan is just four symbols 'n', 'a', 't', and 'h', or to say that it is a part of a name Jonathan. The desk may be interpreted as a table with shelves, and a baseball bat as a wooden stick with a handle and a trunk with a certain form. Each of description or determination - is just a new set of words. Indeed, all what we are doing in such cases are just using new words. Similar way symbols, numbers, and names exist. We can't find the reality with their presence, but we may speak about them. This is very interesting point of presence of those deities comparing to the existence of surface structure of neurons. Each configuration of neurons is unstable, and exist only a short period of time. The same is about words: they exist during our pronunciation or thinking (i.e. the inner pronunciation) of them. We just repeat series of vowels in a head, which have curved wave nature, and the neurons accept relevant position inside our heads. Their behaviour is repeating the waves in a way. Any neurons configurations rush on a surface as well as symbols, numbers or names flow over our heads as words or thoughts. Such is the futility of that which is relative. Thank you for commenting and advice! I apologize for not answering them all. It's just of not having time or not always having power circuit. As you may know Russia constantly have been damaging our energy structure for two months. So, there are problems with electricity supply which happens often lately. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 18, 2022 0:26:41 GMT
Such is the futility of that which is relative. Thank you for commenting and advice! I apologize for not answering them all. It's just of not having time or not always having power circuit. As you may know Russia constantly have been damaging our energy structure for two months. So, there are problems with electricity supply which happens often lately. Best wishes then. This war will pass as everything passes. The Ukrainian people are in my prayers everyday. |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Nov 18, 2022 8:33:56 GMT
We may say that complex numbers belongs to a set of irrational numbers, and integers is a subset of real numbers. We may say that Nathan is just four symbols 'n', 'a', 't', and 'h', or to say that it is a part of a name Jonathan. The desk may be interpreted as a table with shelves, and a baseball bat as a wooden stick with a handle and a trunk with a certain form. Each of description or determination - is just a new set of words. Indeed, all what we are doing in such cases are just using new words. Similar way symbols, numbers, and names exist. We can't find the reality with their presence, but we may speak about them. This is very interesting point of presence of those deities comparing to the existence of surface structure of neurons. Each configuration of neurons is unstable, and exist only a short period of time. The same is about words: they exist during our pronunciation or thinking (i.e. the inner pronunciation) of them. We just repeat series of vowels in a head, which have curved wave nature, and the neurons accept relevant position inside our heads. Their behaviour is repeating the waves in a way. Any neurons configurations rush on a surface as well as symbols, numbers or names flow over our heads as words or thoughts.
I see 'neuroscience' as being little more than a modern version of alchemy. I tried taking a variety of neurotransmitter simulators, and 're-uptake inhibitors', and they worked nothing at all like the text books say they do.
(Kinda pointless trying to discuss neuroscience if you never took the drugs they claim to have isolated).
Now of course words and mind interact with the body somehow, some way. But since the age of Socrates, there has been zero formal advancement on the topic in the ranks of those that call themselves 'the scientists' (neo-sophists, really).
I suggest reading Rupert Sheldrake, who in "The science delusion", shows ample evidence that the brain does nothing more than cool the blood, whilst the 'seat of awareness' is located at the spine. (Or central nervous system).
We just anthropomorphize and project our position as the brain for the simple
reason that it is situated between the ears and eyes.
Just like soulless spiteful people (like those that pretend to be psychologists around here) project their nihilist inferiority complex onto the universe around them, thinking themselves as a 'parent' who needs to rebuke, scold and demean his/her 'children' by belittling them and abusing them.
Of course that person is just telling us how it was raised to be how they are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 18, 2022 11:26:54 GMT
We may say that complex numbers belongs to a set of irrational numbers, and integers is a subset of real numbers. We may say that Nathan is just four symbols 'n', 'a', 't', and 'h', or to say that it is a part of a name Jonathan. The desk may be interpreted as a table with shelves, and a baseball bat as a wooden stick with a handle and a trunk with a certain form. Each of description or determination - is just a new set of words. Indeed, all what we are doing in such cases are just using new words. Similar way symbols, numbers, and names exist. We can't find the reality with their presence, but we may speak about them. This is very interesting point of presence of those deities comparing to the existence of surface structure of neurons. Each configuration of neurons is unstable, and exist only a short period of time. The same is about words: they exist during our pronunciation or thinking (i.e. the inner pronunciation) of them. We just repeat series of vowels in a head, which have curved wave nature, and the neurons accept relevant position inside our heads. Their behaviour is repeating the waves in a way. Any neurons configurations rush on a surface as well as symbols, numbers or names flow over our heads as words or thoughts.
I see 'neuroscience' as being little more than a modern version of alchemy. I tried taking a variety of neurotransmitter simulators, and 're-uptake inhibitors', and they worked nothing at all like the text books say they do.
(Kinda pointless trying to discuss neuroscience if you never took the drugs they claim to have isolated).
Now of course words and mind interact with the body somehow, some way. But since the age of Socrates, there has been zero formal advancement on the topic in the ranks of those that call themselves 'the scientists' (neo-sophists, really).
I suggest reading Rupert Sheldrake, who in "The science delusion", shows ample evidence that the brain does nothing more than cool the blood, whilst the 'seat of awareness' is located at the spine. (Or central nervous system).
We just anthropomorphize and project our position as the brain for the simple
reason that it is situated between the ears and eyes.
Just like soulless spiteful people (like those that pretend to be psychologists around here) project their nihilist inferiority complex onto the universe around them, thinking themselves as a 'parent' who needs to rebuke, scold and demean his/her 'children' by belittling them and abusing them.
Of course that person is just telling us how it was raised to be how they are.
Well, I don't know that for very well whether or not there are neuro logic or something, but there are neuro capillars in our body, and for certain there are some connection between a spinal cord, a brain, and those nerveous system. And of course somehow the electrical signals respond to actions and vice versa. Speaking honestly, I'm not a fan of psychoanalysis. I don't like Freud. For me he was as Einstein for you - sharlatan. I'd say that the psychoanalysis might have been a tale behind some events. For instance, all those dream interpretations are nothing to do with science. But I cannot deny the profit that might have been gotten by using such a technique. In China there are no medicine as for many other countries, and they use quite a medicine technique with needles called 'acupuncture', which is believed by Chinese can help them to cure something. I doubt that such needle pricking can cure, but I can agree it can help: when a person is injured, the shock he's feeling saves him from the extreme pain. |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Nov 18, 2022 14:15:32 GMT
I see 'neuroscience' as being little more than a modern version of alchemy. I tried taking a variety of neurotransmitter simulators, and 're-uptake inhibitors', and they worked nothing at all like the text books say they do.
(Kinda pointless trying to discuss neuroscience if you never took the drugs they claim to have isolated).
Now of course words and mind interact with the body somehow, some way. But since the age of Socrates, there has been zero formal advancement on the topic in the ranks of those that call themselves 'the scientists' (neo-sophists, really).
I suggest reading Rupert Sheldrake, who in "The science delusion", shows ample evidence that the brain does nothing more than cool the blood, whilst the 'seat of awareness' is located at the spine. (Or central nervous system).
We just anthropomorphize and project our position as the brain for the simple
reason that it is situated between the ears and eyes.
Just like soulless spiteful people (like those that pretend to be psychologists around here) project their nihilist inferiority complex onto the universe around them, thinking themselves as a 'parent' who needs to rebuke, scold and demean his/her 'children' by belittling them and abusing them.
Of course that person is just telling us how it was raised to be how they are.
Well, I don't know that for very well whether or not there are neuro logic or something, but there are neuro capillars in our body, and for certain there are some connection between a spinal cord, a brain, and those nerveous system. And of course somehow the electrical signals respond to actions and vice versa. Speaking honestly, I'm not a fan of psychoanalysis. I don't like Freud. For me he was as Einstein for you - sharlatan. I'd say that the psychoanalysis might have been a tale behind some events. For instance, all those dream interpretations are nothing to do with science. But I cannot deny the profit that might have been gotten by using such a technique. In China there are no medicine as for many other countries, and they use quite a medicine technique with needles called 'acupuncture', which is believed by Chinese can help them to cure something. I doubt that such needle pricking can cure, but I can agree it can help: when a person is injured, the shock he's feeling saves him from the extreme pain.
Freud only makes sense in the context of Jung. Freud perfectly describes the psycho-physical aspects of the mind, but he never goes further than that.
In Vedic terms, Freud is fixated on the 2nd chakra. But his methods work extremely well in those situations. The problem is that when the west removed the Freudian analysis, they were left with a psycho- void.
And we can see the disastrous results in the alphabet people as a consequence.
-----------------------
Electrical signals are only a part of the psycho-physical body, and its a similar mistake to reduce the body to an electro-chemical process. Electricity does not cause wounds to heal. Which they always do if you eat healthy living food. And they don't if you eat dead chemicalized processed food.
Acupuncture could have psychological value to those that are feeling
physically numb to reality; but I prefer the more natural method of letting my cat shred my arm to a bloody pulp in a 'play'-fight.
Or dodging a good solid thump from a cricket ball.
|
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Nov 23, 2022 5:35:01 GMT
We may say that complex numbers belongs to a set of irrational numbers, and integers is a subset of real numbers. We may say that Nathan is just four symbols 'n', 'a', 't', and 'h', or to say that it is a part of a name Jonathan. The desk may be interpreted as a table with shelves, and a baseball bat as a wooden stick with a handle and a trunk with a certain form. Each of description or determination - is just a new set of words. Indeed, all what we are doing in such cases are just using new words. Similar way symbols, numbers, and names exist. We can't find the reality with their presence, but we may speak about them. This is very interesting point of presence of those deities comparing to the existence of surface structure of neurons. Each configuration of neurons is unstable, and exist only a short period of time. The same is about words: they exist during our pronunciation or thinking (i.e. the inner pronunciation) of them. We just repeat series of vowels in a head, which have curved wave nature, and the neurons accept relevant position inside our heads. Their behaviour is repeating the waves in a way. Any neurons configurations rush on a surface as well as symbols, numbers or names flow over our heads as words or thoughts.
I see 'neuroscience' as being little more than a modern version of alchemy. I tried taking a variety of neurotransmitter simulators, and 're-uptake inhibitors', and they worked nothing at all like the text books say they do.
(Kinda pointless trying to discuss neuroscience if you never took the drugs they claim to have isolated).
Now of course words and mind interact with the body somehow, some way. But since the age of Socrates, there has been zero formal advancement on the topic in the ranks of those that call themselves 'the scientists' (neo-sophists, really).
I suggest reading Rupert Sheldrake, who in "The science delusion", shows ample evidence that the brain does nothing more than cool the blood, whilst the 'seat of awareness' is located at the spine. (Or central nervous system).
We just anthropomorphize and project our position as the brain for the simple
reason that it is situated between the ears and eyes.
Just like soulless spiteful people (like those that pretend to be psychologists around here) project their nihilist inferiority complex onto the universe around them, thinking themselves as a 'parent' who needs to rebuke, scold and demean his/her 'children' by belittling them and abusing them.
Of course that person is just telling us how it was raised to be how they are.
Still trying to find opportunities to try and smear my name when no one asked you to? At least be a man and directly message me and talk to me like a man if you have a problem with me, other then that I don't want this forum becoming nothing but bitching because that defeats the entire purpose of the forum. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 23, 2022 9:06:12 GMT
Well, I don't know that for very well whether or not there are neuro logic or something, but there are neuro capillars in our body, and for certain there are some connection between a spinal cord, a brain, and those nerveous system. And of course somehow the electrical signals respond to actions and vice versa. Speaking honestly, I'm not a fan of psychoanalysis. I don't like Freud. For me he was as Einstein for you - sharlatan. I'd say that the psychoanalysis might have been a tale behind some events. For instance, all those dream interpretations are nothing to do with science. But I cannot deny the profit that might have been gotten by using such a technique. In China there are no medicine as for many other countries, and they use quite a medicine technique with needles called 'acupuncture', which is believed by Chinese can help them to cure something. I doubt that such needle pricking can cure, but I can agree it can help: when a person is injured, the shock he's feeling saves him from the extreme pain.
Freud only makes sense in the context of Jung. Freud perfectly describes the psycho-physical aspects of the mind, but he never goes further than that.
In Vedic terms, Freud is fixated on the 2nd chakra. But his methods work extremely well in those situations. The problem is that when the west removed the Freudian analysis, they were left with a psycho- void.
And we can see the disastrous results in the alphabet people as a consequence.
-----------------------
Electrical signals are only a part of the psycho-physical body, and its a similar mistake to reduce the body to an electro-chemical process. Electricity does not cause wounds to heal. Which they always do if you eat healthy living food. And they don't if you eat dead chemicalized processed food.
Acupuncture could have psychological value to those that are feeling
physically numb to reality; but I prefer the more natural method of letting my cat shred my arm to a bloody pulp in a 'play'-fight.
Or dodging a good solid thump from a cricket ball.
Well, all what I can say that it's true good warn not to reduce a human to electric signal, otherwise we risk to repeat series of mistakes of past naturephilosophers. But I never like Freud, nor what he had been doing. It is easy to manipulate the results of him. Also, he must have been blamed for what he said about sexualization of children. His 'analysis' later turned into reduction of a person to instincts. I think the strategy of such can be one of the reasons of ruining humans intentions from more light and wisheful (like the Romanticism had) into deviant and different perverted model. No matter what, it's better to avoid cats' scratches. The can could injure you badly. But I agree that in most cases it's okay. Often when I play with kittens (when I had them) they used to scratch my hands. |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Nov 24, 2022 16:03:49 GMT
Freud only makes sense in the context of Jung. Freud perfectly describes the psycho-physical aspects of the mind, but he never goes further than that.
In Vedic terms, Freud is fixated on the 2nd chakra. But his methods work extremely well in those situations. The problem is that when the west removed the Freudian analysis, they were left with a psycho- void.
And we can see the disastrous results in the alphabet people as a consequence.
-----------------------
Electrical signals are only a part of the psycho-physical body, and its a similar mistake to reduce the body to an electro-chemical process. Electricity does not cause wounds to heal. Which they always do if you eat healthy living food. And they don't if you eat dead chemicalized processed food.
Acupuncture could have psychological value to those that are feeling
physically numb to reality; but I prefer the more natural method of letting my cat shred my arm to a bloody pulp in a 'play'-fight.
Or dodging a good solid thump from a cricket ball.
Well, all what I can say that it's true good warn not to reduce a human to electric signal, otherwise we risk to repeat series of mistakes of past naturephilosophers. But I never like Freud, nor what he had been doing. It is easy to manipulate the results of him. Also, he must have been blamed for what he said about sexualization of children. His 'analysis' later turned into reduction of a person to instincts. I think the strategy of such can be one of the reasons of ruining humans intentions from more light and wisheful (like the Romanticism had) into deviant and different perverted model. No matter what, it's better to avoid cats' scratches. The can could injure you badly. But I agree that in most cases it's okay. Often when I play with kittens (when I had them) they used to scratch my hands.
One must also be careful of which is the proper documents, and which are not, there was no insinuation of the deliberate sexualization of children nor anyone else for that matter, in a genuine Freudian analysis.
That all creatures have such instincts is just a fact, and Freud clearly shows that people have a 'super-ego' when properly socialized, that is above and controls the base instincts of the 'Id'.
And it is only in terrible traumatic situations that the super-ego dies
but its not replaced by a better super-ego. This is called ego-death, and is a termed a 'nervous breakdown' when not sutured correctly. And it properly describes how psycho- disorders and their like are typically the consequence of repeated trauma over generations, like warfare or other trauma, such as terrible living conditions like poverty, over-population - which stems from illiteracy.
There are also often 'pop-songs' and pop-culture that misrepresented Freud, like Jim Morrison's warped interpretation - it has NOTHING to do with the textbook reality.
Tho, I do like most of Jim's music much.
As for kittens, and even wildcats, their scratches are harmless I have a million scars.
Cats are cleaner than people really.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 24, 2022 17:01:09 GMT
Well, all what I can say that it's true good warn not to reduce a human to electric signal, otherwise we risk to repeat series of mistakes of past naturephilosophers. But I never like Freud, nor what he had been doing. It is easy to manipulate the results of him. Also, he must have been blamed for what he said about sexualization of children. His 'analysis' later turned into reduction of a person to instincts. I think the strategy of such can be one of the reasons of ruining humans intentions from more light and wisheful (like the Romanticism had) into deviant and different perverted model. No matter what, it's better to avoid cats' scratches. The can could injure you badly. But I agree that in most cases it's okay. Often when I play with kittens (when I had them) they used to scratch my hands.
One must also be careful of which is the proper documents, and which are not, there was no insinuation of the deliberate sexualization of children nor anyone else for that matter, in a genuine Freudian analysis.
That all creatures have such instincts is just a fact, and Freud clearly shows that people have a 'super-ego' when properly socialized, that is above and controls the base instincts of the 'Id'.
And it is only in terrible traumatic situations that the super-ego dies
but its not replaced by a better super-ego. This is called ego-death, and is a termed a 'nervous breakdown' when not sutured correctly. And it properly describes how psycho- disorders and their like are typically the consequence of repeated trauma over generations, like warfare or other trauma, such as terrible living conditions like poverty, over-population - which stems from illiteracy.
There are also often 'pop-songs' and pop-culture that misrepresented Freud, like Jim Morrison's warped interpretation - it has NOTHING to do with the textbook reality.
Tho, I do like most of Jim's music much.
As for kittens, and even wildcats, their scratches are harmless I have a million scars.
Cats are cleaner than people really.
Can't say I accept those concepts as ego-super-ego-id. No, such a reduction is too plain. Maybe it's not a bad model. I read Freud, at least his most featured works. In many places he usually says that "it might be", "perhaps", "it's plausible", "not impossible", etc. And it seems he refuses to insist, but rather he just proposes a new method. Anyway, can't say I like this way of him. It may be working for some clinical cases as for that boy seeing a bird, so for women with hysteria, while for me it looks like one of successful ways. However, the success can be reached in many ways; if I win the race A, doesn't mean I couldn't win the race B. Besides, seems like Freud wanted us to be as close as possible to corners of the interpretation. I'm not a fan of that. What "sex" is? What "love" is? No, it's not good. If I were him I would propose to use some kind of a functional scheme. For instance, if there's a person with some psychological problems he's better be analysed via his behavior. We want to find how the person acts and what are the obstacles for him to act like A, not like B, etc. Actually we may skip any Freudian interpretations at all, relying on behavior only as it's been done in many articles of Skinner. And Skinner, for my opinion was much more closer to propose a cure for patients. |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Nov 27, 2022 6:56:27 GMT
Eugene 2.0Whenever we use the term 'subconscious', we acknowledge probably the greatest discovery of what a person is since the vikings figured out how to make a boat float in the high seas. That is not to say I agree with every aspect of Freud. But he identifies these structures of the mind: The hierarchy of Superego, Ego, and Id have absolute ontological reality, and the subconscious is likely the most real aspect of mind ever identified. And yet, nowhere can these structures be found in the 'brain'. In fact nothing of brain-theory comes close to Freud's structural ontology. But Freud claims to be a materialist, and yet his metaphysics, is not material! Its about identifying his discovery, for what it is, BUT many have said his ideas were not originally his, but come from the Vedic traditions. But either way you cannot understand the mind without the 'subconscious'. And that comes to us from the Freudian tradition. Much of slander and even outright deliberate misquotes against Freud comes from the homo-unmentionable parts of society. And now as a consequence s-e-x-u-a-l problems are on the increase. So if you want to remove Freud, you will leave a void, and that will be filled by all these alphabet people trying to corrupt the minds of children. They even teach queer in schools these days. Now that Freud is gone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 27, 2022 9:10:19 GMT
Eugene 2.0Whenever we use the term 'subconscious', we acknowledge probably the greatest discovery of what a person is since the vikings figured out how to make a boat float in the high seas. That is not to say I agree with every aspect of Freud. But he identifies these structures of the mind: The hierarchy of Superego, Ego, and Id have absolute ontological reality, and the subconscious is likely the most real aspect of mind ever identified. And yet, nowhere can these structures be found in the 'brain'. In fact nothing of brain-theory comes close to Freud's structural ontology. But Freud claims to be a materialist, and yet his metaphysics, is not material! Its about identifying his discovery, for what it is, BUT many have said his ideas were not originally his, but come from the Vedic traditions. But either way you cannot understand the mind without the 'subconscious'. And that comes to us from the Freudian tradition. Much of slander and even outright deliberate misquotes against Freud comes from the homo-unmentionable parts of society. And now as a consequence s-e-x-u-a-l problems are on the increase. So if you want to remove Freud, you will leave a void, and that will be filled by all these alphabet people trying to corrupt the minds of children. They even teach queer in schools these days. Now that Freud is gone. You know, I think you are right. Yes. I remember when I was visiting lectures in a local university, the primary context was taken not from Freud directly. Moreover, there were followers of Freud as one woman from the Great Britain (at the moment I can't remember her name; so I will as soon as the spots of my mind pass away) who didn't take that point at such a point. And yes, Freud himself didn't seem to be satisfied about all those weird education. He'd rather try to point by this to some other things. Anyway, the one thing I agree the most is that the follower of Freud as well as popular views of his theory became the central reason to twist all the good points of him. Also, Freud was a pioneer in an aspect of researching of subconsciousness as you truly remarked. Such philosophers as Slavoi Zizek and his teacher Jean Lacan twisted Freud much more, than Freud told by himself. Those ones just applied Freud whenever they like to. So, I would like to read Alasder McIntire or some other analytic philosophers who, instead of make broader Freud's metaphysical aspect (here I also agree with you about this aspect of the psychologist), wanted to analyze the methods and the notions of him, proposing an apparatus of kinda logic of Freud. It's bad I don't remember the names of many of those analytic philosophers, but I do remember that my lecturer of philosophical psychology proposed me to read some of those articles (he knew I was a fan of reading analytic philosophy). And that was a text, but again - I can't remember the namme of the author - who investigatade the notion of 'subconsciousness' on a level of logic... Hell, I must do something with my head to avoid further memory spots. I even remember the name of article (I read it in Russian; it was put into one of Russian philosophy gathering journals): "Of Freud's Subcosciousness'. The author lived in 60-70's. Anyway, I think sometimes it is very fruitful to reread Freud, and to start working on own's psychology. Personally, I guess I always got problems with psychology, because I almost never was good at analyzing people. Even in childhood I play with tractors, building techniques, electronics. Later I lost the interest to develop any of such intentions, but there's a remarkable case my parents told me, it was about visiting a local zoo when I was 3 or 4. Instead of watching animals, birds, etc, in the zoo there were some excavators, and all the visit my parents had to spend with me near the techniques; seemed I hadn't a tiny interest in any the zoo's inhabitats, but was impressed by tractors and excavators. |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Nov 27, 2022 18:15:57 GMT
Eugene 2.0For every great philosopher, or great idea, there will be countless variations which distort it to the point of injustice. Most of what I studied as developmental psychology has that strong Freudian sub-text, but its authors were numerous and no attempt was really made to give credit to one person rather than another. But its vital to comprehend that war is a phallic act committed for the most part by men, at the encouragement of women, as a means to be rid of them. Understanding the phases of development helps also to deal with such miscreants in the world too.
|
|
