|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 14, 2022 13:36:07 GMT
Firstly unknown, then if to know it - it is known, and if it is known about the unknown it is known about it. So, at least we know that what we known is the unknown, and that the knowledge of ours is about not known, but the unknown. If we add to this something that is the knowledge of our knowledge of the unknown, so there are no addition, then all what we known is about unknown.
But the unknown is some kind of knowledge nevertheless. And if the unknown is the only knowledge of ours, then we are aware of it, and can go further, don't bothering about that this knowledge is about the unknown. As such a knowledge is not the unknown, but the known, and as a known it is some kind of knowledge, so it's known that this knowledge is about some kind of knowledge which is known as the unknown.
And that unknown as known to us is knowledge, and this knowledge turns to the known for us. Being known we control it like what we do know, and since that that controlled known knowledge of the unknown is not the unknown at a whole. So, at least some parts of it are known to us. Therefore, the unknown isn't the unknown completely, but only partially. As some parts of the unknown are not unknown to us, we know about the unknown not knowing what it is.
|
|