|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 24, 2022 21:45:02 GMT
1. Reality makes no sense, it is absent of sense.
2. As absent of sense reality has a negative boundary which defines it.
3. This negative boundary makes sense as it is a boundary.
4. Reality making no sense makes sense.
1. Reality makes sense, it is sensical.
2. As sensical reality has a positive boundary which defines it.
3. This positive boundary does not make sense as it is a boundary (ie how do you define a boundary?).
4. Reality making sense makes no sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 25, 2022 1:24:11 GMT
Reality Not Making Sense Does Not Make It Sensible Because Of A "Boundary", Nor Does Reality Making Sense Make It Senseless Because Of Said "Boundary".
There Is No "Boundary", You Are Making Up Ghost Variables To Fit Your Circulatory Thought Into A Square Hole.
Never Will I See Reality As Senseless, It's Sensible, It Has Senses, It Has Neurons And The Universe Is A Giant Brain That Creates Everything In Its Image Neurologically, Hence Plants And Nerves Are Mirrored, And Plants / Humans Have Opposite Chemical Balances.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 26, 2022 21:01:30 GMT
Reality Not Making Sense Does Not Make It Sensible Because Of A "Boundary", Nor Does Reality Making Sense Make It Senseless Because Of Said "Boundary".
There Is No "Boundary", You Are Making Up Ghost Variables To Fit Your Circulatory Thought Into A Square Hole.
Never Will I See Reality As Senseless, It's Sensible, It Has Senses, It Has Neurons And The Universe Is A Giant Brain That Creates Everything In Its Image Neurologically, Hence Plants And Nerves Are Mirrored, And Plants / Humans Have Opposite Chemical Balances. We senses boundaries. But in trying to sense further what a boundary is we are left with further boundaries and the boundary loses its sensibility as it becomes self-referential and without comparison. If the universe is all that there is, and it is self-referential, then the universe has no form as no comparison exists. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 26, 2022 23:30:30 GMT
Reality Not Making Sense Does Not Make It Sensible Because Of A "Boundary", Nor Does Reality Making Sense Make It Senseless Because Of Said "Boundary".
There Is No "Boundary", You Are Making Up Ghost Variables To Fit Your Circulatory Thought Into A Square Hole.
Never Will I See Reality As Senseless, It's Sensible, It Has Senses, It Has Neurons And The Universe Is A Giant Brain That Creates Everything In Its Image Neurologically, Hence Plants And Nerves Are Mirrored, And Plants / Humans Have Opposite Chemical Balances. We senses boundaries. But in trying to sense further what a boundary is we are left with further boundaries and the boundary loses its sensibility as it becomes self-referential and without comparison. If the universe is all that there is, and it is self-referential, then the universe has no form as no comparison exists. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 20:28:33 GMT
We senses boundaries. But in trying to sense further what a boundary is we are left with further boundaries and the boundary loses its sensibility as it becomes self-referential and without comparison. If the universe is all that there is, and it is self-referential, then the universe has no form as no comparison exists. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 20:47:24 GMT
The Simple Ability To Think Of The Word "Boundary" And Its Implications On Reality Proves Your Circulatory Statements Are False. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 20:53:45 GMT
"But in trying to sense further what a boundary is we are left with further boundaries and the boundary loses its sensibility as it becomes self-referential and without comparison." If boundary is an illusion which can be surpassed then to surpass boundaries: 1. Is to result in another boundary thus the nature of boundary is not surpassed. 2. Is to move beyond boundaries thus resulting in no-thingness. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 21:02:39 GMT
Only If You Are Smaller In Capacity, Otherwise "Boundary" Is A Make-Shift Illusion Based On Relative Limits That Can Be Surpassed With A Sharp Mind. If boundary is an illusion which can be surpassed then to surpass boundaries: 1. Is to result in another boundary thus the nature of boundary is not surpassed. 2. Is to move beyond boundaries thus resulting in no-thingness. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 21:07:09 GMT
If boundary is an illusion which can be surpassed then to surpass boundaries: 1. Is to result in another boundary thus the nature of boundary is not surpassed. 2. Is to move beyond boundaries thus resulting in no-thingness. If boundaries are an illusion then there is no form to the universe as boundaries are necessary for form. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 21:15:18 GMT
Or 3. Humans Are Purposely Limited To Gain Experience And Evolve To Have The Privilege To Experience A Realm Without Boundaries, Because Truly Boundaries Are An Illusion, As We Are Always Connected To The Source, We Are Always Connected To The Core Of The Creator At Every Given Time As Long As We Retain That Acknowledgement. If boundaries are an illusion then there is no form to the universe as boundaries are necessary for form. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 21:39:58 GMT
If boundaries are an illusion then there is no form to the universe as boundaries are necessary for form. An infinite line is a boundary. A cup is a form. All forms originated from void as the void of void. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 23:20:14 GMT
No, Form Can Exist Without Boundaries. Water Can Take Form Of A Cup While In A Cup, But The Cup Was Formed By Formlessness Which Governs Water. An infinite line is a boundary. A cup is a form. All forms originated from void as the void of void. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 3, 2022 21:48:42 GMT
An infinite line is a boundary. A cup is a form. All forms originated from void as the void of void. The void of void, ie the absence of absence, is being as form, ie a positive. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Nov 4, 2022 1:04:02 GMT
When You Say "From Void As The Void Of Void" It Just Proves You Don't Know What You Are Talking About And Grasping For Extra Sounds To Sound Philosophically More In-Depth, When You Are A Paper-Weight Philosopher That Makes Up "Boundaries" To Exploit People's Ignorance On A Subject Just To Purport Nonsensical Ideas That Contradict Each Other More Than Not. The void of void, ie the absence of absence, is being as form, ie a positive. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 8, 2022 17:16:38 GMT
Oh, it's a stylish post. There was a philosopher skeptic Carneades who was invited to Rome to read some lectures. He came one day and told that 'being good is good', and the next day he came and told another lecture that 'being good is bad'. The most interesting is that: the truth was not uttered, the truth was revealed by him. The same is here: just come and see.
|
|
