|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 21:30:56 GMT
Formlessness is one (as there is no comparison for form) yet as only one is without comparison, necessary for form, thus is zero.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 21:11:28 GMT
You're Missing The Point, Fire And Water Are Contradicting Opposites, That Does NOT Make Them A Paradox. There unification is the paradox of steam. You
Don't
Know
What
A
Paradox
Is
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 21:13:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 21:25:55 GMT
The Wording Is Not Correct, Whoever Wrote That Definition Did Not Think It Through. Fire / Water Are Not A Paradox, Just Because You Read A Definition On The Internet That Also Doesn't Understand How To Describe A Real Paradox.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 21:47:30 GMT
The Wording Is Not Correct, Whoever Wrote That Definition Did Not Think It Through. Fire / Water Are Not A Paradox, Just Because You Read A Definition On The Internet That Also Doesn't Understand How To Describe A Real Paradox.So dictionaries do not work for you considering you create your own definitions.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 23:34:29 GMT
The Wording Is Not Correct, Whoever Wrote That Definition Did Not Think It Through. Fire / Water Are Not A Paradox, Just Because You Read A Definition On The Internet That Also Doesn't Understand How To Describe A Real Paradox.So dictionaries do not work for you considering you create your own definitions. You Lost This Debate. Your "Definition Of Paradox" Implies Anything Contradictory Is A Paradox, Which Is FALSE. Fire / Water Contradict, But Are Not Considered A Paradox, They Have Logical Functions; Paradoxes Are NOT Logical Functions.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 3, 2022 21:57:43 GMT
So dictionaries do not work for you considering you create your own definitions. You Lost This Debate. Your "Definition Of Paradox" Implies Anything Contradictory Is A Paradox, Which Is FALSE. Fire / Water Contradict, But Are Not Considered A Paradox, They Have Logical Functions; Paradoxes Are NOT Logical Functions.
If a paradox is the unifying of differences, in this case opposites, then they observe a connection. This connection is a relation and as such is logical.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Nov 4, 2022 1:13:30 GMT
You Lost This Debate. Your "Definition Of Paradox" Implies Anything Contradictory Is A Paradox, Which Is FALSE. Fire / Water Contradict, But Are Not Considered A Paradox, They Have Logical Functions; Paradoxes Are NOT Logical Functions.
If a paradox is the unifying of differences, in this case opposites, then they observe a connection. This connection is a relation and as such is logical. You Do Not Know What "Paradox" Means. That Is Not A "Paradox", A "Paradox" Would Be "After Dark" "Before Dark" Despite There Being A Day "Before" And "After" In A Dichotomy To "After" And "Before" Regarding Dark.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 10, 2022 21:53:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Nov 11, 2022 20:56:46 GMT
Wrong. If That Was True, Fire And Water Would Be Universally Considered A Paradox, Yet It's Not. Only You Do Because You Read A Definition On The Internet And Haven't Realized It's Wrong, Not All Contradictions Are Paradoxes.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 16, 2022 21:28:52 GMT
Wrong. If That Was True, Fire And Water Would Be Universally Considered A Paradox, Yet It's Not. Only You Do Because You Read A Definition On The Internet And Haven't Realized It's Wrong, Not All Contradictions Are Paradoxes. I said a unified contradiction is a paradox not that all contradictions are paradoxes.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Nov 17, 2022 2:14:25 GMT
Wrong. If That Was True, Fire And Water Would Be Universally Considered A Paradox, Yet It's Not. Only You Do Because You Read A Definition On The Internet And Haven't Realized It's Wrong, Not All Contradictions Are Paradoxes. I said a unified contradiction is a paradox not that all contradictions are paradoxes. You Missed The Point That You're The Only One On Earth Calling Fire / Water Making Steam Babies A Paradox, Nobody Agrees. Just You And A Misinterpreted Definition For Paradox Thinks This Ludicrous Statement Is Real.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 17, 2022 22:14:41 GMT
I said a unified contradiction is a paradox not that all contradictions are paradoxes. You Missed The Point That You're The Only One On Earth Calling Fire / Water Making Steam Babies A Paradox, Nobody Agrees. Just You And A Misinterpreted Definition For Paradox Thinks This Ludicrous Statement Is Real.If agreement is necessary for truth then much of what you say is false.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Nov 17, 2022 23:32:10 GMT
You Missed The Point That You're The Only One On Earth Calling Fire / Water Making Steam Babies A Paradox, Nobody Agrees. Just You And A Misinterpreted Definition For Paradox Thinks This Ludicrous Statement Is Real. If agreement is necessary for truth then much of what you say is false. Your Quick Need To Jump An Argument With Logical Fallacies Such As "Agreement Is Necessary For Truth" Is A Declaration Of Your Absurdity. ... Agreement And Truth Clearly Don't Matter, Considering An Entire Crowd Can Be Lead By A Lie Despite Agreement, However, The ENTIRE Planet Doesn't Agree Fire / Water Making Steam Is A Paradox, So You Are Clearly Wrong.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 17, 2022 23:53:33 GMT
If agreement is necessary for truth then much of what you say is false. Your Quick Need To Jump An Argument With Logical Fallacies Such As "Agreement Is Necessary For Truth" Is A Declaration Of Your Absurdity. ... Agreement And Truth Clearly Don't Matter, Considering An Entire Crowd Can Be Lead By A Lie Despite Agreement, However, The ENTIRE Planet Doesn't Agree Fire / Water Making Steam Is A Paradox, So You Are Clearly Wrong.Not the "entire planet" if I am making a case for it.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Nov 18, 2022 0:34:50 GMT
Your Quick Need To Jump An Argument With Logical Fallacies Such As "Agreement Is Necessary For Truth" Is A Declaration Of Your Absurdity. ... Agreement And Truth Clearly Don't Matter, Considering An Entire Crowd Can Be Lead By A Lie Despite Agreement, However, The ENTIRE Planet Doesn't Agree Fire / Water Making Steam Is A Paradox, So You Are Clearly Wrong. Not the "entire planet" if I am making a case for it. You're Not, If Fire And Water Making Steam Was Ever A Paradox, Everyone Before You Would Have Made Such An Easy Claim If It Was True -- They Didn't, Because You And That Stupid Definition Of "Paradox" Are Wrong. Fire + Water = Steam Is Logical.
|
|