|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 21:30:56 GMT
Formlessness is one (as there is no comparison for form) yet as only one is without comparison, necessary for form, thus is zero.
|
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Oct 16, 2022 16:57:48 GMT
Do you try to think of ways to sound like someone that makes fun of philosophy? Or does it come naturally to you?
|
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 16, 2022 17:34:51 GMT
Formlessness is one (as there is no comparison for form) yet as only one is without comparison, necessary for form, thus is zero.  |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 17, 2022 20:44:42 GMT
Formlessness is one (as there is no comparison for form) yet as only one is without comparison, necessary for form, thus is zero. Not addressing the argument: There is only the one. The one has no comparison otherewise it would not be the one as something would be beyond it, thus resulting in the many. Because the one has no comparison, necessary for form, it is nothing. Now as to why you are not addressing my argument: 1. The penis is relative to the vagina and vice-versa, the one is not relative to anything otherwise it would not be the one (it would be the many). 2. Dually the unity of the penis/vagina results in the baby. The unity of 1 and 0 is reality. The unity of a contradiction is a paradox: "a situation, person, or thing that combines contradictory features or qualities." www.google.com/search?q=paradox+definition&source=hp&ei=7L9NY-vpIKqF0PEPts-FsAk&iflsig=AJiK0e8AAAAAY03N_I8P5JFm6tPOkfZ7Fi_rGzdp43tl&ved=0ahUKEwjrj5zukej6AhWqAjQIHbZnAZYQ4dUDCAo&uact=5&oq=paradox+definition&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyCAgAEIAEELEDMgsIABCABBCxAxCDATIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEOgsILhCABBCxAxCDAToICC4QsQMQgwE6EQguEIAEELEDEIMBEMcBENEDOg4ILhCABBCxAxCDARDUAjoUCC4QgAQQsQMQgwEQxwEQ0QMQ1AI6DgguEIAEEMcBEK8BENQCOggIABCxAxCDAToLCAAQgAQQsQMQyQM6BQguEIAEOgcIABCABBADOgsILhCABBDHARCvAToLCC4QgAQQsQMQ1AI6BwgAEIAEEAo6CAguEIAEELEDOgsILhCABBDHARDRA1AAWLoSYIoUaABwAHgAgAGXAYgBkw2SAQQxMi42mAEAoAEB&sclient=gws-wiz |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 17, 2022 20:46:14 GMT
Do you try to think of ways to sound like someone that makes bun of philosophy? Or does it come naturally to you? "Bun" or "fun"? If you mean "fun" then in some respects "yes" to both. I am pointing out how absurd it is. But this absurdity goes beyond philosophy. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 17, 2022 22:26:21 GMT
According To My Calculations, If 1 Is A Penis And 0 Is A Vagina, That Makes A Baby, 1 And 0 Are Not A Paradox, But A Logical Function Not addressing the argument: There is only the one. The one has no comparison otherewise it would not be the one as something would be beyond it, thus resulting in the many. Because the one has no comparison, necessary for form, it is nothing. Now as to why you are not addressing my argument: 1. The penis is relative to the vagina and vice-versa, the one is not relative to anything otherwise it would not be the one (it would be the many). 2. Dually the unity of the penis/vagina results in the baby. The unity of 1 and 0 is reality. The unity of a contradiction is a paradox: "a situation, person, or thing that combines contradictory features or qualities." www.google.com/search?q=paradox+definition&source=hp&ei=7L9NY-vpIKqF0PEPts-FsAk&iflsig=AJiK0e8AAAAAY03N_I8P5JFm6tPOkfZ7Fi_rGzdp43tl&ved=0ahUKEwjrj5zukej6AhWqAjQIHbZnAZYQ4dUDCAo&uact=5&oq=paradox+definition&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyCAgAEIAEELEDMgsIABCABBCxAxCDATIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEOgsILhCABBCxAxCDAToICC4QsQMQgwE6EQguEIAEELEDEIMBEMcBENEDOg4ILhCABBCxAxCDARDUAjoUCC4QgAQQsQMQgwEQxwEQ0QMQ1AI6DgguEIAEEMcBEK8BENQCOggIABCxAxCDAToLCAAQgAQQsQMQyQM6BQguEIAEOgcIABCABBADOgsILhCABBDHARCvAToLCC4QgAQQsQMQ1AI6BwgAEIAEEAo6CAguEIAEELEDOgsILhCABBDHARDRA1AAWLoSYIoUaABwAHgAgAGXAYgBkw2SAQQxMi42mAEAoAEB&sclient=gws-wiz
You Were Made By Your Dad And Mom, That Is The Non-Fallacious Function Of "1" And "0"; The Value Of "1" And "0" Is Not Lost In Further Layers Of Creation Just Because YOU Want To Spread Your Circulatory Cult Ideas That Have No Ground-Breaking Conclusion. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 24, 2022 19:56:49 GMT
There Is No Argument To Address, You Don't Get To Dress Up An Absence Of Rebuttal Into A House-Of-Cards Argument.
You Were Made By Your Dad And Mom, That Is The Non-Fallacious Function Of "1" And "0"; The Value Of "1" And "0" Is Not Lost In Further Layers Of Creation Just Because YOU Want To Spread Your Circulatory Cult Ideas That Have No Ground-Breaking Conclusion. Through the act of sex the male is the female and vice versa, their absence of separation is what enables the child to exist. A reality without comparison is 1 given it is the only reality, in a seperate respect it is 0 given it has no comparison for it to have form. Reality is both 1 and 0. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 25, 2022 1:17:19 GMT
There Is No Argument To Address, You Don't Get To Dress Up An Absence Of Rebuttal Into A House-Of-Cards Argument.
You Were Made By Your Dad And Mom, That Is The Non-Fallacious Function Of "1" And "0"; The Value Of "1" And "0" Is Not Lost In Further Layers Of Creation Just Because YOU Want To Spread Your Circulatory Cult Ideas That Have No Ground-Breaking Conclusion. Through the act of sex the male is the female and vice versa, their absence of separation is what enables the child to exist. A reality without comparison is 1 given it is the only reality, in a seperate respect it is 0 given it has no comparison for it to have form. Reality is both 1 and 0. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 26, 2022 20:59:23 GMT
Through the act of sex the male is the female and vice versa, their absence of separation is what enables the child to exist. A reality without comparison is 1 given it is the only reality, in a seperate respect it is 0 given it has no comparison for it to have form. Reality is both 1 and 0. They are opposites that depend on and exist through each other thus they are paradoxical. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 26, 2022 23:27:45 GMT
Then You Argued Against Your Claim, You Just Admitted That 1 And 0 Are A Function That Cannot Be A Paradox As It Has A Purpose (Child / Binary Dichotomy). They are opposites that depend on and exist through each other thus they are paradoxical. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 20:27:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 20:45:37 GMT
The Contradictory Of Fire And Water Does Not Make It A Paradox Because Fire And Water Are Opposites.
A Paradox's Contradiction Is Based On Reality-Contradiction, Not Actual Opposites, Hence + / - Magnets Are Not Defined As A Paradox.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 20:51:51 GMT
The Contradictory Of Fire And Water Does Not Make It A Paradox Because Fire And Water Are Opposites.
A Paradox's Contradiction Is Based On Reality-Contradiction, Not Actual Opposites, Hence + / - Magnets Are Not Defined As A Paradox. The unity of fire and water is steam. The unity of 1 and 0 is being. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 20:58:31 GMT
The Contradictory Of Fire And Water Does Not Make It A Paradox Because Fire And Water Are Opposites.
A Paradox's Contradiction Is Based On Reality-Contradiction, Not Actual Opposites, Hence + / - Magnets Are Not Defined As A Paradox. The unity of fire and water is steam. The unity of 1 and 0 is being. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 21:03:17 GMT
The unity of fire and water is steam. The unity of 1 and 0 is being. There unification is the paradox of steam. |
|
