Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 10, 2022 16:45:30 GMT
Usually any physical truths are helding by philosophers as possible, not necessary. For example, it's possible to imagine a world without atoms, or a world without women, or a world without straight lines. And for each concept there's an opposite. But I think it's not 100% correct about any physical truths.
An elementary piece of energy must be presented, and therefore, be true in any imaginary world. How can a world exists without anything? There would be no worlds without anything in it. Even if we imagine an empty world, it has to be different to the others by that emptiness, which is the energy.
Whatever the world is, it cannot exist without the tiniest piece of energy, and therefore one physical necessary truth exists.
An elementary piece of energy must be presented, and therefore, be true in any imaginary world. How can a world exists without anything? There would be no worlds without anything in it. Even if we imagine an empty world, it has to be different to the others by that emptiness, which is the energy.
Whatever the world is, it cannot exist without the tiniest piece of energy, and therefore one physical necessary truth exists.