|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 6, 2022 20:55:31 GMT
Falsity is an absence of truth thus an absence. As an absence it is a negative limit, ie defining something by that which it is not (the limits of a thing). As a negative limit it is a limit thus falsity inherently exists and as existing has a truth value.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 8, 2022 12:36:27 GMT
Falsity is an absence of truth thus an absence. As an absence it is a negative limit, ie defining something by that which it is not (the limits of a thing). As a negative limit it is a limit thus falsity inherently exists and as existing has a truth value. If an absence of truth isn't true, then there are no paradoxes. Given A is false for the area B, and there's no nothing, except for A, B is false, and there's no absence of truth is required for B to be false. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 20:15:03 GMT
Falsity is an absence of truth thus an absence. As an absence it is a negative limit, ie defining something by that which it is not (the limits of a thing). As a negative limit it is a limit thus falsity inherently exists and as existing has a truth value. If an absence of truth isn't true, then there are no paradoxes. Given A is false for the area B, and there's no nothing, except for A, B is false, and there's no absence of truth is required for B to be false. Absence is relative and as such all falsities contain truth value relative to another context; dually falsities exist as truth values given the falsity exists and all existence contains a truth value, paradoxically falsity is a truth. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 13, 2022 20:30:37 GMT
If an absence of truth isn't true, then there are no paradoxes. Given A is false for the area B, and there's no nothing, except for A, B is false, and there's no absence of truth is required for B to be false. Absence is relative and as such all falsities contain truth value relative to another context; dually falsities exist as truth values given the falsity exists and all existence contains a truth value, paradoxically falsity is a truth. What do you mean 'the absence is relative'? That the absence is 0, null set, or what? I don't see any paradoxes of using the truth value. How can "the existence", moreover - "the all existence" - to have that truth value? This is something metaphysical. It is not philosophical. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 20:42:28 GMT
Absence is relative and as such all falsities contain truth value relative to another context; dually falsities exist as truth values given the falsity exists and all existence contains a truth value, paradoxically falsity is a truth. What do you mean 'the absence is relative'? That the absence is 0, null set, or what? I don't see any paradoxes of using the truth value. How can "the existence", moreover - "the all existence" - to have that truth value? This is something metaphysical. It is not philosophical. Absence is relative is a thing exists in one context but not in another context, this absence of existing in another context is relative. The paradox of falsities is in the respect that they are also true when multiple contexts are applied. |
|
