Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 19, 2022 16:58:38 GMT
The Main Issue: People Expect More Than People Evidence.
People Don't Know How To Evidence.
Ever Play The Game "Among Us"? I Haven't, But Many Have, And They SUCK At Evidence.
People Are DEFECTIVE Detectives By Default.
You Show Them EVIDENCE, And They Either Say "What Evidence" Or "Looks Like Evidence".
Once In A Blue Moon Will You Have A NCIS Moment Where Someone Actually Knows What Your EVIDENCE Is And Works With You.
But 99.9999999999% Of The Time, People Aren't Choosing To Side With You By EVIDENCE, But By EMOTION And FAVORITISM.
PROOF: Name A Single Popular Person With A Large Fan Base That Wasn't Thrown Under The Bus After Committing Enough Crimes By Said Fan Base Despite All The Evidence On Them, And Compare That To An Unpopular Nobody That Is Innocent And Accused Of A Crime.
EVIDENCE NEVER MATTERED, AND THAT SHOULD BE EVIDENT.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, There Wouldn't Be LAWYERS In COURT ROOMS.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, The Rich Would NOT Have Special Privileges Over The Poor.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, Nikola Tesla Would Be The Role Model Of Intelligence, NOT Einstein.
If You Are Innocent By All Accounts, And Someone Is Popular With A Large Following Guilty Beyond Doubt, A Crowd Will Turn On You And Protect The Wolf Because They Rather Not See The Evil In Their Idol Over Defending The Innocent.
This Creates An Environment For Con-Artists To Just Pretend Someone They Are Aiding Is "Successful" And "Working Hard", By Creating Fake Credentials And Paying People Off To Pass An Otherwise Airhead That Only Makes True Workers Work Harder.
Then Anyone Real And Genuine That Wants To Make It To The Top Are Blocked By A Ponzi Scheme To Control Reality's Preferences And Trends That Trickles Down Into Society's Media And Entertainment, Rotting The Perception Of "Success".
This Is Why 99.99999999999% People Working In CEO Positions And Those That Hire People To Work Are Sociopaths, People That Keep Society And Economy Going Are Paid Less Than Those That Stand On Their Backs Pretending To "Work Hard".
Celebrities, Sports Players, Entertainers And Streamers Are All Paid More Than Soldiers Defending This Country And Workers Providing This Country.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, This World Would Be The Opposite Of Above.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, Restaurants Wouldn't Throw Away Food, And Governments Wouldn't Ban The Homeless.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, The Common People Would Rise Up Against The NOT So Common Wealth (Wealth By Deceit).
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, The Gap Between Rich And Poor Would Be Closed, Not Widened To The Point The Cost Of Living Is Above Working Wages On Top Of Inflation, And Rich Propaganda Convincing Parents Their Children Need To Get A House, When They Can't Even Afford An Apartment Without Co-Op.
This Brings Me To My Main Philosophical Point:
If I Work Hard On An Algorithm, And Provide Fully Functional Formulas Like My PI And Euler's Function Formula, People Look At It Like There's Nothing There And Respond Based On Ignorance, Rather Than The Intelligence To Respect Someone Else's Work.
If I Have Reasonable Consensus That A Date Is Converging By These Algorithms, And Have Strictly Objective EVIDENCE For My Suspicions And Statements, That Are Legitimate And Demonstrable, People DON'T Look At My EVIDENCE, They Look At What I Say With A STRAW And Take In 00.1% Of My Word, Then When My Word Doesn't Pass 10000000% Like They EXPECTED It, They Throw A Hissy Fit And Twist Intentions, Ignoring Any Ounce Of EXPLANATION.
Example: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Movie Was 9 1 3 In Months Days Years To 9 . 13 . 2022, Then To The "Matrix" Movie It Was 9 1 3 2022 To 9 . 13 . 2022, Keanu Reeves Birth Encodes 9 13 2022 And Is In Both Movies, Having To Do With "Aliens", I Checked For "Mars Attacks" Also 9 13 2022 To 9 . 13 . 2022 And I Checked Ronald Reagan's "Alien" Speech And It's UFO To 9 . 13 . 2022, On Top Of What Else I Found, So I Took A Chance And Warned About 9 . 13 . 2022, Even If It Was Not On This Date, The FLOODING (I Did Say 9 . 13 . 2022 Is A WATER Date) That's Unlike Any Flooding Before 9 . 13 . 2022, Began On 9 . 13 . 2022.
Even Though My FLOODING / WATER Prediction Came True, People EXPECTED "Aliens" Too, And Didn't Care About WATER / FLOODING, Even Though I Was RIGHT About It. People Are Babies That Make It Hard For Adults To Make These Faith-Based Calls Based On Meticulous Algorithmic Data Mining, While They Sit Back And Do Basic Human Things Every Day, Then Act Like They Have Any Audacity To Get Angry At Someone That EXPLAINED Everything, But People's EXPECTATIONS Get In The Way.
Then When I Continue On Putting In The Dirty Work For Free, While Still Maintaining 9 . 13 . 2022 In My Work, A Moderator Comes In And Classifies My Work As Non-Philosophical, When What I Do Is Entirely Based On My Philosophical Research On How Reality Works, To The Point I DID Get The FLOODING / WATER Part Right, This Only Means The "Alien" Part Is Next (I Showed You The Shadow Over Earth And UFO-Shaped Phenomenon, All Being Current).
People Don't Know How To Evidence.
Ever Play The Game "Among Us"? I Haven't, But Many Have, And They SUCK At Evidence.
People Are DEFECTIVE Detectives By Default.
You Show Them EVIDENCE, And They Either Say "What Evidence" Or "Looks Like Evidence".
Once In A Blue Moon Will You Have A NCIS Moment Where Someone Actually Knows What Your EVIDENCE Is And Works With You.
But 99.9999999999% Of The Time, People Aren't Choosing To Side With You By EVIDENCE, But By EMOTION And FAVORITISM.
PROOF: Name A Single Popular Person With A Large Fan Base That Wasn't Thrown Under The Bus After Committing Enough Crimes By Said Fan Base Despite All The Evidence On Them, And Compare That To An Unpopular Nobody That Is Innocent And Accused Of A Crime.
EVIDENCE NEVER MATTERED, AND THAT SHOULD BE EVIDENT.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, There Wouldn't Be LAWYERS In COURT ROOMS.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, The Rich Would NOT Have Special Privileges Over The Poor.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, Nikola Tesla Would Be The Role Model Of Intelligence, NOT Einstein.
If You Are Innocent By All Accounts, And Someone Is Popular With A Large Following Guilty Beyond Doubt, A Crowd Will Turn On You And Protect The Wolf Because They Rather Not See The Evil In Their Idol Over Defending The Innocent.
This Creates An Environment For Con-Artists To Just Pretend Someone They Are Aiding Is "Successful" And "Working Hard", By Creating Fake Credentials And Paying People Off To Pass An Otherwise Airhead That Only Makes True Workers Work Harder.
Then Anyone Real And Genuine That Wants To Make It To The Top Are Blocked By A Ponzi Scheme To Control Reality's Preferences And Trends That Trickles Down Into Society's Media And Entertainment, Rotting The Perception Of "Success".
This Is Why 99.99999999999% People Working In CEO Positions And Those That Hire People To Work Are Sociopaths, People That Keep Society And Economy Going Are Paid Less Than Those That Stand On Their Backs Pretending To "Work Hard".
Celebrities, Sports Players, Entertainers And Streamers Are All Paid More Than Soldiers Defending This Country And Workers Providing This Country.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, This World Would Be The Opposite Of Above.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, Restaurants Wouldn't Throw Away Food, And Governments Wouldn't Ban The Homeless.
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, The Common People Would Rise Up Against The NOT So Common Wealth (Wealth By Deceit).
IF EVIDENCE MATTERED, The Gap Between Rich And Poor Would Be Closed, Not Widened To The Point The Cost Of Living Is Above Working Wages On Top Of Inflation, And Rich Propaganda Convincing Parents Their Children Need To Get A House, When They Can't Even Afford An Apartment Without Co-Op.
This Brings Me To My Main Philosophical Point:
If I Work Hard On An Algorithm, And Provide Fully Functional Formulas Like My PI And Euler's Function Formula, People Look At It Like There's Nothing There And Respond Based On Ignorance, Rather Than The Intelligence To Respect Someone Else's Work.
If I Have Reasonable Consensus That A Date Is Converging By These Algorithms, And Have Strictly Objective EVIDENCE For My Suspicions And Statements, That Are Legitimate And Demonstrable, People DON'T Look At My EVIDENCE, They Look At What I Say With A STRAW And Take In 00.1% Of My Word, Then When My Word Doesn't Pass 10000000% Like They EXPECTED It, They Throw A Hissy Fit And Twist Intentions, Ignoring Any Ounce Of EXPLANATION.
Example: "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Movie Was 9 1 3 In Months Days Years To 9 . 13 . 2022, Then To The "Matrix" Movie It Was 9 1 3 2022 To 9 . 13 . 2022, Keanu Reeves Birth Encodes 9 13 2022 And Is In Both Movies, Having To Do With "Aliens", I Checked For "Mars Attacks" Also 9 13 2022 To 9 . 13 . 2022 And I Checked Ronald Reagan's "Alien" Speech And It's UFO To 9 . 13 . 2022, On Top Of What Else I Found, So I Took A Chance And Warned About 9 . 13 . 2022, Even If It Was Not On This Date, The FLOODING (I Did Say 9 . 13 . 2022 Is A WATER Date) That's Unlike Any Flooding Before 9 . 13 . 2022, Began On 9 . 13 . 2022.
Even Though My FLOODING / WATER Prediction Came True, People EXPECTED "Aliens" Too, And Didn't Care About WATER / FLOODING, Even Though I Was RIGHT About It. People Are Babies That Make It Hard For Adults To Make These Faith-Based Calls Based On Meticulous Algorithmic Data Mining, While They Sit Back And Do Basic Human Things Every Day, Then Act Like They Have Any Audacity To Get Angry At Someone That EXPLAINED Everything, But People's EXPECTATIONS Get In The Way.
Then When I Continue On Putting In The Dirty Work For Free, While Still Maintaining 9 . 13 . 2022 In My Work, A Moderator Comes In And Classifies My Work As Non-Philosophical, When What I Do Is Entirely Based On My Philosophical Research On How Reality Works, To The Point I DID Get The FLOODING / WATER Part Right, This Only Means The "Alien" Part Is Next (I Showed You The Shadow Over Earth And UFO-Shaped Phenomenon, All Being Current).
