|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 15, 2022 22:14:25 GMT
If evil is necessary for good to evolve to higher state then this necessitates evil as not only a good, because of its necessity, but good as fundamentally evil considering good always has deficiencies because it always evolves.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 20:35:24 GMT
The whole is the connection of parts, all things are one in the respect that all things share the quality of individuality/distinctness. The sum of the parts is the whole, the whole is reducible into the quality that is known as 'distinctness'. This leads to a paradox considering that all things are distinct, and this distinctness is the connecting quality of all things, yet this quality of distinctness (which all things share) necessitates a separation because of this very same quality of distinctness. Reality is both one and many and neither one nor many. What I Said Is Right, What You Said Is Still Wrong. Your Circulatory Logic Isn't Logical, It's Delusional. Everything I Just Said Is Perfectly Stated With No Room For Circulatory Responses, I Made Sure To Close Every Circulatory Point, And You Still Respond In Circulatory. This Tells Me One Thing, You Aren't Here To Learn, You're Here To Pretend To Philosophize, With No Victorious Means.Continual linear thinking is the repetition of linearism, this is circular as continual distinctions result in the phenomenon of "distinction" as repeating.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 13, 2022 20:40:38 GMT
What I Said Is Right, What You Said Is Still Wrong. Your Circulatory Logic Isn't Logical, It's Delusional. Everything I Just Said Is Perfectly Stated With No Room For Circulatory Responses, I Made Sure To Close Every Circulatory Point, And You Still Respond In Circulatory. This Tells Me One Thing, You Aren't Here To Learn, You're Here To Pretend To Philosophize, With No Victorious Means. Continual linear thinking is the repetition of linearism, this is circular as continual distinctions result in the phenomenon of "distinction" as repeating. All Philosophical Options Have Been Exhausted, And Yet You Still Repeat The Same Logical Fallacies Under Slightly Altered Responses, It's Not Getting Anywhere, Your Thoughts Are Not Formulating A Single New Idea, Your Responses Are Vague And Circulatory, I Have Already Shut Down Your Circulatory Generators, You Have No More Points To Argue, And You Contradicted Yourself Too Many Times.
You Are The Linear Thinker, You're Not Coming Up With Prodigal Ideas, Your Responses And Your Threads Have Provided Nothing New, It's All Repetitive Pretend-Philosophy That Has No Assembled Consensus That Is Thought Provoking In The Least.
I Told You, We Can Discuss Big Philosophical Ideas, Once You're Done With The Circulatory Training Wheels.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 20:51:03 GMT
Continual linear thinking is the repetition of linearism, this is circular as continual distinctions result in the phenomenon of "distinction" as repeating. All Philosophical Options Have Been Exhausted, And Yet You Still Repeat The Same Logical Fallacies Under Slightly Altered Responses, It's Not Getting Anywhere, Your Thoughts Are Not Formulating A Single New Idea, Your Responses Are Vague And Circulatory, I Have Already Shut Down Your Circulatory Generators, You Have No More Points To Argue, And You Contradicted Yourself Too Many Times.
You Are The Linear Thinker, You're Not Coming Up With Prodigal Ideas, Your Responses And Your Threads Have Provided Nothing New, It's All Repetitive Pretend-Philosophy That Has No Assembled Consensus That Is Thought Provoking In The Least.
I Told You, We Can Discuss Big Philosophical Ideas, Once You're Done With The Circulatory Training Wheels.No, I am pointing to the fact that you are circular and contradict yourself.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 13, 2022 21:05:54 GMT
All Philosophical Options Have Been Exhausted, And Yet You Still Repeat The Same Logical Fallacies Under Slightly Altered Responses, It's Not Getting Anywhere, Your Thoughts Are Not Formulating A Single New Idea, Your Responses Are Vague And Circulatory, I Have Already Shut Down Your Circulatory Generators, You Have No More Points To Argue, And You Contradicted Yourself Too Many Times.
You Are The Linear Thinker, You're Not Coming Up With Prodigal Ideas, Your Responses And Your Threads Have Provided Nothing New, It's All Repetitive Pretend-Philosophy That Has No Assembled Consensus That Is Thought Provoking In The Least.
I Told You, We Can Discuss Big Philosophical Ideas, Once You're Done With The Circulatory Training Wheels. No, I am pointing to the fact that you are circular and contradict yourself. No, You Are Revealing The Dunning-Kruger Effect Version Of Philosophy; You Are Terrible At Philosophy, But Don't Know You Are Terrible At Philosophy.
I'm Trying To Show You How To Escape That Philosophical Void Vacuum You Are In, But You Think I'm The One That Is In It, Just Like An Abusive Husband Thinks The Wife Is The Problem, Or A Narcissist Thinks The One Doing Everything For Them Is The Narccisist.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 21:42:04 GMT
No, I am pointing to the fact that you are circular and contradict yourself. No, You Are Revealing The Dunning-Kruger Effect Version Of Philosophy; You Are Terrible At Philosophy, But Don't Know You Are Terrible At Philosophy.
I'm Trying To Show You How To Escape That Philosophical Void Vacuum You Are In, But You Think I'm The One That Is In It, Just Like An Abusive Husband Thinks The Wife Is The Problem, Or A Narcissist Thinks The One Doing Everything For Them Is The Narccisist.Buddhism would not contradict what I say.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 13, 2022 22:22:51 GMT
No, You Are Revealing The Dunning-Kruger Effect Version Of Philosophy; You Are Terrible At Philosophy, But Don't Know You Are Terrible At Philosophy.
I'm Trying To Show You How To Escape That Philosophical Void Vacuum You Are In, But You Think I'm The One That Is In It, Just Like An Abusive Husband Thinks The Wife Is The Problem, Or A Narcissist Thinks The One Doing Everything For Them Is The Narccisist. Buddhism would not contradict what I say. Saying A Circle Is A Fallacy, Because It's A Fallacy, Has Nothing To Do With Buddhism Or Enlightenment xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 17, 2022 20:24:39 GMT
Buddhism would not contradict what I say. Saying A Circle Is A Fallacy, Because It's A Fallacy, Has Nothing To Do With Buddhism Or Enlightenment xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.Actually it does because it points to how we hold on to beliefs of reality and we are entrapped by its form(s). Reality is beyond form and the self-negating properties of language point to this. Our beliefs hold us back from no-thingness.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 17, 2022 22:11:03 GMT
Saying A Circle Is A Fallacy, Because It's A Fallacy, Has Nothing To Do With Buddhism Or Enlightenment xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Actually it does because it points to how we hold on to beliefs of reality and we are entrapped by its form(s). Reality is beyond form and the self-negating properties of language point to this. Our beliefs hold us back from no-thingness. No, The True Entrapment Is When People Like You Refuse To See Contradiction In Their Ways, Just As Buddhists Pray In Public, After The Ancient Ones Including The Bible Itself Proclaimed That Prayer In Public Disregards The Respect For The Creator, It Should Be In Secret.
I'm Sure That Old Guy From The Avatar Movie Thought Hedonistic Survival Was More Important Than Humanity, But That Doesn't Make Them Right, Especially When The Consequences Of Being For Yourself And Not Others Far Outweighs The Effort To Work As A Team.
You And Billions Of Others Have Become Fanatics At Ignoring Contradictions / Consequences, Then Continue To Beat A Dead Horse, And Beg People To Beat It With You.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 24, 2022 19:49:03 GMT
Actually it does because it points to how we hold on to beliefs of reality and we are entrapped by its form(s). Reality is beyond form and the self-negating properties of language point to this. Our beliefs hold us back from no-thingness. No, The True Entrapment Is When People Like You Refuse To See Contradiction In Their Ways, Just As Buddhists Pray In Public, After The Ancient Ones Including The Bible Itself Proclaimed That Prayer In Public Disregards The Respect For The Creator, It Should Be In Secret.
I'm Sure That Old Guy From The Avatar Movie Thought Hedonistic Survival Was More Important Than Humanity, But That Doesn't Make Them Right, Especially When The Consequences Of Being For Yourself And Not Others Far Outweighs The Effort To Work As A Team.
You And Billions Of Others Have Become Fanatics At Ignoring Contradictions / Consequences, Then Continue To Beat A Dead Horse, And Beg People To Beat It With You.You contradict yourself again, by claiming I do not see contradictions in my stance, considering my premises are that everything is a contradiction. I see contradiction as necessary, you do not yet you fall into contradiction.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 25, 2022 1:12:43 GMT
No, The True Entrapment Is When People Like You Refuse To See Contradiction In Their Ways, Just As Buddhists Pray In Public, After The Ancient Ones Including The Bible Itself Proclaimed That Prayer In Public Disregards The Respect For The Creator, It Should Be In Secret.
I'm Sure That Old Guy From The Avatar Movie Thought Hedonistic Survival Was More Important Than Humanity, But That Doesn't Make Them Right, Especially When The Consequences Of Being For Yourself And Not Others Far Outweighs The Effort To Work As A Team.
You And Billions Of Others Have Become Fanatics At Ignoring Contradictions / Consequences, Then Continue To Beat A Dead Horse, And Beg People To Beat It With You. You contradict yourself again, by claiming I do not see contradictions in my stance, considering my premises are that everything is a contradiction. I see contradiction as necessary, you do not yet you fall into contradiction. There Is No Contradictory Here, It's Your Circulatory Prison That Makes You Believe There Is Contradictory When There Is None.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 26, 2022 20:56:21 GMT
You contradict yourself again, by claiming I do not see contradictions in my stance, considering my premises are that everything is a contradiction. I see contradiction as necessary, you do not yet you fall into contradiction. There Is No Contradictory Here, It's Your Circulatory Prison That Makes You Believe There Is Contradictory When There Is None.And yet you point to the phenomenon of contradiction when you say there is no contradiction. To negate something it must first exist and if it existed at one time then it always exists as part of the fabric of reality.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 26, 2022 23:05:49 GMT
There Is No Contradictory Here, It's Your Circulatory Prison That Makes You Believe There Is Contradictory When There Is None. And yet you point to the phenomenon of contradiction when you say there is no contradiction. To negate something it must first exist and if it existed at one time then it always exists as part of the fabric of reality. No, You Are Contradicting Yourself, And Have Numerous Times Argued Against Your Own Argument, While I Have Carefully Surmised Truth.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 20:24:42 GMT
You contradict yourself again, by claiming I do not see contradictions in my stance, considering my premises are that everything is a contradiction. I see contradiction as necessary, you do not yet you fall into contradiction. There Is No Contradictory Here, It's Your Circulatory Prison That Makes You Believe There Is Contradictory When There Is None.You contradict yourself again, by claiming I do not see contradictions in my stance, considering my premises are that everything is a contradiction.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 20:41:33 GMT
There Is No Contradictory Here, It's Your Circulatory Prison That Makes You Believe There Is Contradictory When There Is None. You contradict yourself again, by claiming I do not see contradictions in my stance, considering my premises are that everything is a contradiction. You Are A Contradiction Because Of A Circulatory Consensus, Your Contradictory Does Not Dictate The Logic Of The Cosmos, I'm Sure The Perfect Machinery Of The Human Body Is Far More Poignant Than Your Pseudo-Philosophy That Hinges On The Word "Paradox".
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 20:49:05 GMT
You contradict yourself again, by claiming I do not see contradictions in my stance, considering my premises are that everything is a contradiction. You Are A Contradiction Because Of A Circulatory Consensus, Your Contradictory Does Not Dictate The Logic Of The Cosmos, I'm Sure The Perfect Machinery Of The Human Body Is Far More Poignant Than Your Pseudo-Philosophy That Hinges On The Word "Paradox".The fact that the universe occurs through cycles necessitates it's circulatory nature in the realm of the relative.
|
|