|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 15, 2022 22:14:25 GMT
If evil is necessary for good to evolve to higher state then this necessitates evil as not only a good, because of its necessity, but good as fundamentally evil considering good always has deficiencies because it always evolves.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Sept 16, 2022 6:29:28 GMT
I think that good can exist without any evil. In other case there would be no heaven.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 16, 2022 13:05:02 GMT
When broken down to its most basic form there's only growth and decay and then we come along and tag the perspective called Good and evil onto those
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 16, 2022 17:31:29 GMT
Good = Beneficial / Moral.
Bad = Consequential / Immoral.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 29, 2022 21:26:26 GMT
I think that good can exist without any evil. In other case there would be no heaven. Heaven cannot exist without Hell, otherwise there would be no distinction possible for heaven being heaven.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 29, 2022 21:29:46 GMT
Good = Beneficial / Moral.
Bad = Consequential / Immoral. That which is beneficial is consequential, you are creating a false dichotomy and relying on a dualism. If I work and receive a paycheck the consequences of my work is a paycheck. These consequences are beneficial as they justify my actions of working. All effects, either good or bad, justify the action as existing and as existing is good.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 29, 2022 21:32:07 GMT
When broken down to its most basic form there's only growth and decay and then we come along and tag the perspective called Good and evil onto those That is paradoxical as well given all growth requires moving beyond boundaries. This movement beyond boundaries results in the destruction of those previous boundaries; growth is decay. Dually all decay results in the change of a previous form into that of another thus growth; decay is growth.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 29, 2022 22:29:52 GMT
When broken down to its most basic form there's only growth and decay and then we come along and tag the perspective called Good and evil onto those That is paradoxical as well given all growth requires moving beyond boundaries. This movement beyond boundaries results in the destruction of those previous boundaries; growth is decay. Dually all decay results in the change of a previous form into that of another thus growth; decay is growth. Growth beyond boundaries does not require destroying the old boundaries something can simply grow and create new boundaries while leaving the old things the way they were. And I don't see why it's paradoxical when the two basic things reality can be rendered to is growth and decay how is that paradoxical?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 29, 2022 22:33:31 GMT
That is paradoxical as well given all growth requires moving beyond boundaries. This movement beyond boundaries results in the destruction of those previous boundaries; growth is decay. Dually all decay results in the change of a previous form into that of another thus growth; decay is growth. Growth beyond boundaries does not require destroying the old boundaries something can simply grow and create new boundaries while leaving the old things the way they were. And I don't see why it's paradoxical when the two basic things reality can be rendered to is growth and decay how is that paradoxical? A sappling growing into a tree negates the sappling. Growth and decay are relative opposites in one respect. However these opposites exist through eachother thus them being opposites is negated in another respect. One context says one thing, another context says another.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 29, 2022 22:36:36 GMT
Good = Beneficial / Moral.
Bad = Consequential / Immoral. That which is beneficial is consequential, you are creating a false dichotomy and relying on a dualism. If I work and receive a paycheck the consequences of my work is a paycheck. These consequences are beneficial as they justify my actions of working. All effects, either good or bad, justify the action as existing and as existing is good. There Is No False Dichotomy, My Work Is The Elimination Of Circulatory Thinking, So Your Assumption Is The Opposite Of Reality.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 29, 2022 22:39:21 GMT
That which is beneficial is consequential, you are creating a false dichotomy and relying on a dualism. If I work and receive a paycheck the consequences of my work is a paycheck. These consequences are beneficial as they justify my actions of working. All effects, either good or bad, justify the action as existing and as existing is good. There Is No False Dichotomy, My Work Is The Elimination Of Circulatory Thinking, So Your Assumption Is The Opposite Of Reality.Yet paradoxically it, ie your "work", depends on cycles.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 29, 2022 22:49:23 GMT
There Is No False Dichotomy, My Work Is The Elimination Of Circulatory Thinking, So Your Assumption Is The Opposite Of Reality. Yet paradoxically it, ie your "work", depends on cycles. Not Cycles, They Are Algorithms, A Level Deeper Than Cycles. Many Understand Cycles, Not Many Understand Algorithms, Especially The Ones I Tackle On A Daily Basis.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 29, 2022 22:52:59 GMT
Yet paradoxically it, ie your "work", depends on cycles. Not Cycles, They Are Algorithms, A Level Deeper Than Cycles. Many Understand Cycles, Not Many Understand Algorithms, Especially The Ones I Tackle On A Daily Basis.Yet your algorithms are the repetition, thus cycle, of the number 1.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 29, 2022 23:07:50 GMT
Not Cycles, They Are Algorithms, A Level Deeper Than Cycles. Many Understand Cycles, Not Many Understand Algorithms, Especially The Ones I Tackle On A Daily Basis. Yet your algorithms are the repetition, thus cycle, of the number 1. No, My Algorithms Are As The Universe Intended It, Which Is Vast And Beyond Human Intelligence. My PI Formula Is Better Than Super Computers And Quantum Computers, My Formulas Function Beyond The Prepubescent Naivety Of Repetition, It's Repetition That Prevented People From Understanding How PI Works, I Did What Nobody Has Done And Truly Figured Out What PI Is By Breaking Human Repetition.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 30, 2022 7:05:58 GMT
Growth beyond boundaries does not require destroying the old boundaries something can simply grow and create new boundaries while leaving the old things the way they were. And I don't see why it's paradoxical when the two basic things reality can be rendered to is growth and decay how is that paradoxical? A sappling growing into a tree negates the sappling. Growth and decay are relative opposites in one respect. However these opposites exist through eachother thus them being opposites is negated in another respect. One context says one thing, another context says another. You said destruction and a sapling is not destroyed because the full grown version of that tree exists and neither does the fact that said sapling will grow into a full size tree , and I used to have my horticulturist license so I've planted a few trees in my day
|
|