|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 8, 2022 22:14:17 GMT
1. Unity is the connection of parts. 2. Parts necessitate a separation.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 26, 2022 20:54:48 GMT
The circle is inevitable given all things which repeat are loops. The fact that we have symmetry in the universe points to the necessity of loops given anything which repeats, with this repetition being the prerequisite to symmetry, is a loop. Symmetry Is Indeed A Major Reference Point To The Limitations Of Design's System, The Same Symmetry I Used To Find My Mathematic Consensus Work. However, Your Use Of "Loops" And "Paradoxes" Aren't Real Loops And Paradoxes, It's You Making Things Up.Because all things relative exist through contrast paradoxes and contradictions are unavoidable within the realm of relativity.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 26, 2022 23:04:15 GMT
Symmetry Is Indeed A Major Reference Point To The Limitations Of Design's System, The Same Symmetry I Used To Find My Mathematic Consensus Work. However, Your Use Of "Loops" And "Paradoxes" Aren't Real Loops And Paradoxes, It's You Making Things Up. Because all things relative exist through contrast paradoxes and contradictions are unavoidable within the realm of relativity. They Are Not A Contrast-Paradox, That's What You Don't Get; It's A Perfectly Intelligent Creation System That Functions Intelligently, The Intelligence Of Design And Its Systematic Patterns Is Precisely What Makes It Not A Contrast-Paradox.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 20:23:27 GMT
Because all things relative exist through contrast paradoxes and contradictions are unavoidable within the realm of relativity. They Are Not A Contrast-Paradox, That's What You Don't Get; It's A Perfectly Intelligent Creation System That Functions Intelligently, The Intelligence Of Design And Its Systematic Patterns Is Precisely What Makes It Not A Contrast-Paradox.A pattern only exists through contrast considering the pattern is relative to other patterns. A universal pattern is an oxymoron considering there is no contrast through which it occurs.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 20:39:20 GMT
They Are Not A Contrast-Paradox, That's What You Don't Get; It's A Perfectly Intelligent Creation System That Functions Intelligently, The Intelligence Of Design And Its Systematic Patterns Is Precisely What Makes It Not A Contrast-Paradox. A pattern only exists through contrast considering the pattern is relative to other patterns. A universal pattern is an oxymoron considering there is no contrast through which it occurs. That Does Not Make It A Paradox.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 20:41:22 GMT
A pattern only exists through contrast considering the pattern is relative to other patterns. A universal pattern is an oxymoron considering there is no contrast through which it occurs. That Does Not Make It A Paradox.A paradox is the unification of contrasting things. Considering a pattern needs a contrasting pattern relative to it, something from which it stands out, a universal pattern does not have this.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 20:54:02 GMT
That Does Not Make It A Paradox. A paradox is the unification of contrasting things. Considering a pattern needs a contrasting pattern relative to it, something from which it stands out, a universal pattern does not have this. Reality-Contradiction Is Not The Same As Opposite-Contradiction, That Definition Is Poorly Worded; If It Was True, Hot And Cold Would Be A Paradox, But They Are Never Suggested As One, But When Two Variables Contradict Reality And Logic, It's A Paradox. What You Claim Does NOT Defy Reality In Any Way, It's Just Opposites; Not A Paradox.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 20:57:55 GMT
A paradox is the unification of contrasting things. Considering a pattern needs a contrasting pattern relative to it, something from which it stands out, a universal pattern does not have this. Reality-Contradiction Is Not The Same As Opposite-Contradiction, That Definition Is Poorly Worded; If It Was True, Hot And Cold Would Be A Paradox, But They Are Never Suggested As One, But When Two Variables Contradict Reality And Logic, It's A Paradox. What You Claim Does NOT Defy Reality In Any Way, It's Just Opposites; Not A Paradox.A paradox is unification of opposites. The absence of unification of opposites is contrast thus contradiction.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 21:06:22 GMT
Reality-Contradiction Is Not The Same As Opposite-Contradiction, That Definition Is Poorly Worded; If It Was True, Hot And Cold Would Be A Paradox, But They Are Never Suggested As One, But When Two Variables Contradict Reality And Logic, It's A Paradox. What You Claim Does NOT Defy Reality In Any Way, It's Just Opposites; Not A Paradox. A paradox is unification of opposites. The absence of unification of opposites is contrast thus contradiction. As I Said, The Wording Of That Definition Is Poor, So No It's Not A Paradox If It's Just Opposites Contradicting Each Other, It Has To Be Two Variables Contradicting The Balance Of Reality And Logic To Be A Paradox, Hence Fire / Water Are NOT A Paradox.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 21:09:22 GMT
A paradox is unification of opposites. The absence of unification of opposites is contrast thus contradiction. As I Said, The Wording Of That Definition Is Poor, So No It's Not A Paradox If It's Just Opposites Contradicting Each Other, It Has To Be Two Variables Contradicting The Balance Of Reality And Logic To Be A Paradox, Hence Fire / Water Are NOT A Paradox.No fire and water are contradictions given they are contrasting opposites, there unification (ie paradoxical nature) is steam.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 21:18:51 GMT
As I Said, The Wording Of That Definition Is Poor, So No It's Not A Paradox If It's Just Opposites Contradicting Each Other, It Has To Be Two Variables Contradicting The Balance Of Reality And Logic To Be A Paradox, Hence Fire / Water Are NOT A Paradox. No fire and water are contradictions given they are contrasting opposites, there unification (ie paradoxical nature) is steam. Fire / Water Are Not Paradoxes, Never In The Single Modicrum Of Human Existence Does Anyone Ever Say Fire / Water = Paradox.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 27, 2022 21:44:07 GMT
No fire and water are contradictions given they are contrasting opposites, there unification (ie paradoxical nature) is steam. Fire / Water Are Not Paradoxes, Never In The Single Modicrum Of Human Existence Does Anyone Ever Say Fire / Water = Paradox. No fire and water are contradictions given they are contrasting opposites, there unification (ie paradoxical nature) is steam.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 27, 2022 23:27:00 GMT
Fire / Water Are Not Paradoxes, Never In The Single Modicrum Of Human Existence Does Anyone Ever Say Fire / Water = Paradox. No fire and water are contradictions given they are contrasting opposites, there unification (ie paradoxical nature) is steam. You Lost This Debate. Fire / Water Are Opposites, But That Doesn't Make A Paradox; You Don't Know What "Paradox" Means, Because Clearly If You Did You Would Never Use That Definition Of "Paradox", Because It's Not What Makes A "Paradox".
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 3, 2022 21:50:59 GMT
No fire and water are contradictions given they are contrasting opposites, there unification (ie paradoxical nature) is steam. You Lost This Debate. Fire / Water Are Opposites, But That Doesn't Make A Paradox; You Don't Know What "Paradox" Means, Because Clearly If You Did You Would Never Use That Definition Of "Paradox", Because It's Not What Makes A "Paradox".Steam is the unifying of opposites, ie fire and water in this case.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Nov 4, 2022 1:07:13 GMT
You Lost This Debate. Fire / Water Are Opposites, But That Doesn't Make A Paradox; You Don't Know What "Paradox" Means, Because Clearly If You Did You Would Never Use That Definition Of "Paradox", Because It's Not What Makes A "Paradox". Steam is the unifying of opposites, ie fire and water in this case. That Is Not A "Paradox", Fire And Water Make Steam By Universal Law, There Is Nothing Contradicting About The Process.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 10, 2022 21:48:53 GMT
No fire and water are contradictions given they are contrasting opposites, there unification (ie paradoxical nature) is steam. Fire / Water Are Not Paradoxes, Never In The Single Modicrum Of Human Existence Does Anyone Ever Say Fire / Water = Paradox.Fire and water are opposites as they cancel each other out, the unity of said opposites is steam.
|
|