|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 8, 2022 22:14:17 GMT
1. Unity is the connection of parts.
2. Parts necessitate a separation.
|
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 4, 2022 21:26:37 GMT
It Exists Because Its The Counter-Reaction To Doing The Right Thing In Terms With Our Own Desires And How They Affect Others.
It Does NOT Exclude The Agency Of Self-Restraint, Or The Claim That Keeping People From Their Desires Is Totalitarianism, When In Reality, It Is People's Desires That Fed The Wolves Of Communism Creating Totalitarianism By Having Free Stuff, Having Plenty Of Feel-Good Propaganda Spewing Racial / Political Bias To Satiate Bloodlust And Vicarious Hunger For Drama And War Within People's Primitive Aspects. If guilt is a reaction then it is part of reality as an action. As an action it is real.
Its Existence Is Why Your Argument That Addressing People's Desires As Being Totalitarianism Is Not Correct.
People's Consequential Desires Are What Lead To Societal Immorality And Governmental Totalitarianism, Because People Chose Consequential Desire Over Paradise.
Fact: The Universe Will Often Challenge Our Desires, And Set Obstacles That Have Convenient Timing That Leans On Teaching A Relevant Lesson, I.E Someone With A Good Heart Chasing After A Sociopath, The Universe Will Keep Making It Fall Apart Until The Good Person Leaves The Sociopath, And Only Then Will Things Conveniently Get Better.
Like Morpheus Told Neo, "Don't Go After The Woman In The Red Dress, She Is A Distraction". |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 6, 2022 20:22:01 GMT
If guilt is a reaction then it is part of reality as an action. As an action it is real.
Its Existence Is Why Your Argument That Addressing People's Desires As Being Totalitarianism Is Not Correct.
People's Consequential Desires Are What Lead To Societal Immorality And Governmental Totalitarianism, Because People Chose Consequential Desire Over Paradise.
Fact: The Universe Will Often Challenge Our Desires, And Set Obstacles That Have Convenient Timing That Leans On Teaching A Relevant Lesson, I.E Someone With A Good Heart Chasing After A Sociopath, The Universe Will Keep Making It Fall Apart Until The Good Person Leaves The Sociopath, And Only Then Will Things Conveniently Get Better.
Like Morpheus Told Neo, "Don't Go After The Woman In The Red Dress, She Is A Distraction".Yet the distractions are part of the design. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 7, 2022 5:51:09 GMT
It Exists Because People Are Predisposed Towards Doing Good, But Temptation Erodes That Like Rusting A Bike.
Its Existence Is Why Your Argument That Addressing People's Desires As Being Totalitarianism Is Not Correct.
People's Consequential Desires Are What Lead To Societal Immorality And Governmental Totalitarianism, Because People Chose Consequential Desire Over Paradise.
Fact: The Universe Will Often Challenge Our Desires, And Set Obstacles That Have Convenient Timing That Leans On Teaching A Relevant Lesson, I.E Someone With A Good Heart Chasing After A Sociopath, The Universe Will Keep Making It Fall Apart Until The Good Person Leaves The Sociopath, And Only Then Will Things Conveniently Get Better.
Like Morpheus Told Neo, "Don't Go After The Woman In The Red Dress, She Is A Distraction". Yet the distractions are part of the design.
Not Everything Designed Is Meant For Us To Interact With, Some Parts Of Design Are Danger Zone For Us And We Are Warned Not To Partake In That Part's Temptation. Being A Part OF Design, Does NOT Make It A Necessity; The Very Opposite. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 19:58:25 GMT
Yet the distractions are part of the design.
Not Everything Designed Is Meant For Us To Interact With, Some Parts Of Design Are Danger Zone For Us And We Are Warned Not To Partake In That Part's Temptation. Being A Part OF Design, Does NOT Make It A Necessity; The Very Opposite.Being part of the design results in the necessity of illusion given the grand design cannot exist without illusion as illusion is part of the design....as a part of design it is necessary for the grand design otherwise it would not be the grand design. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 13, 2022 20:21:42 GMT
Not Everything Designed Is Meant For Us To Interact With, Some Parts Of Design Are Danger Zone For Us And We Are Warned Not To Partake In That Part's Temptation. Being A Part OF Design, Does NOT Make It A Necessity; The Very Opposite.Being part of the design results in the necessity of illusion given the grand design cannot exist without illusion as illusion is part of the design....as a part of design it is necessary for the grand design otherwise it would not be the grand design. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 20:40:28 GMT
Being part of the design results in the necessity of illusion given the grand design cannot exist without illusion as illusion is part of the design....as a part of design it is necessary for the grand design otherwise it would not be the grand design. The circulatory fallacy self-negates considering a circle is a fallacy because a circle is a fallacy, this fallacy is circular. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 13, 2022 20:50:08 GMT
More Circulatory Verbiage From You, I Can Teach You How To Escape Your Circulatory Perspective, If You Would Stop Arguing Circulatory Fallacies With More Circulatory Fallacies; Once Again, I Covered Every Basis In This Discussion, You Just Resort To Circulatory Fallacies Because You Are Preventing Yourself From Truly Understanding What You Are Thinking. The circulatory fallacy self-negates considering a circle is a fallacy because a circle is a fallacy, this fallacy is circular. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 20:52:36 GMT
The circulatory fallacy self-negates considering a circle is a fallacy because a circle is a fallacy, this fallacy is circular. Then let me restate myself: "Circular thinking is a fallacy because circular thinking is a fallacy" this is circular thinking. You contradict yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 13, 2022 21:01:41 GMT
This Is Not Philosophy, This Is Insanity. A Circle Is Not A Fallacy, Your Entire Myriad Of Circulatory Black-Hole Fallacy Brigade Of Paradox-Disillusioning Pretend-Philosophizing Self-Aggrandized Pseudo-Reality-Bending Intellectual Spite-Trite Inflated Conundrum Ground-Zero Sink Hole Reverse-Polarity Ontological Hedonistic Nihilistic Philosophical Spoofing With No Heightened Horizons Since Your First "Philosophical" Post On Here Is The Definition Of F.A.L.L.A.C.Y -- You Do Not Rise, But F.A.L.L As Long As You Pretend You Are Saying Anything "Intelligible" Like I Put In Pink Text And Maximum Text Size. Then let me restate myself: "Circular thinking is a fallacy because circular thinking is a fallacy" this is circular thinking. You contradict yourself.
You Aren't Restating Yourself, Until You Learn How Ridiculous Your Responses Truly Are, It's Embarrassing. You Have Avenues To Come Up With Solid Ideas That Truly Break Old Molds Of Thinking, And All You Can Do Is Come Up With Pseudo-Paradoxes. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 13, 2022 21:41:17 GMT
Then let me restate myself: "Circular thinking is a fallacy because circular thinking is a fallacy" this is circular thinking. You contradict yourself.
You Aren't Restating Yourself, Until You Learn How Ridiculous Your Responses Truly Are, It's Embarrassing. You Have Avenues To Come Up With Solid Ideas That Truly Break Old Molds Of Thinking, And All You Can Do Is Come Up With Pseudo-Paradoxes.ad-hominums from the inability to argue. Stating circular thinking is a fallacy is fallacious by its own laws. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 13, 2022 22:19:48 GMT
Look, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Your Responses Have No Ground-Breakers, Your Words Are Circulatory, Creating Infinite Loops Of Meaningless Nonsense, Not Consensuses That Improve Our Consciousness, It's Literally Pretend-Philosophy -- 100%.
You Aren't Restating Yourself, Until You Learn How Ridiculous Your Responses Truly Are, It's Embarrassing. You Have Avenues To Come Up With Solid Ideas That Truly Break Old Molds Of Thinking, And All You Can Do Is Come Up With Pseudo-Paradoxes. ad-hominums from the inability to argue. Stating circular thinking is a fallacy is fallacious by its own laws.
Circulatory Thinking Is Why Your Responses Are Embarrassing And Ridiculous, Have You Tried Not Using Circulatory Responses Yet? No. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 17, 2022 20:22:37 GMT
ad-hominums from the inability to argue. Stating circular thinking is a fallacy is fallacious by its own laws.
Circulatory Thinking Is Why Your Responses Are Embarrassing And Ridiculous, Have You Tried Not Using Circulatory Responses Yet? No.Avoiding the argument by not responding to it. Saying something is "embarrassing" or "ridiculous" is to avoid an actual response to it by pointing out 'why it is wrong'. As to the circulatory thinking; stating something is wrong because it is circular thinking is in itself circular thinking given circular thinking is wrong because circular thinking is wrong. You have no argument as to why the fallacies are the way they are as well as avoiding the fact that the fallacies self-negate when applied to themselves. There are no fallacies from my perspective but in your perspective there are and yet you fall under your own fallacies....your arguments contradict themselves. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 17, 2022 22:04:58 GMT
No Ad-Hominems Here, Saying Your Responses Are Embarrassing Or Ridiculous Is Not An Ad-Hominem, It's Not A Direct Attack, Even Professional Professors Would Say Someone's Response Is Ridiculous, There's Nothing Ad-Hominem About It.
Circulatory Thinking Is Why Your Responses Are Embarrassing And Ridiculous, Have You Tried Not Using Circulatory Responses Yet? No. Avoiding the argument by not responding to it. Saying something is "embarrassing" or "ridiculous" is to avoid an actual response to it by pointing out 'why it is wrong'. As to the circulatory thinking; stating something is wrong because it is circular thinking is in itself circular thinking given circular thinking is wrong because circular thinking is wrong. You have no argument as to why the fallacies are the way they are as well as avoiding the fact that the fallacies self-negate when applied to themselves. There are no fallacies from my perspective but in your perspective there are and yet you fall under your own fallacies....your arguments contradict themselves.
No, You Making Stuff Up That Makes No Logical Sense To Anyone That Actually Puts Effort Into Closing Circulatory Habits. I Haven't Seen You Say Anything That Is Ground-Breaking, Let Alone Pave Way To A Logical Conclusion, It's Fake Philosophy Circulatory Trite.
You Are Not Here To Learn Anything, You're Using Threads As A Soap Box To Entertain Your Small Circulatory Circus. I Told You, I Can Help You Escape Circulatory Thinking, If You Are Willing To See You Are A Prisoner To Circulatory Thinking. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 24, 2022 19:43:55 GMT
Avoiding the argument by not responding to it. Saying something is "embarrassing" or "ridiculous" is to avoid an actual response to it by pointing out 'why it is wrong'. As to the circulatory thinking; stating something is wrong because it is circular thinking is in itself circular thinking given circular thinking is wrong because circular thinking is wrong. You have no argument as to why the fallacies are the way they are as well as avoiding the fact that the fallacies self-negate when applied to themselves. There are no fallacies from my perspective but in your perspective there are and yet you fall under your own fallacies....your arguments contradict themselves.
No, You Making Stuff Up That Makes No Logical Sense To Anyone That Actually Puts Effort Into Closing Circulatory Habits. I Haven't Seen You Say Anything That Is Ground-Breaking, Let Alone Pave Way To A Logical Conclusion, It's Fake Philosophy Circulatory Trite.
You Are Not Here To Learn Anything, You're Using Threads As A Soap Box To Entertain Your Small Circulatory Circus. I Told You, I Can Help You Escape Circulatory Thinking, If You Are Willing To See You Are A Prisoner To Circulatory Thinking.The circle is inevitable given all things which repeat are loops. The fact that we have symmetry in the universe points to the necessity of loops given anything which repeats, with this repetition being the prerequisite to symmetry, is a loop. |
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Oct 25, 2022 1:10:52 GMT
Your Attempt To Undermine The Definition Of "Ridiculous" / "Embarrassing" Does Not Change How It Fits With Your Responses Being Ridiculous / Embarrassing Per Definition. Again, Professional Professors Will Call Something "Ridiculous" / "Preposterous" In Public Eye.
No, You Making Stuff Up That Makes No Logical Sense To Anyone That Actually Puts Effort Into Closing Circulatory Habits. I Haven't Seen You Say Anything That Is Ground-Breaking, Let Alone Pave Way To A Logical Conclusion, It's Fake Philosophy Circulatory Trite.
You Are Not Here To Learn Anything, You're Using Threads As A Soap Box To Entertain Your Small Circulatory Circus. I Told You, I Can Help You Escape Circulatory Thinking, If You Are Willing To See You Are A Prisoner To Circulatory Thinking. The circle is inevitable given all things which repeat are loops. The fact that we have symmetry in the universe points to the necessity of loops given anything which repeats, with this repetition being the prerequisite to symmetry, is a loop. |
|
