Post by Eugene 2.0 on Sept 3, 2022 20:02:44 GMT
According to realism, if you accept a view that there's something outside you, and it exists whatever you thing about it, or whichever how you look at it, then you're a realist.
Anti-realists accept another thought. By them we cannot see things clearly, without any interruptions from our own views. In other words, the objects of our view are constructed by our minds, but not completely. Logic outside of our views correspond to a logic outside, because we're projecting that structure onto the world.
Easiest way to explain these both thoughts using a concept of the universe without an observer. For antirealists such a universe is completely different to the universe with observers. By them, the cogito or the cognition leads an important role in the universe. It's not just a junk. Contrary to it, a realist would claim that it doesn't really matter whether or not there's a cognition, because nothing important had happened to the universe if the mind would have been removed or absent in it.
Anti-realists accept another thought. By them we cannot see things clearly, without any interruptions from our own views. In other words, the objects of our view are constructed by our minds, but not completely. Logic outside of our views correspond to a logic outside, because we're projecting that structure onto the world.
Easiest way to explain these both thoughts using a concept of the universe without an observer. For antirealists such a universe is completely different to the universe with observers. By them, the cogito or the cognition leads an important role in the universe. It's not just a junk. Contrary to it, a realist would claim that it doesn't really matter whether or not there's a cognition, because nothing important had happened to the universe if the mind would have been removed or absent in it.
