Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 28, 2022 20:39:28 GMT
We may analyze endlessly: an atom, an electron, a quark, a proto-quark... This is boring. What is the point in physics if not to look into microscopes with more and more powerful optical zoom?!..
I doubt any reason might be found among the particles. A particle doesn't play any role in investigating for knowledge. To know x means not to know a1, a2, ..., an such that a1, a2, ..., an are particles of x. To know x is to know everything. For instance: I want to know whether or not Sun is made of cheese. How can I finally solve this question? What should I do? Let's say I've got everything to do it: I can fly to Sun, I can taste a piece of Sun, but it never tells me the answer. It might be that tonight Sun is not cheese, but the day after tomorrow will be Swiss cheese. And if I don't know the other reasons, I will never ever know about this fact and will never confirm it. So, except of x I got to know x1, x2, ..., xj, ..., xn where x = xj.
Is philosophy possible without any analysis? Seems the analysis never get us closer to any answer.
I doubt any reason might be found among the particles. A particle doesn't play any role in investigating for knowledge. To know x means not to know a1, a2, ..., an such that a1, a2, ..., an are particles of x. To know x is to know everything. For instance: I want to know whether or not Sun is made of cheese. How can I finally solve this question? What should I do? Let's say I've got everything to do it: I can fly to Sun, I can taste a piece of Sun, but it never tells me the answer. It might be that tonight Sun is not cheese, but the day after tomorrow will be Swiss cheese. And if I don't know the other reasons, I will never ever know about this fact and will never confirm it. So, except of x I got to know x1, x2, ..., xj, ..., xn where x = xj.
Is philosophy possible without any analysis? Seems the analysis never get us closer to any answer.