1=0 II

Because of the totality both 1 and 0 equivocate:

The totality is 1 as there is only 1 "everything".
This totality is without comparison, however, thus equates to 0 as without comparison any phenomenon is indefinite.

1 and 0 is not binary.

The totality is unchanging because there is no contrast as only it exists.  The totality is everything, past/present/future, and as such is indefinite because a the aforementioned absence of contrast. 

In other terms, the totality has no contrast because the contrast would require something to exist outside the "everything" therefore the "everything" is not the everything.  In saying "totality", or the synonym of "everything", we are stating an absence of contrast.

"and" necessitates an absence of separation thus unity.

If the totality has parts these parts are extensions of the totality and as such are absolute as the totality is absolute.  In other words the parts must always be the parts of the totality for the totality to exist as the totality is the parts.  The self-referential nature of the totality necessitates it as unchanging; this self-referentiality necessitates an absence of comparison and we know the totality is self-referential because only the totality exists (ie only "being" exists).

Any definition through contrast would need a contrast of that contrast to occur for definition to result.  The contrast of "nothing" and "everything" is in itself obscure given it is a defining line that runs through both.  To elaborate my point:

1.  You have light.
2.  You have darkness.
3.  You have the line between the two.
4.  This line between the two separates them in one respect however in another respect the line is the origin of both light and dark as light/dark emerge from that same line;  the line both connects and separates and is contradictory in nature...in other words it is senseless.