|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 11, 2022 23:07:38 GMT
Truths and falsity are one; it is true that there are certain falsities which exist, it is false that there are certain truths that exist.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 15, 2022 17:01:59 GMT
I don't think anything falsely exists. We cannot imagine anything that doesn't exist. If we imagine something, e.g. a medusa-hydra, then it exists in our heads, or as an image within our head. (Indeed, if we decided this hydra-medusa to be alive it will be alive in our head, and so on.) But if it is impossible to imagine it doesn't exist. But such a restriction is very low. There are few objections to it: - a) are people only the creatures who dictate which to exist and which not to exist?
- b) if one person cannot imagine it, it doesn't mean there cannot be a person who doesn't
- c) if one person views an image in his head it doesn't mean he can see his own thought; he sees only a part of his thought
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 18, 2022 21:35:18 GMT
I don't think anything falsely exists. We cannot imagine anything that doesn't exist. If we imagine something, e.g. a medusa-hydra, then it exists in our heads, or as an image within our head. (Indeed, if we decided this hydra-medusa to be alive it will be alive in our head, and so on.) But if it is impossible to imagine it doesn't exist. But such a restriction is very low. There are few objections to it: - a) are people only the creatures who dictate which to exist and which not to exist?
- b) if one person cannot imagine it, it doesn't mean there cannot be a person who doesn't
- c) if one person views an image in his head it doesn't mean he can see his own thought; he sees only a part of his thought
It is true that the medusa exists in your head, it is false that it is empirical. One phenomenon exists as both true and false when the contexts expand. A. Animals have memory and as having memory there actions are dictated by that which no longer exists. B. A person imagining A and another person imagining A both observe A through there respective angles therefore A is divided into B and C perspectives. C. A person seeing only a part of his thought and in knowing it is only part must know that something exists beyond that part and in these respects encompasses the un-thought portion. |
|
